Abstract
I first provide an interpretation of the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo based on the Fourth Lateran Council, according to which God creates from nothing if and only if God creates everything except God Himself. I then show that this doctrine entails the modal problem that it is both possible and not possible that there is nothing at all except God, or alternatively, that it is both necessary and not necessary that there is something else besides God. I proceed to examine several proposals to solve the problem, and find them all inadequate. Therefore, I conclude that creatio ex nihilo violates modal logic and is necessarily false.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Aquinas (1947) I, q.44, a.2, co., my italics.
Ibid. I, q.45, a.1, co., my italics. .
For more detailed discussion concerning the strength of God, see Leftow (2009).
Aquinas (1947) I, q.19, a.6, co.
I’m grateful to an anonymous referee for reminding me of the importance of this issue.
I assume that conceivability is a guide to possibility.
Ibid. I, q.19, a.8, obj. 2. The Leonine editors of Corpus Thomisticus identify Avicenna as one of these authors. .
Ibid. I, q.19, a.8, co. My italics.
For a detailed discussion of Aquinas’s view on the real distinction between creaturely existence and essence, see Wippel (2000), pp 13–176.
See for example the collected essays in Widerker and McKenna (2003).
I thank Andrew Loke for this suggestion.
I thank Winfried Löffler for this proposal. Historically, the sceptical attitude via divine simplicity is often attributed to Thomas Aquinas.
See for example the essays in Dougherty and McBrayer (2014).
References
Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa theologica. (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). New York: Benzinger Bros.
Coggins, G. (2010). Could there have been nothing? Against metaphysical nihilism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Craig, W. L., & Quentin, S. (1993). Theism, atheism and big bang cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dougherty, T., & Macbrayer, J. B. (Eds.). (2014). Skeptical theism: new essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, G. (2012). A thomistic metaphysics of creation. Religious Studies, 48(3), 337–356.
Leftow, B. (2009). Omnipotence. In T. Flint & M. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology (pp. 167–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDaniel, K. (2009). Ways of being. In D. Manley, D. Chalmers, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: new essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 290–319). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morriston, W. (2002). Creatio ex nihilo and the big bang. Philo, 5(1), 23–33.
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2013). The subtraction arguments for metaphysical nihilism. In T. Goldschmidt (Ed.), The puzzle of existence: Why is there something rather than nothing? (pp. 197–214). London: Routledge.
Sider, T. (2009). Ontological realism. In D. Manley, D. Chalmers, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 384–423). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, J. (2010). Ontological pluralism. The Journal of Philosophy, 107(1), 5–34.
Widerker, D., & McKenna, M. (Eds.). (2003). Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities: essays on the importance of alternative possibilities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Wippel, J. (2000). The metaphysical thoughts of Thomas Aquinas: from finite being to uncreated being. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
Wolter, A. B. (1946). The transcendentals and their function in the metaphysics of John Duns Scotus. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, PS. The modal problem of creatio ex nihilo. Int J Philos Relig 88, 197–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09735-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09735-w