Skip to main content
Log in

Gratitude Is Only Fittingly Targeted Towards Agents

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues that ‘All varieties of gratitude are only overall fitting when targeted towards agents,’ for instance that any variety of gratitude for the beautiful sunset is only overall fitting if a supernatural agent such as God exists. The first premise is that ‘Prepositional gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ For this premise, intuitive judgments are offered. The second premise is that ‘Prepositional gratitude is the paradigmatic variety of gratitude.’ For this premise, an aspect of the common consent of philosophers about gratitude is noted and the metaphysical basicness of prepositional gratitude is argued for. This gives the intermediate conclusion that ‘The paradigmatic variety of gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ The fourth premise is that ‘If the paradigmatic variety of gratitude is overall fitting only when targeted towards agents, then all varieties of gratitude are overall fitting only when targeted towards agents.’ To supply the conditional of this premise, the Paradigmatic Fittingness Principle is offered, which states that ‘Paradigmatic emotions set the fittingness conditions for their non-paradigmatic varieties.’ This principle is argued for by noting that it vindicates some popular and plausible intuitive judgements and gives an error theory of why one might think that gratitude could be fittingly targeted towards non-agents, and by suggesting the absence of any other plausible source of fittingness conditions for non-paradigmatic emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As a reviewer’s comment leads me to emphasize, an emotion like gratitude is therefore only fitting if there are really such things as agents. Similarly, I take no stand on various disputed cases about what things count as agents, e.g., whether governments or corporations are agents.

  2. I suggest only that the prototype way of approaching this topic seems the most fruitful, rather than relying on the more sweeping claim that the prototype theory of concepts is the correct one (Margolis and Laurence 2019).

References

  • Allen, C., & Neal, J. (2020). Teleological notions in biology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleology-biology/

  • Bardsley, K. (2013). Mother nature and the mother of all virtues: on the rationality of feeling gratitude toward nature. Environmental Ethics, 35(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, F. (1975). Gratitude. Ethics, 85(4), 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2012). Solomon on spirituality. In K. Higgins & D. Sherman (Eds.), Passion, death, and spirituality: the philosophy of Robert C. Solomon (pp. 245–258). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blatty, W. P. (1980). The ninth configuration. St. Louis: Warner Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boleyn-Fitzgerald, P. (2016). Gratitude towards things. In D. Carr (Ed.), Perspectives on gratitude: an interdisciplinary approach (pp. 112–125). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camenisch, P. (1981). Gift and gratitude in ethics. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 9(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2016). Counting blessings: towards a spiritual conception of gratitude. In D. Carr (Ed.), Perspectives on gratitude: an interdisciplinary approach (pp. 169–181). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chastain, D. (2016). Gifts without givers: secular spirituality and metaphorical cognition. Sophia, 56(4), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieronymi, P. (2005). The wrong kind of reason. Journal of Philosophy, 102(9), 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C. (2018). Fittingness. Philosophy Compass, 13(11), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacewing, M. (2016). Can non-theists appropriately feel existential gratitude? Religious Studies, 52(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1952). Mere Christianity. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manela, T. (2016). Gratitude and appreciation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 53(3), 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manela, T. (2018). Gratitude to nature. Environmental Values, 27(6), 623–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2019). Concepts. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/

  • Marquis, D. (2013). An argument that abortion is wrong. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical theory: an anthology second Edi (pp. 400–409). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAleer, S. (2012). Propositional gratitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, T. (1993). Gratitude. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorf, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaptation for altruism? The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 281–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, C., & Way, J. (2016). Fittingness first. Ethics, 126(3), 575–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Roch, S. (2007). Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (2004). The blessings of gratitude: a conceptual analysis. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, M. (2019). Motivating propositional gratitude (pp. 1–21). Online: Philosophical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarantino, A. (2018). Emotion. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/

  • Solomon, R. C. (2002). Spirituality for the skeptic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, A. (2018). The aptness of anger. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. D. M. (1981). Gratefulness and gratitude. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For their conversation on this topic or comments on earlier versions of this paper thanks to Nicholas Allmaier, Nathan Biebel, Bruce Brower, Eric Brown, Drew Chastain, Daniel Dzah, Trevor Griffith, Jesse Hill, Corey Horn, Eli Landau, Matti Mortimore, Payten Parfait, Nicholas Sars, David Shoemaker, Daniel Tigard, Alyssa Walker, Geoffrey Weiss. Thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Thanks to participants at the 2019 Wisconsin Philosophical Association Conference and the 2018 Boston College Graduate Philosophy Conference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus William Hunt.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunt, M.W. Gratitude Is Only Fittingly Targeted Towards Agents. SOPHIA 61, 345–363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00811-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00811-7

Keywords

Navigation