Abstract
Mencius’ aesthetics unfolded around the ideal personality in his mind. Such an ideal personality belonged to a great man who was sublime, practical and honorable, and it was presented as the beauty of magnificence or the beauty of masculinity. Mencius put forward many propositions such as “the completed goodness that is brightly displayed is called greatness,” nourishing “one’s grand qi 气 (the great morale personality),” “only after a man is a sage can he completely suits himself to his own form,” “the saints only apprehended before me that of which my mind approves along with other men,” being “conscious of sincerity on self-examination,” and flowing “abroad, above and beneath, like that of Heaven and Earth,” all of which described an ideal personality through the course of its formation and its psychological experience. As a prominent school before the Qin dynasty, Mencius’ aesthetics greatly developed the Confucian teaching of “internal sage.” It shared many similarities with Zhuangzi’s thought and was also an aesthetic mode opposed to the latter. Both kinds of aesthetics were prominent: Mencius’ teaching was like imposingly towering and muscularly overflowing majestic mountains; Zhuangzi’s thought was like gracefully flowing water with an air of femininity. In real life though, Mencius’ teaching has greater practical significance in addressing the unbearable lightness of being, a disease of modernity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle (1999). Selected Works of Aristotle: Volume of Ethics (Chinese Edition). Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe
Aristotle (2005). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by C. C. W. Taylor. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press
Cheng Hao, and Cheng Yi (2000). Er Cheng Yishu 二程遗书 (Collected Works of Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi), Vol. 18. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe
Han Yu (2005). “Yuan Dao” 原道 (“On the Source of the Dao”). In: Han Changli Wenji Jiaozhu 韩昌黎文集校注 (Collation and Annotation on the Writings of Han Changli). Taibeixian: Dingyuan Wenhua Shiye Youxian Gongsi
Hu Jiaxing (2003). “Zhuangzi Meixue de Jiben Tedian Jiqi Xiandai Yiyi” 庄子美学的基本特点及其现代意义 (“The Basic Characteristics and Modern Significance of Zhuangzi’s Aesthetics”). Zhongnan Minzu Daxue Xuebao, (4): 97–102
Kant, I. (1952). The Critique of Judgment, Section 59. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Lu Jiuyuan (1980). Lu Jiuyuan Ji 陆九渊集 (Collected Works of Lu Jiuyuan), Vol. 34. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Mou Zongsan (1992). “Zhongguo Wenhua de Tezhi” 中国文化的特质 (“The Characteristics of Chinese Culture”). In: Daode Lixiang Zhuyi de Chongjian 道德理想主义的重建 (The Reconstruction of Moral Idealism). Beijing: Zhongguo Guangbo Dianshi Chubanshe
Nietzsche, F. W. (1995). The Birth of Tragedy. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
von Schiller, J. C. F. (2003). Letters upon the Aesthetic Education of Man (Chinese Edition). Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe
Xu Fuguan (1987). Zhongguo Yishu Jingshen 中国艺术精神 (The Spirit of Art in China). Shenyang: Chunfeng Wenyi Chubanshe
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, J. Mencius’ aesthetics and its position. Front. Philos. China 6, 41–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0124-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0124-8