Abstract
In order to ensure that corporations act in socially responsible ways. R. Freeman says that firms should be legally required to act in accordance with the directives of a moral theory which he developed especially for business – a theory which has come to be called "normative stakeholder theory" (NST). I argue that NST fails as a moral theory and that this failure indicates: (1) that we should abandon the quest to develop a special moral theory for use in business, and (2) that we should not attempt to impose the use of any moral theory upon business, but rather should allow corporations to determine their moral responsibilities in any way they see fit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeder, Robert: 1992, ‘Morality in the Marketplace’, in Milton Snoeyenobos, Robert Almeder and James Humber (eds.), Business Ethics, Revised edition (Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY), pp. 82-91.
Blackstone, William: 1975, ‘The American 220 James M. Humber Psychological Association Code of Ethics for Research Involving Human Participants: An Appraisal’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy (Winter), 408-420.
Boatright, John: 1997, ‘The Corporation and Society’, in John Boatright (ed.), Ethics and the Conduct of Business, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 358-369.
Bowie, Norman: 1991, ‘New Directions in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Business Horizons 34, 56-65.
Bowie, Norman: 1999, ‘A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics’, in Robert Frederick (ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.), pp. 3-16.
Evan, William and R. Edward Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in Thomas Beauchamp and Norman Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 84-92.
Frederick, Robert (ed.): 1999, A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.).
Freeman, R. Edward: 1997, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in Thomas Bauchamp and Norman Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 66-76.
Freeman, R. Edward: 1997, ‘Stakeholder Theory’, in Patricia Werhane and R. Edward Freeman (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.), pp. 602-606.
Friedman, Milton: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits’, The New York Times Magazine 33 (September 13), 122-126.
Friedman, Milton: 1972, ‘Milton Friedman Responds’, Business and Society Review (Spring), 10-12.
Goodpaster, Kenneth: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 63-70.
Humber, James: 1980, ‘Milton Friedman and the Corporate Executive’s Conscience’, Philosophy in Context 10, 71-80.
Korsgaard, Christine: 1996, Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, New York).
Marcoux, Alexi: 2000, ‘Balancing Act’, in Joseph Dejardins and John McCall (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, 4th ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA), pp. 92-100.
Rachels, James; 1988, The Elements of Moral Reasoning (Random House, New York, NY).
Snoeyenbos, Milton, Robert Almeder and James Humber: 1992, ‘Introduction’, in Milton Snoeyenbos, Robert Almeder and James Humber (eds.), Business Ethics, Revised Edition (Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY), pp. 72-82.
Snoeyenbos, Milton and James Humber: 1999, ‘Utilitarianism and Business Ethics’, in Robert Frederick (ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humber, J.M. Beyond Stockholders and Stakeholders: A Plea for Corporate Moral Autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics 36, 207–221 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014061326967
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014061326967