Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Empathy Imitation Game: Empathy Turing Test for Care- and Chat-bots

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Medical Royal College. (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Retrieved from https://www.aomrc.org.uk/reports-guidance/artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare/. Accessed 8 Dec 2020

  • Chita-Tegmark, M., Ackerman, J. M., & Scheutz, M. (2019). Effects of assistive robot behavior on impressions of patient psychological attributes: Vignette-based human-robot interaction study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6), e13729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A. V., & Zahavi, D. (2020). Basic empathy: Developing the concept of empathy from the ground up. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 110, 103695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People-an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhahn, J., Rampton, V., & Spinas, G. A. (2018). Could artificial intelligence make doctors obsolete? BMJ, 363, k4563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honda Motor Company. (2007). The ASIMO technical robotics manual: ASIMO history and specifications. Retrieved from http://asimo.honda.com/Abstract-Technical-Information. Accessed 30 Sept 2020.

  • Hong, H., & Han, A. (2020). A systematic review on empathy measurement tools for care professionals. Educational Gerontology, 46(2), 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, J., Bizzari, V., Dambha-Miller, H., & Oxford Empathy, P. (2018a). Therapeutic empathy: What it is and what it isn’t. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(7), 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, J., Moscrop, A., Mebius, A., Fanshawe, T. R., Lewith, G., Bishop, F. L., et al. (2018b). Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, J., Steinkopf, L., Ulyte, A., Roberts, N., & Meissner, K. (2017). How empathic is your healthcare practitioner? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient surveys. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly, K. H., Ly, A. M., & Andersson, G. (2017). A fully automated conversational agent for promoting mental well-being: A pilot RCT using mixed methods. Internet Interventions, 10, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. W., Maxwell, M., Heaney, D., & Watt, G. C. (2004). The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: Development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Family Practice, 21(6), 699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppy, G., & Dowe, D. (2020). The turing test. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanica, A., Flaschner, P., Thommandram, A., Li, M., & Fossat, Y. (2019). Physicians’ perceptions of chatbots in health care: Cross-sectional web-based survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e12887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepito, J. A., & Locsin, R. (2019). Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future? International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(1), 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. (2019). Trust me, I’m a chatbot: How artificial intelligence in health care fails the turing test. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e16222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, S., Zuschnegg, J., Paletta, L., Fellner, M., Lodron, G., Steiner, J., et al. (2020). Effects of a humanoid socially assistive robot versus tablet training on psychosocial and physical outcomes of persons with dementia: Protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Research Protocols, 9(2), e14927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y., Galli, L., Ikeda, A., Itakura, S., & Kitazaki, M. (2015). Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Scientific Reports, 5, 15924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szondy, D. (2015). Robear robot care bear designed to serve Japan's aging population. Retrieved from https://newatlas.com/robear-riken/36219/. Accessed 30 Sept 2020

  • Trost, M. J., Chrysilla, G., Gold, J. I., & Mataric, M. (2020). Socially-Assistive robots using empathy to reduce pain and distress during peripheral IV placement in children. Pain Research and Management, 2020, 7935215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, LIX(236), 433–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yew, G. C. K. (2020). Trust in and ethical design of carebots: The case for ethics of care. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00653-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oxford Empathy Programme, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Humanities Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK

    Jeremy Howick & Luciano Floridi

  2. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 1 St Giles, Oxford, OX1 3JS, UK

    Jessica Morley & Luciano Floridi

  3. British Library, The Alan Turing Institute, 96 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2DB, UK

    Jessica Morley & Luciano Floridi

Authors
  1. Jeremy Howick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Morley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luciano Floridi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Howick.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howick, J., Morley, J. & Floridi, L. An Empathy Imitation Game: Empathy Turing Test for Care- and Chat-bots. Minds & Machines 31, 457–461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09555-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09555-w

Search

Navigation