Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:41:09.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychometric Approach to Social Capital: Using AsiaBarometer Survey Data in 29 Asian Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

ZEN-U LUCIAN HOTTA
Affiliation:
Nankai University and Resonant Systems
TAKASHI INOGUCHI
Affiliation:
Nankai University and Resonant Systems

Abstract

This paper is one of the few attempts made by social scientists to measure social capital via psychometric approach, and is the only one of such kind to base its evidence on the AsiaBarometer survey data. After first reviewing the history of social capital, including its conceptual emergence and recent literatures, we expose the issue of difficulty in the measurement of social capital despite its topical popularity. We tackle this measurement issue by applying psychometric procedures to the AsiaBarometer survey data of 2004, 2005, and 2006, focusing on questions pertaining to social capital of ordinary individuals residing in the 29 survey societies. This paper is significant in two aspects. First, using simple statistical procedures, it extracts various dimensions of social capital without first knowing what dimensions to extract. In short, it does not try to measure social capital using some kind of pre-defined concepts such as those outlined in the historical review of our predecessors. Rather, it succeeds in manifesting key factors of social capital – altruism, utilitarianism, communitarianism, and concordance with prevailing regime – by mechanically processing collective responses by individual respondents towards survey questions oriented with social capital. Though the paper does not aim to establish its methodology as a widely held consensus on how to measure social capital, it does give credence and recognition to psychometric approaches as effectives means to measure social capital, which, by its very definition, calls for ‘objective’ approaches using collective data to measure ‘subjective’ notions of individual actions within networks. Second, this paper is the first systematic empirical analysis of social capital in all the subregions of Asia, i.e. East, Southeast, South, and Central. It builds on our earlier works, including the 2006 paper on social capital in Central and South Asia, and gives empirical credence to important concepts on Asian political culture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alessandrini, M. (2002), ‘Is Civil Society an Adequate Theory?’, Third Sector Review, 8 (2).Google Scholar
Bacon, Stephen et al. (ed.) (2003), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bankston, C. and Zhou, M. (2002) “Social Capital as Process: The Meanings and Problems of a Theoretical Metaphor,” ociological Inquiry, Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 285 - 317: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1996), Accounting for Tastes. Part I: Personal Capital; Part II: Social Capital. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boisot, M. (1995) Information space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Boland, R.J., Tensaki, R.V., (1995), ? Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing ?, Organization science, Vol. 6, pp. 350-372.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1983), ‘Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital’, in Soziale Ungleichheiten (Soziale Welt, Sonderheft 2), edited by Kreckel, Reinhard, Goettingen: Otto Schartz & Co. pp. 183–98. The article appears here in English translated by Nice, Richard.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1988), ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): S95–S120, abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, B. and Foley, M. W. (1998), ‘Civil Society and Social Capital Beyond Putnam’, American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1): 124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everingham, C. (2001), ‘Reconstituting community: social justice, social order and the politics of community’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 36 (2): 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Ben. (2001), Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foley, M. W. and Edwards, B. (1997), ‘Escape from Politics? Social Theory and the Social Capital Debate’, American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (5): 550–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creations of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973), ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Madison, and Jay, (2003) The Federalist Papers: Bantam Classics.Google Scholar
Hazelton, V. and Kennan, W. (2000) Social capital: Reconceptualizing the bottom line, Corporate Communications: An International Journal 5 (2), pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
Hunout, P. (2000) Droit du travail et culture sociale – L'example allemand: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2004), ‘Social Capital in Ten Asian Societies: Is Social Capital a Good Concept to Gauge Democratic, Developmental and Regionalizing Trends in Asia?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi, Basáñez, M., Tanaka, A., and Dadabaev, Timur (eds.) (2005), Human Values and Lifestyles in Urban Asia: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook Based on the AsiaBarometer 2003 Survey, Delegacion Coyoacan, Mexico: SigloXXI Editores.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi and Hotta, Lucian Z. (2003), ‘Five Groups of Countries’, IOC Discussion Paper No.1, Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, March.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi and Hotta, Zen-U Lucian (2006), ‘Quantifying Social Capital in Central and South Asia: Are There Democratic, Developmental, and Regionalizing Potentials?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, Ichiro and Kennedy, Bruce P. (2002), The Health of Nations: Why Inequality is Harmful to Your Health, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan (2002), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.” Academy of Management Review 23(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. (1998), ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1995), ‘Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy, 6 (1): 6578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (2002), Making Democracy Work: The Civic Tradition in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (ed.) (2002), Democracies in Flux, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toqueville, A. de (2007) Democracy in America: Echo Library.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1930), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Zhou, M. (1997) “Social Capital in Chinatown: the Role of Community-Based Organizations and Families in the Adaptation of the Younger Generation.” Pp. 181-206 in Weis, Lois and Seller, Maxine S. (eds.), Beyond Black and White: New Voices, New Faces in the United States Schools: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, M. and Bankston, C. (1998), Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar