Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T13:44:39.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spirit's Embeddedness in Nature: Hegel's Decentring of Self-Legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2021

Heikki Ikäheimo*
Affiliation:
UNSW Sydney, Australiah.ikaheimo@unsw.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

A recently widely accepted view has it that the nature-spirit distinction in Hegel is to be understood as a distinction between a space or realm that is not normative, or does not involve norms, and one that is or does. Notwithstanding the merits of this view, it has tended to create a separation between nature and spirit which is both philosophically troubling and difficult to reconcile with the picture of Hegel as the arch enemy of abstract or unreconciled dualisms. In this paper I aim to show that the defining phenomenon for this view—collective self-government by norms—is on Hegel's account both dependent on living nature that involves normativity broadly conceived all the way down and also subject to the ultimate normative or evaluative principle of Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit—concrete freedom—the essence of spirit according to him. This is to say that for Hegel the normativity of collectively administered norms is neither the most basic nor the highest form of normativity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alznauer, M. (2016), ‘Hegel's Theory of Normativity’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2: 196211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, J. (1988), Bonds of Love. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2000), Articulating Reasons. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2007), ‘The Structure of Desire and Recognition: Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 33: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (2019), A Spirit of Trust. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corti, L. (2018), ‘Hegel After Sellars—Conceptual Connections’, in Corti, L. and Munziante, A. M. (eds.), Hegel and the History of Modern Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gambarotto, A. and Illetterati, L. (2020), ‘Hegel's Philosophy of Biology? A Programmatic Overview’, Hegel Bulletin: doi:10.1017/hgl.2020.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini, C. (forthcoming), ‘Hegel's philosophy of natural and human spaces’, in Bykova, M. F. and Westphal, K. R. (eds.), The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gleeson, L. (2018), ‘An Evaluative Essentialist and Holistic Reading of Hegelian Concrete Freedom in Outline: Contra Pippin’, Hegel-Jahrbuch 11:1: 216–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, L. and Ikäheimo, H. (2020), ‘Hegelian Perfectionism and Freedom’, in Moggach, D. et al. (eds.), Perfektionismus der Autonomie. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2004), ‘On the role of intersubjectivity in Hegel's Encyclopaedic Phenomenology and Psychology’, The Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 49–50: 7395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2010), ‘Animal Consciousness in Hegel's Philosophy Of Subjective Spirit’, in Arndt, A., Cruysberghs, P. and Przylebski, A. (eds.), Geist. Hegel-Jahrbuch 2010 1: 180–85. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2014), ‘Hegel's Concept of Recognition—What is it?’, in Krijnen, C. H. (ed.), Recognition—German Idealism as an Ongoing Challenge. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2017), ‘Hegel's Psychology’, in Moyar, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khurana, T. (2017), Das Leben Der Freiheit. Form und Wirklichkeit der Autonomie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2013), ‘Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel's Account of Habit’, in Stern, D. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Merker, B. (2012), ‘Embodied Normativity: Revitalizing Hegel's Account of the Human Organism’, Critical Horizons 13: 154–75. Original: ‘Jenseits des Hirns – Zur Aktualität der Hegelschen Philosophie des subjektiven Geistes‘, in B. Merker, G. Mohr and M. Quante (eds.): Subjektivität und Anerkennung. Paderborn: Mentis, 2004.Google Scholar
Mills, N. G. (2020), ‘Hegel on the Normativity of Animal Life’, Hegel Bulletin: https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2020.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. (2020), Hegel's Concept of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padui, R. (2013), ‘Hegel's Ontological Pluralism: Rethinking the Distinction Between Nature and Geist’, The Review of Metaphysics 67: 125–48.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2016), ‘On Naturalism in Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24: 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2005), ‘Speculative Naturphilosophie and the Development of the Empirical Sciences: Hegel's Perspective’, in Gutting, G. (ed.), Continental Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel's Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rand, S. (2013), ‘What's Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality’, European Journal of Philosophy 23: 6886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. (1996), Hegel's Hermeneutics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (2011), ‘Intuition, Understanding, and the Human Form of Life’, in Ikäheimo, H. and Laitinen, A. (eds.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2012), ‘How does Recognition Emerge from Nature? The Genesis of Consciousness in Hegel's Jena Writings’, Critical Horizons 13: 176–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, I. (2013), ‘Hegel's Naturalism or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia’, in Stern, D. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar