Skip to main content

Paleontology: Outrunning Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 326))

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss several temporal aspects of paleontology from a philosophical perspective. I begin by presenting the general problem of “taming” deep time to make it comprehensible at a human scale, starting with the traditional geologic time scale: an event-based, relative time scale consisting of a hierarchy of chronological units. Not only does the relative timescale provide a basis for reconstructing many of the general features of the history of life, but it is also consonant with the cognitive processes humans use to think about time. Absolute dating of rocks, fossils, and evolutionary events (such as branching events on the tree of life) can be accomplished through the use of radiometric dating, chronological signals extractable from fossil growth patterns, and the “molecular clock.” Sometimes these different methods of absolute dating, which start from largely independent assumptions and evidentiary bases, converge in their temporal estimates, resulting in a consilience of inductions. At other times they fail to agree, either because fossils and molecules are giving temporal information about different aspects of nature and should not be expected to agree, or because of flawed assumptions that give rise to an inaccurate estimate. I argue that in general, despite the fact that it can be difficult to integrate disparate kinds of evidence, the principle of total evidence should be applied to the dating of evolutionary events. As a historical science, paleontology studies past events we cannot observe directly. This raises questions of epistemic access, meaning that due to the fragmentary nature of the fossil record we may find ourselves without access to the relevant traces to adjudicate between rival hypotheses about the past. The problems and prospects of epistemic access are explored through a case study of the reconstruction of the colors of dinosaurs. The paper closes with a reflection on the Darwin-Lyell metaphor of the fossil record as a highly fragmentary history book, and a call for a reconsideration of the book metaphor in favor of a systems view of the geologic and fossil records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Perhaps surprisingly, although the molecular clock is often associated with the neutral theory of molecular evolution (Dietrich and Skipper 2007), Zuckerkandl and Pauling were operating within a selectionist framework (Morgan 1998). Essentially, they assumed that functional constraints on substitution were sufficiently steady as to allow substitution rate to serve as an approximate indicator of elapsed time (Morgan 1998). For more on the neutral model and its influence on paleontology , see Huss (2009).

References

  • Benton, M.J., P.C.J. Donoghue, and R.J. Asher. 2009. Calibrating and constraining molecular clocks. In The Timetree of Life, ed. S.B. Hedges and S. Kumar, 35–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, U., P.L. Manning, and R.A. Wogelius. 2012. Chemical mapping of paleontological and archeological artifacts with synchrotron X-Rays. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 5: 361–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjonerud, M. 2005. Reading the rocks: The autobiography of the earth. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brochu, C.A., C.D. Sumrall, and J.M. Theodor. 2004. When clocks (And Communities) collide: Estimating divergence time from molecules and the fossil record. Journal of Paleontology 78: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromham, L. (2006). Molecular dates for the cambrian explosion: Is the light at the end of the tunnel an oncoming train? Palaeontologia Electronica 9(1.2E). http://palaeo-electronica.org/paleo/toc9_1.htm.

  • Cleland, C.E. 2002. Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69: 447–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colleary, C., et al. 2015. Chemical, experimental, and morphological evidence for diagenetically altered melanin in exceptionally preserved fossils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (41): 12592–12597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, C.J., and M.L. van Tuinen. 2003. Extracting time from phylogenies: Positive interplay between fossil and genetic data. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 444–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, G., and A. Brongniart. 1808. Essai sur la géographie minéralogique des environs de Paris. Annales du Musée Histoire Naturelle de Paris 11: 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alba, L., L. Kieffer, and M.D. Shawkey. 2012. Relative contributions of pigments and biophotonic nanostructures to natural color production: A case study in budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) feathers. The Journal of Experimental Biology 215 (8): 1272–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M.R., and R.A. Skipper Jr. 2007. Manipulating underdetermination in scientific controversy: The case of the molecular clock. Perspectives on Science 15: 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, P.C. and Benton, M.J., 2007. Rocks and clocks: Calibrating the Tree of Life using fossils and molecules. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(8): 424–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. 2010. Engagement for progress: Applied philosophy of science in context. Synthese 177: 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, S., C. Collet, and D. Betty. 1995. The Mammalian Molecular Clock. Austin: R. G. Lands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbighausen, R., and D. Korn. 2013. Paleontology as a circumstantial evidence lawsuit. Historical Biology 25: 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution 25: 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., and S.J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Models in paleobiology, ed. T.J.M. Schopf, 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, D.H. 2014. Temporal acuity and the rate and dynamics of mass extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (9): 3203–3204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Was the Ediacaran–Cambrian radiation a unique evolutionary event? Paleobiology 41: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D.C., M. Foote, D.L. Fox, and L.R. Leighton. 2002. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction: Comment on smith. Journal of Paleontology 76: 585–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, M., J.P. Hunter, C.M. Janis, and J.J. Sepkoski Jr. 1999. Evolutionary and preservational constraints on origins of biologic groups: Divergence times of eutherian mammals. Science 283: 1310–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forber, P. 2009. Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence. Biology and Philosophy 24: 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forber, P., and E. Griffith. 2011. Historical reconstruction: Gaining epistemic access to the deep past. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 3: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M.R., and E. Sober. 1994. How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less Ad Hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.L., and D.C. Fisher. 2004. Dietary reconstruction of Miocene Gomphotherium (Mammalia, Proboscidea) from the Great Plains region, USA, based on the carbon isotope composition of tusk and molar enamel. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 206: 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1970. Evolutionary paleontology and the science of form. Earth-Science Reviews 6: 77–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. The return of hopeful monsters. Natural History 86: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, T. 2004. Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of science. Philosophy of Science 71: 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa, M., J.L. Thorne, and H. Kishino. 2003. Time scale of eutherian evolution estimated without assuming a constant rate of molecular evolution. Genes & Genetic Systems 78: 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck, J.P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Systematic Biology 44: 17–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, W.W. 1985. Planetary rotation and invertebrate skeletal patterns: Prospects for extant taxa. Geophysical Surveys 7: 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huss, J.E. 2009. The shape of evolution: The MBL model and clade shape. In The paleobiological revolution: Essays on the growth of modern paleontology, ed. D. Sepkoski and M. Ruse, 326–345. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., L. Hedges, and V. Prohaska. 1988. Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review 95: 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffares, B. 2010. Guessing the future of the past. Biology and Philosophy 25: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (2011). Defining the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: A practical guide and return to first principles. In The end-Cretaceous mass extinction and the Chicxulub impact in Texas. SEPM Special Publication 100, eds. Gerta Keller and Thierry Adatte, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., and S.B. Hedges. 1998. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392: 917–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., K.-Q. Gao, J. Vinther, M.D. Shawkey, J.A. Clarke, L. D’Alba, Q. Meng, D.E.G. Briggs, and R.O. Prum. 2010. Plumage color patterns of an extinct dinosaur. Science 327: 1369–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., K.Q. Gao, Q. Meng, J.A. Clarke, M.D. Shawkey, L. D’Alba, R. Pei, M. Ellison, M.A. Norell, and J. Vinther. 2012. Reconstruction of Microraptor and the evolution of iridescent plumage. Science 335: 1215–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1984. Paleontology at the high table. Nature 309: 401–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press at Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Speciation and macroevolution. Evolution 36: 1119–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder, R., and M. Arima. 2005. Tidal rhythmites and their implications. Earth-Science Reviews 69: 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKellar, R.C., B.D.E. Chatterton, A.P. Wolfe, and P.J. Currie. 2011. A diverse assemblage of late Cretaceous dinosaur and bird feathers from Canadian amber. Science 333: 1619–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, J. 1981. Basin and Range. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, A.D. 2004. Empiricism and model building in stratigraphy: The historical roots of present-day practices. Stratigraphy 1: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.J. 1998. Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965. Journal of the History of Biology 31: 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, A. E., Zheng, W., Johnson, E. A., Lamanna, M. C., Li D., Lacovara, K. J. & Schweitzer, M. H. (2014). Melanosomes or microbes: Testing an alternative hypothesis for the origin of microbodies in fossil feathers. Science Reports 4: Article number 4233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, N.D. 1959. The nature of the fossil record. In Commemoration of the centennial of the publication of “The Origin of Species” by Charles Darwin. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103 (2): 264–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966. Problems of geochronology. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 118: 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S.E. 2007. The problem with the Paleozoic. Paleobiology 33: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S. E. 2011. A new view of the sedimentary rock record: Drivers of Earth system evolution are encoded by gaps and rocks. The Outcrop, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S.E., and R.R. Gaines. 2012. Formation of the ‘Great Unconformity’ as a trigger for the Cambrian explosion. Nature 484: 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S.E., and N.A. Heim. 2011. Macrostratigraphy and macroevolution in marine environments: Testing the common-cause hypothesis. In Comparing the geological and fossil records: Implications for biodiversity studies, ed. A.J. McGowan and A.B. Smith, 95–104. London: Geological Society, Special Publication 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. 1829. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire. York: T. Wilson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompea, S.M., P.G.K. Kahn, and R.B. Culver. 1979. Paleoastronomy and nautiloid growth: A perspective. Vistas in Astronomy 23: 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raup, D.M., and J.J. Sepkoski Jr. 1984. Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81: 801–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, I., Shipley, T. F., Newcombe, N., Massey, C., Wills, T. (2012). Examining the representation and understanding of large magnitudes using the hierarchical alignment model of analogical reasoning. CSS 2012 Conference Proceedings, 917–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M.J.S. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runcorn, S.K. 1966a. Corals as paleontological clocks. Scientific American 215 (4): 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966b. Middle Devonian day and month. Science 154: 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrutton, C.T., and R.G. Hipkin. 1973. Long-term changes in the rotation rate of the earth. Earth-Science Reviews 9: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, A., and R.I. Murchison. 1839. Classification of the older stratified rocks of Devonshire and Cornwall. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science Series 3. 14: 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, D. 2012. Rereading the fossil record: The growth of paleobiology as an evolutionary discipline. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S.-Z., et al. 2011. Calibrating the end-permian mass extinction. Science 334: 1367–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisterna, P.D., and H. Vucetich. 1994. Cosmology, oscillating physics, and oscillating biology. Physical Review Letters 72: 454–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. 1799. Tabular view of the order of strata in the vicinity of Bath with their respective organic remains.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.B. 2000. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction. Journal of Paleontology 74: 763–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 2009. Absence of evidence and evidence of absence: Evidential transitivity in connection with fossils, fishing, fine-tuning, and firing squads. Philosophical Studies 143: 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., and M. Steel. 2014. Time and knowability in evolutionary processes. Philosophy of Science 81: 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S.M., and M.J. Wagner. 1987. A substantial bias in nonparametric tests for periodicity in geophysical data. Science 238: 940–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Testing for periodicity of extinction. Science 241: 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. 2005a. Local underdetermination in historical science. Philosophy of Science 72: 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. Misleading observable analogues in paleontology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Making prehistory: Historical science and the scientific realism debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vinther, J. 2015. A guide to the field of palaeo colour. BioEssays 37(6): 643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinther, J., D.E.G. Briggs, R.O. Prum, and V. Saranathan. 2008. The colour of fossil feathers. Biology Letters 4 (5): 522–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacey, D., M.R. Kilburn, M. Saunders, J. Cliff, and M.D. Brasier. 2011. Microfossils of sulphur-metabolizing cells in 3.4-billion-year-old rocks of Western Australia. Nature Geoscience 4: 698–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J.W. 1963. Coral growth and geochronometry. Nature 197: 948–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W. 1840. Aphorisms Concerning Ideas, Science, and the Language of Science. London: Harrison and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1858. Novum Organon Renovatum. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.C., H. Ochman, and E.M. Prager. 1987. Molecular time scale for evolution. Trends in Genetics 3: 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C. 1981. Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In Scientific inquiry in the social sciences (a festschrift for Donald T. Campbell), ed. M. Brewer & B. Collins, 123–162. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. False models as a means to truer theories. In Neutral models in biology, ed. M. Nitecki and A. Hoffmann, 23–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, S. 2002. The Map that Changed the World: William Smith and the Birth of Modern Geology. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, E., and L. Pauling. 1962. Molecular disease, evolution and genetic heterogeneity. In Horizons in biochemistry: Albert Szent-Györgyi dedicatory volume, ed. M. Kasha and B. Pullman, 189–225. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In Evolving genes and proteins, ed. V. Bryson and H. Vogel, 97–166. New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper began as a talk given at the University of Bordeaux, and benefited from feedback received from my fellow symposiasts. My thanks go out to Christophe Bouton, Sharon Cebula, Patrick Forber , Todd Grantham, Philippe Huneman, Shanan Peters, David Sepkoski , Matt Shawkey and Joanna Trzeciak for their comments on the manuscript, and to John Alroy and Douglas Erwin for discussion. I also thank Carl Mendelson at Beloit College for introducing me to the idea of Deep Time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Huss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huss, J. (2017). Paleontology: Outrunning Time. In: Bouton, C., Huneman, P. (eds) Time of Nature and the Nature of Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics