Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:09:19.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Assembling Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Starting with the view that methodological constraints depend upon the nature of the system investigated, a tripartite division between theoretical, semitheoretical, and empirical discoveries is made. Many nanosystems can only be investigated semitheoretically or empirically, and this aspect leads to some nanophenomena being weakly emergent. Self-assembling systems are used as an example, their existence suggesting that the class of systems that is not Kim-reducible may be quite large.

Type
Simulation, Instrumentation, and Representation at the Nanoscale
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedau, Mark (2003), “Downward Causation and the Autonomy of Weak Emergence,” Principia Revista Internacional de Epistemologica 6:550.Google Scholar
Curtis, Lorenzo J. (2003), Atomic Structure and Lifetimes: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (2004), Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, and Scientific Method. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1999), “Making Sense of Emergence,” Philosophical Studies 95:336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, J. E., and Stoddart, J. F. (1995), “Towards Molecular and Supramolecular Devices,” in Welland, M. E. and Gimzewski, J. K. (eds.), Ultimate Limits of Fabrication and Measurement. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 18.Google Scholar