No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Which Mystic has the Revelation?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
Since the late nineteenth century, studies of mysticism have presented us with two contrasting conclusions. The first is that mystics all over the world report basically the same experience, and the second is that there are great differences among the reports, and possibly among the experiences. On the positive side there are such works as Huxley's The Perennial Philosophy, with its claim that all mystics say that all beings are manifestations of a Divine Ground, that men learn of this by direct intuition, that men have two natures, one phenomenal and one eternal, and that identification with his eternal nature is the purpose of man. Walter Stace supports this view, in a modified way, with his observation that, while each mystic seems to advance a peculiar explanation of his experience, their statements collectively exhibit strong similarities. Mystics commonly report a consciousness of unity, carrying with it feelings of objectivity, blessedness, and holiness. They describe their experience in paradoxical language, and say that ultimately it is ineffable. These twentieth-century observations are repetitions of those of William James, so that this basic point has become a cliché, and, as R. C. Zaehner says, ‘We have been told ad nauseum that mysticism is the highest expression of religion and that it appears in all ages and in all places in a more or less identical form, often in a religious milieu that would seem to be the reverse of propitious.’
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975
References
page 283 note 1 Huxley, Aldous, The Perennial Philosophy (London, Chatto and Windus, 1957).Google Scholar This summary is from his introduction to The Song of God: Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Swami, Prabharananda and Isherwood, Christopher (New York: Mentor Books, 1959), 13.Google Scholar
page 283 note 2 Stace, W. T., Mysticism and Philosophy (Philadelphia and New York: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1960), 131–133.Google Scholar
page 283 note 3 Zaehner, R. C., Mysticism Sacred and Profane (A Galaxy Book; New York: Oxford University Press, 1961), ix.Google Scholar
gpage 283 note 4 James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1919), 381.Google Scholar
page 284 note 1 James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1919), 381.Google Scholar
page 284 note 2 Underhill, Evelyn, Mysticism (Meridian Books; New York: 1960), 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 284 note 3 Stace, , op. cit., 80.Google Scholar
page 284 note 4 Zaehner, , op. cit., xiii.Google Scholar
page 284 note 5 James, , op. cit., 6–7.Google Scholar
page 284 note 6 The Bucke, R. M. Memorial Society for the Study of Religious Experience, Proceedings of the First Annual Conference (Montreal, Canada, 1965), 36.Google Scholar
page 285 note 11 Stace, , op. cit., 29.Google Scholar
page 285 note 2 Bergson, Henri, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (Doubleday Anchor Books; Garden City, N.Y. 1954), 227–8.Google Scholar
page 285 note 3 Bergson, , op. cit., 228.Google Scholar
page 286 note 1 Bergson, Henri, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (Doubleday Anchor Books; Garden City, N.Y. 1954), 227.Google Scholar
page 286 note 2 Ibid., 229–30.
page 286 note 3 Bertrand, Russell and Copleston, F. C., ‘A Debate on the Existence of God’, The Existence of God, ed. Hick, John (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1964), 181.Google Scholar
page 286 note 4 Zaehner, , op. cit., 200.Google Scholar
page 286 note 5 D'Arcy, Martin, The Meeting of Love and Knowledge (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1958), 88–9.Google Scholar
page 286 note 6 Masters, R. E. L. and Houston, Jean, The Varieties of Psychedelic Experience (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966), 307.Google Scholar
page 287 note 1 Masters, and Houston, , op. cit., 314.Google Scholar
page 287 note 2 Stace, , op. cit., 134.Google Scholar
page 287 note 3 Ibid., 135.
page 288 note 1 D'Arcy, , op. cit., 89.Google Scholar
page 288 note 2 Wesley, , Salmon, C., Logic (Foundations of Philosophy Series: Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: 1963), 64.Google Scholar
page 288 note 3 Ibid., 66.
page 288 note 1 Aquinas, Thomas, The Summa Theologica, I, Article 8, reply to 2nd objection, in Introduction to St. Thomas Aquinas, edited by Pegis, Anton C. (New York: Random House, 1948), 14–15.Google Scholar
page 288 note 2 Aristotle, , Rhetoric, 1378a, 5–15.Google Scholar
page 288 note 1 Aristotle, , Rhetoric, 1356a, 6–8.Google Scholar
page 288 note 2 Stace, , op. cit., 134–7.Google Scholar
page 288 note 3 Flew, Antony, ‘Theology and Falsification’, from New Essays in Philosophical Theology, edited by Antony, Flew and MacIntyre, Alasdair (London: SCM Press, 1961).Google Scholar