Skip to main content
Log in

Mencius’ aesthetics and its position

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Abstract

Mencius’ aesthetics unfolded around the ideal personality in his mind. Such an ideal personality belonged to a great man who was sublime, practical and honorable, and it was presented as the beauty of magnificence or the beauty of masculinity. Mencius put forward many propositions such as “the completed goodness that is brightly displayed is called greatness,” nourishing “one’s grand qi 气 (the great morale personality),” “only after a man is a sage can he completely suits himself to his own form,” “the saints only apprehended before me that of which my mind approves along with other men,” being “conscious of sincerity on self-examination,” and flowing “abroad, above and beneath, like that of Heaven and Earth,” all of which described an ideal personality through the course of its formation and its psychological experience. As a prominent school before the Qin dynasty, Mencius’ aesthetics greatly developed the Confucian teaching of “internal sage.” It shared many similarities with Zhuangzi’s thought and was also an aesthetic mode opposed to the latter. Both kinds of aesthetics were prominent: Mencius’ teaching was like imposingly towering and muscularly overflowing majestic mountains; Zhuangzi’s thought was like gracefully flowing water with an air of femininity. In real life though, Mencius’ teaching has greater practical significance in addressing the unbearable lightness of being, a disease of modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle (1999). Selected Works of Aristotle: Volume of Ethics (Chinese Edition). Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2005). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by C. C. W. Taylor. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Hao, and Cheng Yi (2000). Er Cheng Yishu 二程遗书 (Collected Works of Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi), Vol. 18. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Yu (2005). “Yuan Dao” 原道 (“On the Source of the Dao”). In: Han Changli Wenji Jiaozhu 韩昌黎文集校注 (Collation and Annotation on the Writings of Han Changli). Taibeixian: Dingyuan Wenhua Shiye Youxian Gongsi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Jiaxing (2003). “Zhuangzi Meixue de Jiben Tedian Jiqi Xiandai Yiyi” 庄子美学的基本特点及其现代意义 (“The Basic Characteristics and Modern Significance of Zhuangzi’s Aesthetics”). Zhongnan Minzu Daxue Xuebao, (4): 97–102

  • Kant, I. (1952). The Critique of Judgment, Section 59. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Jiuyuan (1980). Lu Jiuyuan Ji 陆九渊集 (Collected Works of Lu Jiuyuan), Vol. 34. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou Zongsan (1992). “Zhongguo Wenhua de Tezhi” 中国文化的特质 (“The Characteristics of Chinese Culture”). In: Daode Lixiang Zhuyi de Chongjian 道德理想主义的重建 (The Reconstruction of Moral Idealism). Beijing: Zhongguo Guangbo Dianshi Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. W. (1995). The Birth of Tragedy. New York: Dover Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller, J. C. F. (2003). Letters upon the Aesthetic Education of Man (Chinese Edition). Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Fuguan (1987). Zhongguo Yishu Jingshen 中国艺术精神 (The Spirit of Art in China). Shenyang: Chunfeng Wenyi Chubanshe

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaxiang Hu.

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, J. Mencius’ aesthetics and its position. Front. Philos. China 6, 41–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0124-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0124-8

Keywords

Navigation