Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter June 19, 2008

On Conditions of Participation: The Deficits of Public Reason

  • Marek Hrubec
From the journal Human Affairs

On Conditions of Participation: The Deficits of Public Reason

The paper analyzes the conditions of civic participation that are elucidated by criticism of the deficits of public reason. The interpretation proceeds in three steps. First, the idea of public reason and discourse is analyzed, followed by an explanation of democratic deficit and of the social deficit in the second and third steps, respectively. These deficits are analyzed as an essential limit to political and social conditions of the participation of citizens. The analysis focuses thereby on the theory of public reason by one of the most influential political philosophers of the last decades, John Rawls. The paper identifies two main pitfalls in his theory: first, the deficit following from an inadequate integration of an individual into society, which, in this case, represents democratic deficit, second, the deficit linked with underrating the socio-distributive dimension of justice, which means a social deficit.

References

Baker, C. E. Media, Markets, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, B. John Rawls and the Search for Stability. Ethics, Vol. 105, No. 4, July 1995.10.1086/293756Search in Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.). Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.10.1515/9780691234168Search in Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.10.1515/9780691186542Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. For a Democratic Society. In S. Freeman (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CCOL0521651670.003Search in Google Scholar

Dean, J. Cybersalons and Civil Society: Rethinking the Public Sphere in Transnational Technoculture. Public Culture, Vol. 13, No. 2, 243-265, Spring 2001.10.1215/08992363-13-2-243Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, N. Rethinking the Public Sphere. A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In N. Fraser. Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition. London: Routledge, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, N., Honneth, A. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: New York, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Garnham, N. The Media and the Public Sphere. In C. Calhoun, (Ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 1999 (sixth edition).Search in Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy. In S. Freeman (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CCOL0521651670.005Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCII, No. 3, 109-131, 1995.10.5840/jphil199592335Search in Google Scholar

Honneth, A. Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Hrubec, M. Mezinárodní versus globální spravedlnost. Polemika mezi nacionalisty a kosmopolity. In M. Hrubec (Ed.). Globální spravedlnost a demokracie. (Global Justice and Democracy). Prague: Filosofia, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Lipkin, R. J. Liberalism and the Possibility of Multicultucal Constitutionalism: The Distinction Between Deliberative and Dedicated Cultures. University of Richmond Law Review, Dec. 1995.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, T. Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue. Ethics 105, Oct. 1994.10.1086/293678Search in Google Scholar

Moon, J. Donald Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason: Human Rights and Global Justice. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 6, 257-274, June 2003.10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085715Search in Google Scholar

Okin, S. M. Review of Political Liberalism by John Rawls. American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, Dec. 1993.10.2307/2938838Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. Reply to Habermas. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCII, No. 3, 132-180, 1995.10.5840/jphil199592336Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. The Law of Peoples with "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited". Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999a.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus. In J. Rawls, S. Freeman (Ed.). Collected Papers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999b.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. Justice as Fairness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0Search in Google Scholar

Schwartzman, M. The Completeness of Public Reason. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 191-220, 2004.10.1177/1470594X04042963Search in Google Scholar

Sparks, C. The Internet and the Global Public Sphere. In L. Benneth, R. Entman (Eds.). Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Wuthnow, R. Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2008-6-19
Published in Print: 2008-6-1

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10023-008-0007-3/html
Scroll to top button