Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One area of business performance of particular interest to both scholars and practitioners is corporate social responsibility. The notion that organizations should be attentive to the needs of constituents other than shareholders has been investigated and vigorously debated for over two decades. This has provoked an especially rich and diverse literature investigating the relationship between business and society. As a result, researchers have urged the study of the profiles and backgrounds of corporate upper echelons in order to better understand this relationship.

There is ample evidence that corporations have in recent years increased the proportion of outside directors on their boards. This has been partly in reaction to increased interest in the corporate social responsiveness of business organizations and suggestions that the board of directors could play a unique role in this area. The expectation on the part of practitioners, researchers, and governmental regulators is that outside directors will advocate greater corporate responsiveness to society's needs by playing a more active role in overseeing managerial decisions.

The purpose of this study is to partially fill a void in the literature by determining whether or not these expectations are justified, particularly in the service industry. Data were collected as part of a larger cross-national study of corporate social responsibility. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the results of a survey of 307 board members (198 outside and 109 inside directors) indicates that outside directors exhibit greater concern about the discretionary component of corporate responsibility and a weaker orientation toward economic performance. No significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to the legal and ethical dimensions of corporate social responsibility. Some explanations as well as limited generalizations and implications are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, K. R.: 1984, 'Difficulties in Overseeing Ethical Policy', California Management Review 26, 133-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R: 1980, 'Directors' Responsibility for Corporate Strategy', Harvard Business Review 30.

  • Angelidis, J. and N. Ibrahim: 1991, 'Toward a Contingency Model of Corporate Social Responsibility', Proceedings of the Institute of Management Sciences Southeastern, Chapter 24-26.

  • Aupperle, K., A. B. Carroll and J. Hatfield: 1985, 'An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability', Academy of Management Journal 28, 446-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron's: 1986, 'A Plague of Lawyers', 38-39.

  • Berenbeim, R.: 1988, 'An Outbreak of Ethics', Across the Board, 14-19.

  • Bowen, W. C.: 1995, Inside the Boardroom: Governance by Directors and Trustees (John Wiley and Sons, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1991, 'The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Board Members in the Service Industry 399 Management of Organizational Stakeholders', Business Horizons 34(4), 39-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1989, Business and Society (South-Western, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, 'A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 4, 497-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: 1992, Spring, 'Corporate Behavior: Fewer Flaws Mean Fewer Laws', Business and Society Review 81, 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firstenberg, P. and B. Malkiel: 1980, 'Why Corporate Boards Need Independent Directors', Management Review 69, 26-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. and F. McLaughlin: 1980, 'Perceptions of Social Responsible Activities and Attitudes: A Comparison of Business School Deans and Corporate Chief Executives', Academy of Management Journal 27, 658-676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.: 1983, 'Corporate Social Responsibility in the Reagan Era and Beyond', California Management Review 25, 145-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pittman, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchsberg, G.: 1993, March, 'Chief Executives See Their Power Shrink', Wall Street Journal, B1, B3.

  • Galen, M.: 1992, Guilty! Too Many Lawyers and Too Much Litigation, Business Week (April), 60-65.

  • Geneen, H.: 1984a, Managing (Doubleday & Co., Inc., NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneen, H.: 1984b, September, 'Why Directors Can't Protect the Shareholders', Fortune 28.

  • Goldstein, J., K. Gautum and W. Boeker: 1994, 'The Effects of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change', Strategic Management Journal 15, 241-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham and W. Black: 1992, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (Macmillan Publishing Company, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. and P. Mason: 1984, 'Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers', Academy of Management Review 9, 193-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T.: 2001, 'Establishing Effective Boards', Financial Executive 17, 39-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S.: 1976, 'Executive Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility', Business Horizons 19, 34-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1996, 'Response to 'Do Good Ethics Always Make for Good Business', Strategic Management Journal 17, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, M. R. and A. Blum: 1995, Spring, 'Companies Just Don't Fail', Business and Society Review 93, 48-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. and J. Angelidis: 1995, 'The Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members: Are There Differences Between Inside and Outside Directors?', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 405-410. Ibrahim, N. and J. Angelidis: 1991, 'Effects of Board Members' Gender on Level of Involvement in Strategic Management and Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation', Proceedings of the Northeast Decision Sciences Institute, 208-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjigian, V. and P. Bolster: 1990, 'The Elimination of Director Liability and Stakeholder Returns: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of Financial Research 13, 53-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. and L. Goldberg: 1982, 'Governing the Large Corporation: More Arguments for Public Directors', Academy of Management Review 7, 603-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., Jr. and C. P. Zeithaml: 1992, 'Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process', Academy of Management Journal 35, 766-794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, L. and A. Whatley: 1987, 'Assessing the Effects of Culture on Managerial Attitudes: A Threeculture Test', Journal of International Business Studies, 17-31.

  • Kesner, I. F. and R. Johnson: 1990, 'An Investigation of the Relationship Between Board Composition and Stockholder Suits', Strategic Management Journal 11, 327-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I. F.: 1988, 'Directors' Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender', Academy of Management Journal 31, 66-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I. F., B. Victor and B. LaMont: 1986, 'Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies', Academy of Management Journal 29, 789-799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. R. and R. B. McKenzie: 1995, 'How the Marketplace Fosters Business Honesty', Business and Society Review 92 (Winter), 5-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, V. R., Jr.: 1987, 'A CEO Looks at Ethics', Business Horizons (March-April), 2-6.

  • McGuire, J., A. Sundgreen and T. Schneeweis: 1988, 'Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 31, 854-872.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T.: 1986, 'Models of Relationship of the Firm to Society', Journal of Business Ethics, 181-191.

  • Murphy, E.: 2002, 'Best Corporate Citizens Have Better Financial Performance', Strategic Finance 83, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R.: 1984, 'Reforming Corporate Governance', California Management Review 26, 126-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Corporate Directors: 1982, Proxy Disclosures and Stockholders' Attitudes Survey (National Association of Corporate Directors, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, H., C. Saunders and A. McCarthy: 1989, 'Board Members' Background Characteristics and Their Level of Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Multivariate Investigation', Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 32-36.

  • Orlitzky, M.: 2001, 'Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance?', Journal of Business Ethics 33, 167-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. and S. Zahra: 1991, 'The Relative Power of CEOs and Boards of Directors: Association with Corporate Performance', Strategic Management Journal 12, 135-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechner, P.: 1989, 'Corporate Governance: Fact or Fiction?', Business Horizons (July-August), 11-15.

  • Rechner, P. and D. Dalton: 1991, 'Board Composition and Shareholders' Wealth: An Empirical Assessment', Strategic Management Journal 12.

  • Salmon, W. J.: 1993, 'Crisis Prevention: How to Gear Up Your Board', Harvard Business Review 71, 68-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, S.: 1990, 'The Changing Relationship Between Managers and Lawyers', Business Horizons (September-October), 21-27.

  • Securities and Exchange Commission: 1980, Staff Report on Corporate Accountability (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S.: 1987, 'The Gambler Who Refused $2 Billion', Fortune (May), 50.

  • Simpson, W. and T. Kohers: 2002, 'The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry', Journal of Business Ethics, 97-109.

  • Smith, W. and R. Blackburn: 1988, 'Corporate Social Responsibility: A Psychometric Examination of a Management Instrument', Proceedings of the Southern Management Association, 293-295.

  • Sonnenfeld, J: 1981, 'Executive Apologies for Price Fixing: Role Biased Perceptions of Causality', Academy of Management Journal, 192-198.

  • Steiner, G. and J. Miner: 1986, Management Policy and Strategy (Macmillan Publishing Company, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. And L. Fidell: 1989, Using Mutivariate Statistics (HarperCollins Publishers, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Center for Business Ethics: 1986, 'Are Corporations Institutionalizing Ethics?', Journal of Business Ethics (April), 85-91.

  • The Economist: 1993, November, 15.

  • The Working Group on Corporate Governance: 1991, 'A New Compact for Owners and Directors', Harvard Business Review 69, 141-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungson, G., C. James and B. Spicer: 1984, 'The Effects of Regulatory Agencies on Organizations in Wood Products and High Technology/ Electronics Industries', Academy of Management Journal 28, 426-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M.: 1994, 'Updating the Corporate Board', Journal of Business Strategy 15, 76-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehill, A.: 1989 May-June, 'American Executives Through Foreign Eyes', Business Horizons, 42-48.

  • Williams, H. and I. Shapiro: 1978, Power and Accountability: The Changing Role of the Corporate Board of Directors (Carnegie-Mellon University Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, J. C. and R. P. Neuschell: 1983, Emerging Issues in Corporate Governance (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. and W. Stanton: 1988, 'The Implications of Board of Directors' Composition for Corporate Strategy and Performance', International Journal of Management 5, 261-272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Augusta State University, Augusta, GA, 30904-2200, U.S.A.

    Nabil A. Ibrahim & Donald P. Howard

  2. St. John's University, Grand Central & Utopia Parkways, Jamaica, NY, 11439, U.S.A.

    John P. Angelidis

Authors
  1. Nabil A. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald P. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John P. Angelidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, N.A., Howard, D.P. & Angelidis, J.P. Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type. Journal of Business Ethics 47, 393–401 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027334524775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027334524775

Keywords

Search

Navigation