Abstract
Practitioners of palliative care often argue for more resources to be provided by the state in order to lessen its reliance on charitable funding and to enable the services currently provided to some of those with terminal illnesses to be provided to all who would benefit from it. However, this is hard to justify on grounds of cost-effectiveness, since it is in the nature of palliative care that the benefits it brings to its patients are of short duration. In particular, palliative care fares badly under a policy of QALY-maximisation, since procedures which prevent premature death (provided the life is of reasonable quality) or improve quality of life for those with longer life expectancy will produce more QALYs. This paper examines various responses to this problem and argues that in order to justify increased resources for palliative care its advocates must reject the ‘atomistic’ view of the value of life implicit in the QALY approach in favour of a `holistic' or `narrative' account. This, however, has implications which advocates of palliative care may be reluctant to embrace.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daniels, N. (1985) Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1995) Life's Dominion. London: Harper Collins.
Farsides, C.C.F. (1998) Autonomy and Its Implications for Palliative Care: A Northern European Perspective. Palliative Medicine 12, 147–151.
Higginson, I. (1993) Quality, Costs and Contracts of Care. In D. Clark (Ed.), The Future for Palliative Care: Issues of Policy and Practice (pp. 30–51). Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
Materstvedt, L.J., Clark, D., Ellershaw, J., Fórde, R., Gravgaard, A.B., Müller-Busch, H.C., Sales, J.P., and Rapin, C. (2003) Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: A view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliative Medicine 17, 97–101.
Mystakidou, K., Tsilika, E., Kouloulias, V., Parpa, E., Katsouda, E., Kouvaris, J., and Vlahos, L. (2004) The “Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument (PQLI)” in terminal cancer patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2(8). Retrieved August 27, 2004 from http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/8
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2004) Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. London: NICE. Retrieved August 26, 2004 from http://www.nice.org.uk
Parfit, D. (2002). Equality and Partiality. In M. Clayton, and A. Williams (Eds.), The Ideal of Equality(pp. 81–125). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Patrick, D.L., Curtis, J.R., Engelberg, R.A., Nielsen, E., and McCown, E. (2003) Measuring and Improving the Quality of Dying and Death. Annals of Internal Medicine 139, 410–415.
Raferty, J. (2001) NICE: Faster Access to Modern Treatments? Analysis of Guidance on Health Technologies. BMJ 323, 1300–1303.
Randall, F. and Downie, R.S. (1996) Palliative Care Ethics. Oxford: OUP.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woods, S. (2002) Respect for Autonomy and Palliative Care. In H. ten Have, and D. Clark (Eds.), The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives (pp. 145–165). Buckingham: Open University Press.
World Health Organisation (2005). WHO Definition of Palliative Care. Retrieved September 13, 2005 from http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, J. Palliative Care and the QALY Problem. Health Care Anal 13, 289–301 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-8126-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-8126-0