Skip to main content
Log in

What is Classical Mereology?

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical mereology is a formal theory of the part-whole relation, essentially involving a notion of mereological fusion, or sum. There are various different definitions of fusion in the literature, and various axiomatizations for classical mereology. Though the equivalence of the definitions of fusion is provable from axiom sets, the definitions are not logically equivalent, and, hence, are not inter-changeable when laying down the axioms. We examine the relations between the main definitions of fusion and correct some technical errors in prominent discussions of the axiomatization of mereology. We show the equivalence of four different ways to axiomatize classical mereology, using three different notions of fusion. We also clarify the connection between classical mereology and complete Boolean algebra by giving two “neutral” axiom sets which can be supplemented by one or the other of two simple axioms to yield the full theories; one of these uses a notion of “strong complement” that helps explicate the connections between the theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, J. L., & Slomson, A. B. (1969). Models and ultraproducts: An introduction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C. (1999). Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krifka, M. (1990). Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 487–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Landman, F. (1991). Structures for semantics. Number 45 in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Landman, F. (2000). Events and plurality: The jerusalem lectures. Number 76 in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leonard, H., & Goodman, N. (1940). The calculus of individuals and its uses. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, D. (1991). Parts of classes. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, et al. (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 303–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Link, G. (1998). Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pontow, C. (2004). A note on the axiomatics of theories in parthood. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 50, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pontow, C., & Schubert, R. (2006). A mathematical analysis of theories of parthood. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 59, 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharvy, R. (1980). A more general theory of definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 89(4), 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharvy, R. (1983). Mixtures. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44(2), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simons, P. (1987). Parts: A study in ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tarski, A. (1935). Zur grundlegung der booleschen algebra. I. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 24, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarski, A. (1983). Foundations of the geometry of solids. In J. Corcoran (Ed.), Logic, semantics, meta-mathematics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uzquiano, G. (2006). The price of universality. Philosophical Studies, 129, 137–169, May.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Varzi, A. (2004). Mereology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ( fall 2004 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/mereology/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hovda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hovda, P. What is Classical Mereology?. J Philos Logic 38, 55–82 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-008-9092-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-008-9092-4

Keywords

Navigation