Skip to main content
Log in

Aspects concerning entropy and utility

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expected utility maximization problem is one of the most useful tools in mathematical finance, decision analysis and economics. Motivated by statistical model selection, via the principle of expected utility maximization, Friedman and Sandow (J Mach Learn Res 4:257–291, 2003a) considered the model performance question from the point of view of an investor who evaluates models based on the performance of the optimal strategies that the models suggest. They interpreted their performance measures in information theoretic terms and provided new generalizations of Shannon entropy and Kullback–Leibler relative entropy and called them U-entropy and U-relative entropy. In this article, a utility-based criterion for independence of two random variables is defined. Then, Markov’s inequality for probabilities is extended from the U-entropy viewpoint. Moreover, a lower bound for the U-relative entropy is obtained. Finally, a link between conditional U-entropy and conditional Renyi entropy is derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, A. (2003). Entropy methods in decision analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University.

  • Abdellaoui M. (2002) A genuine rank-dependent generalization of the von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility theorem. Econometrica 70: 717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aczel J., Daroczy Z. (1975) On measures of information and their characterization. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N., Csaki F. (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Budapest, Akademiai Kiado, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendinger J., Imkeller P., Schweizer M. (1998) Additional logarithmic utility of an insider. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 75: 263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimitsu T., Arimitsu N. (2000) Tsallis statistics and fully developed turbulence. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 33(27): L235–L241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimitsu T., Arimitsu N. (2001) Analysis of turbulence by statistics based on generalized entropies. Physica A 295: 177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K., Anderson D. (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference (2nd ed.). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachin, C. (1997). Entropy measures and unconditional security in cryptography. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.

  • Campbell L. L. (1965) A coding theorem and Renyis entropy. Information and Control 8: 423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N., Read T. (1984) Multinomial goodness of fit tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 46(3): 440–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G. (1960) Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: Arrow K.J., Karlin S., Suppes P. (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA, pp 16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir S. S. (2003) On the p-Logarithmic and α-Power divergence measures in information theory. Panamerican Mathematics Journal 13(3): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P. C. (1989) Non-transitive measurable utility for decision under uncertainty. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman C., Sandow S. (2003a) Learning probabilistic models: An expected utility maximization approach. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4: 257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman C., Sandow S. (2003b) Model performance measures for expected utility maximizing investors. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 6(4): 355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman C., Huang J., Sandow S. (2004) Model performance measures for leveraged investors. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 7(5): 541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frittelli M., Biagni S. (2005) Utility maximization in incomplete markets for unbounded processes. Finance and Stochastics 9: 493–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman C., Huang J., Sandow S. (2007) A utility-based approach to some information measures. Entropy 9: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundel A. (2005) Robust utility maximization for complete and incomplete market models. Finance and Stochastics 9: 151–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstein I. N., Milnor J. (1953) An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 21: 291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoseinzadeh A. R., Mohtashami Borzadaran G. R., Yari G. H. (2009) A view on extension of utility-based on links with information measures. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society 16(5): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll J. (1987) Theory of financial decision making. Rowman and Littlefield, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback S., Leibler R. A. (1951) On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22: 79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenda B. H. (1998) The analogy between coding theory and multifractals. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31: 5651–5660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liese F., Vajda I. (1987) Convex statistical distances. Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Morningstar. (2002). The new morningstar ratingTM methodology. http://www.morningstar.dk/downloads/MRARdefined.pdf.

  • Nakamura Y. (1995) Rank dependent utility for arbitrary consequence spaces. Mathematical Social Science 29: 103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikovsky I., Karatzas I. (1996) Anticipative portfolio optimization. Advances in Applied Probability 28: 1095–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C. E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja I. J., Kumar P. (2004) Relative information of type s, Csiszar’s f-divergence, and information inequalities. Information Sciences 166: 105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah A. (1996) Entropy, divergence and distance measures with econometric applications. Journal of the Statistical Planning and Inference 49: 137–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdu S. (1998) Fifty Years of Shannon Theory. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Special Commemorative Issue 44(6): 2057–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von-Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed., 1947; 3rd ed., 1953). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Mohtashami Borzadaran.

Additional information

G. R. Mohtashami Borzadaran is a member of Ordered and Spatial Data Center of Excellence of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoseinzadeh, A.R., Mohtashami Borzadaran, G.R. & Yari, G.H. Aspects concerning entropy and utility. Theory Decis 72, 273–285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9232-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9232-5

Keywords

Navigation