Abstract
We show that if \(\kappa \) is \(H(\mu )\)-hypermeasurable for some cardinal \(\mu \) with \(\kappa < \mathrm {cf}(\mu ) \le \mu \) and GCH holds, then we can extend the universe by a cofinality-preserving forcing to obtain a model \(V^*\) in which the \(H(\mu )\)-hypermeasurability of \(\kappa \) is indestructible by the Cohen forcing at \(\kappa \) of any length up to \(\mu \) (in particular \(\kappa \) is \(H(\mu )\)-hypermeasurable in \(V^*\)). The preservation of hypermeasurability (in contrast to preservation of mere measurability) is useful for subsequent arguments (such as the definition of Radin forcing). The construction of \(V^*\) is based on the ideas of Woodin (unpublished) and Cummings (Trans Am Math Soc 329(1):1–39, 1992) for preservation of measurability, but suitably generalised and simplified to achieve a more general result. Unlike the Laver preparation (Isr J Math 29(4):385–388, 1978) for a supercompact cardinal, our preparation non-trivially increases the value of \(2^{\kappa ^+}\), which is equal to \(\mu \) in \(V^*\) (but \(2^\kappa =\kappa ^+\) is still true in \(V^*\) if we start with GCH).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, U.: Aronszajn trees on \(\aleph_2\) and \(\aleph_3\). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 24(3), 213–230 (1983)
Apter, A.W.: Strong cardinals can be fully Laver indestructible. Math. Log. Q. 48, 499–507 (2002)
Cummings, J.: A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 329(1), 1–39 (1992)
Cummings, J.: Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings. In: Foreman, M., Kanamori, A. (eds.) Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)
Cummings, J., Foreman, M.: The tree property. Adv. Math. 133(1), 1–32 (1998)
Friedman, S.D., Honzik, R.: The tree property at the \(\aleph_{2n}\)’s and the failure of the SCH at \(\aleph_\omega \). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 166(4), 526–552 (2015)
Friedman, S.D., Honzik, R., Stejskalová, S.: The tree property at \(\aleph_{\omega +2}\) with a finite gap. Submitted (2017)
Friedman, S.D., Honzik, R., Zdomskyy, L.: Fusion and large cardinal preservation. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 164, 1247–1273 (2013)
Friedman, S.D., Thompson, K.: Perfect trees and elementary embeddings. J. Symb. Log. 73(3), 906–918 (2008)
Gitik, M.: The negation of singular cardinal hypothesis from \(o(\kappa ) = \kappa ^{++}\). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 43, 209–234 (1989)
Gitik, M., Merimovich, C.: Possible values for \(2^{\aleph_n}\) and \(2^{\aleph_\omega }\). Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 90(1–3), 193–241 (1997)
Gitik, M., Shelah, S.: On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal. Arch. Math. Log. 28, 35–42 (1989)
Golshani, M.: Tree property at all regular even cardinals. Preprint (2017)
Hamkins, J.D.: The lottery preparation. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 101, 103–146 (2000)
Honzik, R., Verner, J.: A lifting argument for the generalized Grigorieff forcing. Notre Dame J. Form. Log. 57(2), 221–231 (2016)
Johnstone, T.S.: Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible. J. Symb. Log. 73(4), 1215–1248 (2008)
Kanamori, A.: Perfect-set forcing for uncountable cardinals. Ann. Math. Log. 19, 97–114 (1980)
Laver, R.: Making the supercompactness of \(\kappa \) indestructible under \(\kappa \) directed closed forcing. Isr. J. Math. 29(4), 385–388 (1978)
Merimovich, C.: A power function with a fixed finite gap everywhere. J. Symb. Log. 72(2), 361–417 (2007)
Mitchell, W.J.: Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property. Ann. Math. Log. 5(1), 21–46 (1972)
Shalom, Y.B.: On the Woodin construction of failure of GCH at a measurable cardinal. Appeared on arXiv on 25.6.2017
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank to Sy Friedman and Š. Stejskalová for helpful discussions regarding this paper. In particular, the proof of Lemma 2.3(ii) was suggested by Sy Friedman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author was supported by FWF/GAČR Grant I 1921-N25.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honzik, R. A Laver-like indestructibility for hypermeasurable cardinals. Arch. Math. Logic 58, 275–287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-018-0637-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-018-0637-0