Abstract
In his critical notice, Rosenberg (1991) raises three objections to my evolutionary account of science: whether it is more than a week metaphor, the compatibility of my past objections to reduction and my current advocacy of viewing selection in terms of replication and interaction, and finally, the feasibility of identifying appropriate replicators and interactors in biological evolution, let alone conceptual evolution. I discuss each of these objections in turn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘Classes and Cladists’, Systematic Zoology 31, 25–34.
Bradie, M.: 1991, ‘The Evolution of Scientific Lineages’, in L. Wessels, A. Fine, and M. Forbes (eds.), PSA 1990, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.
Brandon, R.N., and R. Burian (eds.): 1984, Genes, Organisms, and Populations, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene (2nd ed. 1989), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dobzhansky, T.: 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Donoghue, M.: 1990, ‘Sociology, Selection, and Success: A Critique of David Hull's Analysis of Science and Systematics’, Biology and Philosophy 5, 459–487.
Donovan, A., L. Laudan, and R. Laudan (eds.): 1988, Scrutinized Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Fogle, T.: 1990, ‘Are Genes Units of Inheritance?’, Biology and Philosophy 5, 349–371.
Glidden, C.J., and P-H. Gouyon: 1989, ‘The Units of Selection’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 204–208.
Goldman, A.I.: 1987, ‘Foundations of Social Epistemology’, Synthese 73, 109–144.
Goldman, A.I., and M. Shaked: 1991, ‘An Economic Model of Scientific Activity and Truth Acquisition’, in A. Goldman (ed.), Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, forthcoming.
Griesemer, J.R., and W.C. Wimsatt: 1989, ‘Picturing Weismannism: A Case of Conceptual Evolution’, in M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 75–137.
Haldane, J.B.S.: 1964, ‘A Defense of Bean Bag Genetics’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 7, 343–359.
Hoffman, A.: 1989, Arguments on Evolution: A Paleontologist's Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hull, D.L., P. Tessner, and A. Diamond: 1978, ‘Planck's Principle’, Science 202, 717–723.
Kitcher, P.: 1990, ‘The Division of Cognitive Labor’, The Journal of Philosophy 87, 5–22.
Kitcher, P.: 1991, ‘Authority, Deference, and the Role of Individual Reason’, in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimension of Scientific Knowledge, Note Dame University Press, Notre Dame.
Lakatos, I.: 1971, ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction’, in R.S. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 91–136.
Lloyd, E.A.: 1988, The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Greenwood Press, New Jersey.
Maynard-Smith, J.: 1988, ‘Mechanisms of Advance’, Science 242, 1182–1183.
Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Rosenberg, A.: 1985, The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenberg, A.: 1991, ‘Selection and Science: Critical Notice of David Hull's Sciences as a Process’, Biology and Philosophy 7, 217–228.
Schaffner, K.: 1967, ‘Antireductionism and Molecular Biology’, Science 157, 644–647.
Schaffner, K.: 1992, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, forthcoming.
Tuomi, J., and T. Vuorisalo: 1989, ‘Hierarchical Selection in Modular Organisms’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 209–213.
Vrba, E.S.: 1989, ‘Levels of Selection and Sorting with Special Reference to the Species Level’, Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology 6, 111–168.
Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Williams, G.C.: 1985, ‘A Defense of Reductionism in Evolutionary Biology’, in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–27.
Williams, M.B.: 1989, ‘Evolvers are Individuals: Extension of the Species as Individuals, in M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Kluwer Press, Dordrecht, pp. 301–308.
Waters, C.K.: 1990, ‘Why the Anti-reductionist Consensus Won't Survive the Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics,’ in L. Wessels, A. Fine, and M. Forbes (eds.), PSA 1990, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hull, D.L. An evolutionary account of science: A response to Rosenberg's critical notice. Biol Philos 7, 229–236 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129887
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129887