Abstract
The paper argues that ‘All varieties of gratitude are only overall fitting when targeted towards agents,’ for instance that any variety of gratitude for the beautiful sunset is only overall fitting if a supernatural agent such as God exists. The first premise is that ‘Prepositional gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ For this premise, intuitive judgments are offered. The second premise is that ‘Prepositional gratitude is the paradigmatic variety of gratitude.’ For this premise, an aspect of the common consent of philosophers about gratitude is noted and the metaphysical basicness of prepositional gratitude is argued for. This gives the intermediate conclusion that ‘The paradigmatic variety of gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ The fourth premise is that ‘If the paradigmatic variety of gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents, then all varieties of gratitude are overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ To supply the conditional of this premise, the Paradigmatic Fittingness Principle is offered, which states that ‘Paradigmatic emotions set the fittingness conditions for their non-paradigmatic varieties.’ This principle is argued for by noting that it vindicates some popular and plausible intuitive judgements and gives an error theory of why one might think that gratitude could be fittingly targeted towards non-agents, and by suggesting the absence of any other plausible source of fittingness conditions for non-paradigmatic emotions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As a reviewer’s comment leads me to emphasize, an emotion like gratitude is therefore only fitting if there are really such things as agents. Similarly, I take no stand on various disputed cases about what things count as agents, e.g., whether governments or corporations are agents.
I suggest only that the prototype way of approaching this topic seems the most fruitful, rather than relying on the more sweeping claim that the prototype theory of concepts is the correct one (Margolis and Laurence 2019).
References
Allen, C., & Neal, J. (2020). Teleological notions in biology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleology-biology/
Bardsley, K. (2013). Mother nature and the mother of all virtues: on the rationality of feeling gratitude toward nature. Environmental Ethics, 35(1), 27–40.
Berger, F. (1975). Gratitude. Ethics, 85(4), 298–309.
Bishop, J. (2012). Solomon on spirituality. In K. Higgins & D. Sherman (Eds.), Passion, death, and spirituality: the philosophy of Robert C. Solomon (pp. 245–258). New York: Springer.
Blatty, W. P. (1980). The ninth configuration. St. Louis: Warner Bros.
Boleyn-Fitzgerald, P. (2016). Gratitude towards things. In D. Carr (Ed.), Perspectives on gratitude: an interdisciplinary approach (pp. 112–125). Abingdon: Routledge.
Camenisch, P. (1981). Gift and gratitude in ethics. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 9(1), 1–34.
Carr, D. (2016). Counting blessings: towards a spiritual conception of gratitude. In D. Carr (Ed.), Perspectives on gratitude: an interdisciplinary approach (pp. 169–181). Abingdon: Routledge.
Chastain, D. (2016). Gifts without givers: secular spirituality and metaphorical cognition. Sophia, 56(4), 631–647.
Hieronymi, P. (2005). The wrong kind of reason. Journal of Philosophy, 102(9), 437–457.
Howard, C. (2018). Fittingness. Philosophy Compass, 13(11), 1–14.
Lacewing, M. (2016). Can non-theists appropriately feel existential gratitude? Religious Studies, 52(2), 145–165.
Lewis, C. S. (1952). Mere Christianity. London: MacMillan.
Manela, T. (2016). Gratitude and appreciation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 53(3), 281–294.
Manela, T. (2018). Gratitude to nature. Environmental Values, 27(6), 623–644.
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2019). Concepts. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/
Marquis, D. (2013). An argument that abortion is wrong. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical theory: an anthology second Edi (pp. 400–409). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
McAleer, S. (2012). Propositional gratitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(1), 55–66.
McConnell, T. (1993). Gratitude. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266.
McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorf, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaptation for altruism? The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 281–85.
McHugh, C., & Way, J. (2016). Fittingness first. Ethics, 126(3), 575–606.
Nowak, M. A., & Roch, S. (2007). Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 605–9.
Roberts, R. C. (2004). The blessings of gratitude: a conceptual analysis. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rush, M. (2019). Motivating propositional gratitude (pp. 1–21). Online: Philosophical Studies.
Scarantino, A. (2018). Emotion. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/
Solomon, R. C. (2002). Spirituality for the skeptic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Srinivasan, A. (2018). The aptness of anger. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(2), 123–144.
Walker, A. D. M. (1981). Gratefulness and gratitude. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81(1), 39–55.
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.
Acknowledgements
For their conversation on this topic or comments on earlier versions of this paper thanks to Nicholas Allmaier, Nathan Biebel, Bruce Brower, Eric Brown, Drew Chastain, Daniel Dzah, Trevor Griffith, Jesse Hill, Corey Horn, Eli Landau, Matti Mortimore, Payten Parfait, Nicholas Sars, David Shoemaker, Daniel Tigard, Alyssa Walker, Geoffrey Weiss. Thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Thanks to participants at the 2019 Wisconsin Philosophical Association Conference and the 2018 Boston College Graduate Philosophy Conference.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, M.W. Gratitude Is Only Fittingly Targeted Towards Agents. SOPHIA 61, 345–363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00811-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00811-7