Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Player and Referee Roles Held Jointly: The Effect of State Ownership on China’s Regulatory Enforcement Against Fraud

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the prevailing state ownership in the Chinese stock market on corporate governance and the financial regulatory system, respectively, as the internal and external monitoring mechanisms to deter corporate fraud and protect investors. In line with the literature that state ownership exaggerates the agency problem, we find that the retained state ownership in privatised firms increases the incidence of regulatory enforcements against fraud. For the state-owned enterprises (SOEs), however, larger state ownership is associated with a lower incidence of enforcement actions. This is attributed to the mutual political affiliation of the fraudulent SOEs and the regulatory commission. A new regulation “Solutions for Listed Firm Checks” promulgated in March 2001 has mitigated this effect by empowering the regulatory commission to increase the severity of regulatory conditions. Our evidence confirms the improvement in the regulatory environment and investor protection in the Chinese stock market brought about by the regulatory reform and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian: 2005, “Law, finance, and economic growth in China”, Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 57-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson. D. M.: 2000, “Taking stock in China: Company disclosure and information in China’s stock markets”, Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 1919-1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S.:1996, “An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Direector Composition and Financial Statement Fraud”, Accounting Review, 71, 443-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and P. D. Lapides: 2000, “Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms”, Accounting Horizons, 14: 441-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.: 2003, “Capital Markets and Legal Development: the China Case”, China Economic Review, 14, 451-472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., M. Firth, D. Gao, and O. M. Rui: 2005, “Is China’s Securities Regulatory Agency a Toothless Tiger? Evidence form Enforcement Actions” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 451-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., M. Firth, D. Gao, and O. Rui: 2006, “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., M. Firth, and L. Xu: 2009, “Does the Type of Ownership Control Matter? Evidence from China’s Listed Companies”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 171-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., M. Firth, X. Yu, and L. Xu: 2008, “Control Transfers, Privatization, and Corporate Performance: Efficiency Gains in China’s Listed Companies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 161-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y., P. Jiang, P. Limpaphayom, and T. Lou: 2010, “Corporate Governance in China: a Step Forward”, European Financial Management, 16, 94-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G.: 1997, “Challenges of China’s Economic System for Economic Theory”, American Economic Review, 87, 321-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D.: 2003, “Corporate Governance in China: An Overview”, China Economic Review, 14, 494-507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahya, J., Y., Karbhari, J. Z. Xiao, and M. Yang: 2003, “The Usefulness of the Supervisory Board Report in China”, Corporate Governance: An Internal Review, 11, 308-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney: 1996, “Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13:1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis. D., P. Hanouna, and A. Sarin: 2006, “Is There a Dark Side to Incentive Compensation?”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 467-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, S., C. Jia, Y. Li, and Z. Wu: 2011, ‘Reactivity and Passivity after Enforcement Actions: Better Late than Never’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.

  • Ding, Y., H. Zhang, and J. Zhang: 2007, “Private vs State Ownership and Earnings Management: evidence from Chinese listed companies”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., and M. Jensen: 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., T. Wong, T. Zhang: 2007: “Politically connected COEs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., P. Mo and R. Wong: 2005, ‘Financial Statement Frauds and Auditor Sanctions: An Analysis of Enforcement Actions in China’. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 0167–4544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., C. Lin and H. Zou: 2010, ‘Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45, 685–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., O. M. Rui and W. Wu: 2011, ‘Cooking the Books: Recipes and Costs of Falsified Financial Statements in China’, Journal of Corporate Finance 17(2), 371–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., P. Fung, and O. Rui: 2006, “Corporate performance and CEO compensation in China,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 693-714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., C. Lin, P. Liu, and S. Wong: 2009, “Inside the Black Box: Bank Credit Allocation in China’s Private Sector”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 1144-1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., I. Hasan, and X. Sun: 2009, “Political connections and the process of going public: Evidence from China” Journal of International Money and Finance, 28, 696-719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F., J. Kim, and A. Qiu: 2010, “Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China,” Journal of Financial Economics, 95, 425-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, W.: 2010, `The Bargaining of Dual-Class Conflicting Shareholders in the Split Share Structure Reform', Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1308210.

  • Hou, W., S. Howell: 2011, ‘Trading Constraints and Illiquidity Discounts’, European Journal of Finance, forthcoming.

  • Jensen, M: 2010, ‘Putting Integrity into Finance: A Positive Approach’, Harvard Business School Negotiation, Organizations and Markets Unit, Research Paper Series No. 06-06.

  • Jia, C., S. Ding, Y. Li, and Z. Wu: 2009, “Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China”, Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 561-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G., C. M. C. Lee, H. Yue: 2010, “Tunneling Through Intercoporate Loans: The China Experience”, Journal of Financial Economics, 98, 1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John. K., and L. W. Senbet: 1998, “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 371-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, I., and L. B. Kellogg: 1991, “Fraud, Window Dressing, and Negligence in Financial Statement”, Commercial Law Series, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A. I., and A. Mian: 2005: “Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1371-1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., L. Meng, J. Zhang: 2006, “Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China” Economic Inquiry, 44, 559-578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Z. Lu: 2007, “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management in the Chinese Listed Companies: A Tunneling Perspective” Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 881-906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.: 1997, “Business Ethics in China” Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1509-1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.: 2008, “A Chinese Perspective: Business Ethics in China Now and in the Future”, Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 451-461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, S. and J. Wyatt: 1990, “Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth”, Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R., Vishny: 1986, “Large shareholders and coporate control”, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, H., S. H. Szewczyk, and R. Varma: 2004, “Board Composition and Corporate Fraud”, Financial Analyst Journal, 60, 33-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenxuan Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, W., Moore, G. Player and Referee Roles Held Jointly: The Effect of State Ownership on China’s Regulatory Enforcement Against Fraud. J Bus Ethics 95 (Suppl 2), 317–335 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0858-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0858-1

Key words

Navigation