Abstract
For Sengzhao 僧肇 (374−414 CE), a leading Sanlun 三論 philosopher of Chinese Buddhism, things in the world are ontologically indeterminate in that they are devoid of any determinate form or nature. In his view, we should understand and use words provisionally, so that they are not taken to connote the determinacy of their referents. To echo the notion of ontic indeterminacy and indicate the provisionality of language, his main work, the Zhaolun 肇論, abounds in paradoxical expressions. In this essay, I offer a philosophical analysis and rational reconstruction of Sengzhao’s linguistic thought, with a view to exploring the rationale for and purpose of his use of paradoxical language.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashmore, Robert. 2004. “Word and Gesture: On Xuan-School Hermeneutics of the Analects.” Philosophy East and West 54.4: 458−488.
Baozang Lun 寶藏論 (The Treasure Store Treatise), attributed to Sengzhao. In T, vol. 45, no. 1857.
Cheng, Chung-Ying. 1973. “On Zen (Ch’an) Language and Zen Paradoxes.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1.1: 77−102.
Coutinho, Steve. 2004. Zhuangzi and Early Chinese Philosophy: Vagueness, Transformation and Paradox. Hampshire and Burlington: Ashgate.
Ho, Chien-hsing. 2008. “The Finger Pointing toward the Moon: A Philosophical Analysis of the Chinese Buddhist Thought of Reference.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35.1: 159−177.
Kantor, Hans-Rudolf. 2010. “‘Right Words Are Like the Reverse’—The Daoist Rhetoric and the Linguistic Strategy in Early Chinese Buddhism.” Asian Philosophy 20.3: 283−307.
Katsura, Shōryū. 2000. “Nāgārjuna and the Tetralemma (Catuṣkoṭi).” In Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao, edited by Jonathan A. Silk. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Liebenthal, Walter, trans. 1968. Chao Lun: The Treatises of Seng-chao. Second Revised Edition. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Liu, Ming-wood. 1994. Madhyamaka Thought in China. Leiden, New York, and Köln: E. J. Brill.
Mohe Bore Boluomi Jing 摩訶般若波羅蜜經 (The Mahāprajñāparamitā Sūtra), trans. by Kumārajīva. In T, vol. 8, no. 223.
Priest, Graham. 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, Richard H. 1958–59. “Mysticism and Logic in Seng-Chao’s Thought.” Philosophy East and West 8.3/4: 99−120.
Sharf, Robert H. 2002. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism: A Reading of the Treasure Store Treatise. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Stace, W. T. 1987. Mysticism and Philosophy. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
Takakusu, Junjirō, and Kaigyoku Watanabe, eds. 1924–35. Taishō Shinshū Daizōkyō (abbreviated as T). Tokyo: Taishō Issaikyō Kankōkai.
Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra. 2006. In Vimalakīrtinirdeśa: A Sanskrit Edition Based upon the Manuscript Newly Found at the Potala Palace, edited by Study Group on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature, the Institute for Comprehensive Studies of Buddhism, Taisho University. Tokyo: Taisho University Press.
Wang, Youru. 2003. Linguistic Strategies in Daoist Zhuangzi and Chan Buddhism: The Other Way of Speaking. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Weimojie Suoshuo Jing 維摩詰所說經 (The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra), trans. by Kumārajīva. In T, vol. 14, no. 475.
Westerhoff, Jan. 2009. Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wright, Dale S. 1982. “The Significance of Paradoxical Language in Hua-yen Buddhism.” Philosophy East and West 32.3: 325−338.
Zhaolun 肇論 (The Treatise of Sengzhao), by Sengzhao. In T, vol. 45, no. 1858.
Zhaolun Shu 肇論疏 (A Commentary on the Treatise of Sengzhao), by Yuankang 元康. In T, vol. 45, no. 1859.
Zhonglun 中論 (The Middle Treatise), trans. by Kumārajīva. In T, vol. 30, no. 1564.
Zhuangzi Yinde 莊子引得 (A Concordance to Chuang Tzu). 1956. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, Supplement no. 20. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zhu Weimojiejing 注維摩詰經 (A Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra), by Sengzhao. In T, vol. 38, no. 1775.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, Ch. Ontic Indeterminacy and Paradoxical Language: A Philosophical Analysis of Sengzhao’s Linguistic Thought. Dao 12, 505–522 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9347-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9347-9