Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy in Leadership: Appropriate or Misplaced? An Empirical Study on a Topic that is Asking for Attention

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leadership has become a more popular term than management, even though it is understood that both phenomena represent important organizational behaviors. This paper focuses on empathy in leadership, and presents the findings of a study conducted among business students over the course of 3 years. Finding that empathy consistently ranked lowest in the ratings, the researchers set out to discover the driving motives behind this invariable trend, and conducted a second study to obtain opinions about possible underlying factors. The paper presents the findings of both studies, as well as literature reviews on the differences between management and leadership, a historical overview of leadership, a reflection of 21st century leadership, the ongoing debate on the effects of corporate psychopaths on ethical performance, and scholars’ perception on empathy in corporate leadership. The findings indicate the need for a paradigm shift in corporations as well as business schools in regards to leaders’ required skills, and suggest a proactive approach from business faculty to change the current paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Allio, R. J. (2009). Leadership—the five big ideas. Strategy & Leadership, 37(2), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, H., & Furniss, P. (2009). A successful leader or a psychopathic individual? Management Services, 53(4), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Regan Books/Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blame it on the Brain (October, 2006). Young Minds, 16 (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience). Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.cypnow.co.uk/news/759494/.headlinks.

  • Board, B. J., & Fritzon, K. (2005). Disordered personalities at work. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. (2010). Corporate psychopaths and productivity. Management Services, 54(1), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C., Ladyshewsky, R., & Galvin, P. (2010). The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Sautter, J., Littvay, L., Sautter, A., & Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics and personality: Empathy and narcissism as moderators of ethical decision making in business students. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. B. (2010). Being there: Why leaders should not “fiddle” while Rome burns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(1), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2005). Working with monsters. How to identify and protect yourself from workplace psychopaths. Sydney: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devay, M. (2010). Empathy: A multidisciplinary approach. Dissertation, Georgetown University, District of Columbia, United States. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text (Publication No. AAT 1475426).

  • Donaldson, C. (2008, September 30). Defining tomorrow’s leader. HR Leader. Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.humanresourcesmagazine.com.au/articles/E8/0C05A6E8.asp?Type=60&Category=1166.

  • Eriksen, M. (2009). Authentic leadership: Practical reflexivity, self-awareness and self-authorship. Journal of Management Education, 33(6), 747–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. (1994). Predators: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Psychology Today, 27(1), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopen, D. (2010). The changing role and practices of successful leaders. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 33(1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izenberg, D. (January, 2007). Does therapy belong in class? Maclean’s, 119(52–53), 34–35.

  • Karnes, R. (2009). A change in business ethics: The impact on employer-employee relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketola, T. (2006). From CR-psychopaths to responsible corporations: Waking up the inner sleeping beauty of companies. Corporate Social - Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(2), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrimmon, M. (2010). Reinventing leadership and management. Ivey Business Journal Online, 74(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T. (2008, December). Management matters: Make love and work. Successful Meetings. Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.successfulmeetings.com/Event-Planning/Meeting-Planning/Articles/Management-Matters-Make-Love-and-Work/.

  • McLean, J. E. (2005). Management and leadership: Dispelling the myths, ‘Management Matters’. The British Journal of Administrative Management, 9(1), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill Chalmers, W. (2010). Training to survive the workplace of today. Industrial and Commercial Training, 42(5), 270–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostovicz, E. I., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2009). A dynamic theory of leadership development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(6), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nienaber, H. (2010). Conceptualisation of management and leadership. Management Decision, 48(5), 661–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Pech, R. J., & Slade, B. W. (2007). Organisational sociopaths: Rarely challenged, often promoted. Why? Society and Business Review, 2(3), 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, T. (2005, June 21). Of criminals and CEOs. Newsweek, 48.

  • Polychroniou, P. V. (2009). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership of supervisors: The impact on team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 15(7/8), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, L. (2010). A historical analysis of the relationship between charisma and the making of great leaders. Ph.D. dissertation, Walden University, Minnesota, United States. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text (Publication No. AAT 3397897).

  • Stout, M. (2005, January). The ice people. Psychology Today, 38(1), 72–76, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2010). An enlightenment fit for the 21st century. New Statesman, 139(5006), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, R. R., Sutton, C. D., & Field, H. S. (2006). Individual differences in servant leadership: The roles of values and personality. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 27(8), 700–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (July, 2009). Emotional evaluation. Training Magazine, 20–23.

  • Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Woodbury University, Burbank, CA, USA

    Svetlana Holt & Joan Marques

Authors
  1. Svetlana Holt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Marques.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holt, S., Marques, J. Empathy in Leadership: Appropriate or Misplaced? An Empirical Study on a Topic that is Asking for Attention. J Bus Ethics 105, 95–105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation