Skip to main content
Log in

Unenlightened Economism: The Antecedents of Bad Corporate Governance and Ethical Decline

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper expands on Goshal’s criticism of what management as a scientific discipline teaches and the effects on managerial and societal ethics. The main argument put forward is that the economisation of management has a detrimental effect on the practice of management and on society in large. The ideology of economism is described and analysed from an epistemological perspective. The paper argues that the economisation of management not only introduces the problems of economics (three are identified and discussed) but destroys the very essence of management because economics is focused on efficiency and management should be focused on effectiveness. What is more, the basic axioms of mainstream economics stand in stark contrast to the philosophy of the Enlightenment and therefore endanger the foundations of Western societies. Management theory (via corporate governance) is the Trojan horse carrying economism into society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badaracco J. L. (2001) We Don’t Need Another Hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley S. R., G. Kunda (1992) Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S. (1972) Brain of the Firm: The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization. Penguin Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis W. G., J. O’Toole (2005) How The Business School Lost Their Way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M. (1992) The Methodology of Economics: How Economists Explain. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broekstra, G.: 2001, ‹Metaphor and the Evolution of the Living Organization’, in J. Henry (ed.), Creative Management (Sage Publications, London), pp. 105–121.

  • Cross R. (1982) The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics. The Economic Journals, 92(366), 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins J. (2001) Level 5 Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F. (1964) Managing for Results. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman W., J. R. Bailey: 1998, Mediating the Fact-Value Antimony: Patterns in Managerial and Legal Rhetoric 1890–1990, Organization Science, 9(2), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayol H. (1949) General and Industrial Management. Pitman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P. (1975) Against Method. 3rd edition, Verso: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E., A. C. Wicks, B. Parmar (2004) The Stakeholder Theory “And the Corporate Objective Revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369 May–June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13.

  • Friedman M. (2002) Capitalism and Freedom (40th Anniversary Edition). University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshal S. (2005) Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg E. (1983) Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Bd. 1: Die Produktion. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F. A. von (1975) The Pretence of Knowledge. Nobel Memorial Lecture. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 77(4), 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe H.-H. (1997) On Certainty and Uncertainty, Or: How Rational Can Our Expectations Be? Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hühn M. P. (2005) What is Management? International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1(4), 290–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janov, J.: 1994, The Inventive Organization: Hope and Daring at Work (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

  • Kuhn T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1973, ‹Lectures on Scientific Method’ (London School of Economics Archives Lakatos 9/1).

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978, ‹The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1’ (posthumously Edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

  • Lindblom C. E. (1959) The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88 (Spring 1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston J. S. (1971) Myth of the Well-Educated Manager. Harvard Business Review, 49(1), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D.: 1998, The Rhetoric of Economics (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).

  • McFarland, J.: 2001, ‹Leading Quietly’, Harvard Business Review, 79(7), Special Section, 4–5.

  • Mintzberg H. (1971) Managerial Work. Analysis from Observation, Management Science, 18(2), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. (1975) The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Facts. Harvard Business Review 53(4), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. (2004) Enough Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 22–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and F. Westley: 2001, ‹Decision Making: It's Not What You Think’, Sloan Management Review, Spring, 89–93.

  • Mintzberg H., B. Ahlstrand, J. Lampel (1999) The Strategy Safari. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuschel R. P. (2005) The Servant Leader. Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord W. (2005) When Henry Mintzberg Writes, People React. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton H. J. (1952) Kantian Ethics. The Philosophical Quarterly, 2(6), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E.: 1985, Competitive Advantage (The Free Press, New York).

  • Porter M. E. (1996) What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. (1934) Logik der Forschung. Springer: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. (1965) Conjectures and Refutations. Harper and Row: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regierungskommission Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex (Government Commission on Corporate Governance): http://www.corporate-governance- code.de

  • Simon, H. A.: 1947 (1976 3rd Edition), ‹Administrative Behavior’ (Macmillan: New York).

  • Slater E. P., W. G. Bennis (1964) Democracy is Inevitable. Harvard Business Review, 42(2), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock P. E. (2000) Cognitive Biases and Organizational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure Depend on the Politics of the Beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomajan J. S. (1945) But Who is To Lead The Leader? Harvard Business Review, 23(3), 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1947, ‹Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft’, 3rd Edition (Mohr-Siebeck: Tübingen), Originally Published in 1921.

  • Williams W. A. (1923) Theory of Industrial Conduct and Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 1(3), 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöhe, G.: 2002, ‹Einführung in die Allgemeine \Betriebswirtschaftslehre, 21st Edition’ (Verlag Franz Vahlen: Munich).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Philip Huehn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huehn, M.P. Unenlightened Economism: The Antecedents of Bad Corporate Governance and Ethical Decline. J Bus Ethics 81, 823–835 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9550-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9550-x

Keywords

Navigation