Abstract
Habitat fragmentation produces isolated patches characterized by increased edge effects from an originally continuous habitat. The shapes of these patches often show a high degree of irregularity: their shapes deviate significantly from regular geometrical shapes such as rectangular and elliptical ones. In fractal theory, the geometry of patches created by a common landscape transformation process should be statistically similar, i.e. their fractal dimensions and their form factors should be equal. In this paper, we analyze 49 woodlot fragments (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Belgian Kempen region to study the direct relationship between a transformation process and the concomitant patch geometry. Although the fractal dimension of the woodlots is scattered (i.e. they are not statistically similar), the perimeter-area relation of the fragments is characterized by a single, ‘dimension-like’ exponent. This exponent suggests a certain shape homogeneity among the patches, which is confirmed by the absence of hierarchical levels associated with sharp increases of the fractal dimension at scale transitions. The interaction of different natural (soil factor, vegetation type) and anthropogenic (afforestation, urbanization) processes during patch development is assumed to have generated this feature. Comparison of the area and perimeter fractal dimension with an ecological index for habitat quality, the interior-to-edge ratio, shows that the fractal dimension is suitable for predicting interior habitat presence, which is more likely for patches with smooth perimeters and compact areas. The ratio of the area to the perimeter fractal dimension confirms this observation, with high values for high interior-to-edge ratios, characteristic for regularly shaped patches.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Avnir, D., O. Biham, D. Lidar and O. Malcai (1998). Is the geometry of nature fractal? Science 279: 39-40.
Baskent, E.Z. and G.A. Jordan (1995). Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25: 1830-1849.
Bogaert, J. (2001). Size dependence of interior-to-edge ratios: size predominates shape. Acta Biotheoretica 49: 121-123.
Bogaert, J., P. Van Hecke, D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode and I. Impens (1998). Quantifying habitat edge for nature reserve design. Coenoses 13: 131-136.
Bogaert, J., P. Van Hecke and I. Impens (1999a). A reference value for the interior-to-edge ratio of isolated habitats. Acta Biotheoretica 47: 67-77.
Bogaert, J., P. Van Hecke, R. Moermans and I. Impens (1999b). Twist number statistics as an additional measure of habitat perimeter irregularity. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6: 275-290.
Bogaert, J., R. Moermans and P. Van Hecke (2000a). Fractal dimension of patches based on area and perimeter: evaluation of the non-regression technique. Topics in Ecology: structure and function in plants and ecosystems, R. Ceulemans, J. Bogaert, G. Deckmyn, I. Nijs (Eds), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 51-59.
Bogaert, J., R. Rousseau, P. Van Hecke and I. Impens (2000b). Alternative area-perimeter ratios for measurement of 2D shape compactness of habitats. Applied Mathematics and Computation 111: 71-85.
Bogaert, J., P. Van Hecke, D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode and I. Impens. (2000c). Landscape fragmentation assessment using a single measure. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 875-881.
Bogaert, J., D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode, I. Impens and P. Van Hecke (2001a). The interior-to-edge breakpoint distance as a guideline for nature conservation policy. Environmental Management 27: 493-500.
Bogaert, J., D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode, P. Van Hecke and I. Impens (2001b). Geometrical considerations for evaluation of reserve design. Web Ecology 2: 65-70.
Bribiesca, E. (1997). Measuring 2-D shape compactness using the contact perimeter. Computers and Mathematics with applications 33: 1-9.
Burrough, P.A. (1981). Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature, 294:240-242
Cheng, Q. (1995). The perimeter-area fractal model and its application in geology. Mathematical Geology, 27: 69-82.
Collinge, S.K. (1996). Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 59-77.
Davidson, C. (1998). Issues in measuring landscape fragmentation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 32-37.
De Blust, G., A. Froment, E. Kuyken, L. Nef and R. Verheyen (1985). Biologische Waarderingskaart van België: algemeen verklarende tekst. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid en van het Gezin, Instituut voor Hygiëne en Epidemiologie, Coördinatiecentrum van de Biologische Waarderingskaart.
De Cola, L. (1989). Fractal analysis of a classified Landsat scene. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55: 601-610.
De Cola, L. and N.S.-N. Lam (1993). Introduction to fractals in geography. Fractals in geography, N. S.-N. Lam, L. De Cola (Eds), PTR Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 3-22.
Feder, J. (1988). Fractals, Plenum Press, New York.
Forman, R.T.T. (1981). Interaction among landscape elements: a core of landscape ecology. Proceedings of the International Congress of the Netherlands Society for Landscape Ecology, S.P. Tjallingii, A.A. de Veer (Eds), Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, 35-47.
Forman, R.T.T. (1990). Ecologically sustainable landscapes: the role of spatial configuration. Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective, I.S. Zonneveld, R.T.T. Forman (Eds), Springer-Verlag, New York, 261-278.
Forman, R.T.T. (1995). Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron (1981). Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733-740.
Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron (1986). Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Frohn, R.C. (1998). Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
Imre, A. (1992). Problems of measuring the fractal dimension by the slit-island method. Scripta Metallurgica 27: 1713-1716.
Imre, A.R. (2001). About the ranking of isolated habitats with different shapes: an interior-to-edge ratio study. Acta Biotheoretica 49: 115-120.
Kenkel, N.C. and D.J. Walker (1996). Fractals in the biological sciences. Coenoses 11: 77-100.
Krummel, J.R., R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R.V. O'Neill and P.R. Coleman (1987). Landscape patterns in disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321-324.
LaGro, J. Jr. (1991). Assessing patch shape in landscape mosaics. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57: 285-293.
Laurance, W.L. (2000). Do edge effects occur over large spatial scales? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 134-135.
Lawrence, R.L. and W.J. Ripple (1996). Determining patch perimeters in raster image processing and geographic information systems. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 1255-1259.
Li, B.-L. (2000a). Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecological Modelling 132: 33-50.
Li, B.-L. (2000b). Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology? Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 27-41.
Lovejoy, S. (1982). Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science 216: 185-187.
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, San Francisco.
Mandelbrot, B.B., D.E. Passoja and A.J. Paullay (1984). Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. Nature 308: 721-722.
McGarigal, K. and B. Marks (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351.
Meltzer, M.I. and H.M. Hastings (1992). The use of fractals to assess the ecological impact of increased cattle population: case study from the Runde Communal Land, Zimbabwe. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 635-646.
Milne, B.T. (1988). Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation 27: 67-79.
Milne, B.T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity, M.G. Turner, R.H. Gardner (Eds), Springer-Verlag, New York, 199-235.
Olsen, E.R., R.D. Ramsey and D.S. Winn (1993). A modified fractal dimension as a measure of landscape diversity. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59: 1517-1520.
O'Neill, R.V., J.R. Krummel, R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D.L. DeAngelis, B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S.W. Christensen, V.H. Dale and R.L. Graham (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153-162.
O'Neill, R.V., K.H. Riiters, J.D. Wickham and K.B. Jones (1999). Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment. Ecosystem Health 5: 225-233.
Peterson, G.W. and R.E. Turner (1994). The value of salt marsh edge vs. interior as a habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh. Estuaries 17: 235-262.
Russ, J.C. (1994). Fractal Surfaces. Plenum Press, New York.
Saunders, D.A., R.J. Hobbs and C.R. Margules (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18-32.
Serra, J. (1982). Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London.
Sugihara, G. and R.M. May (1990) Applications of fractals in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 79-86.
Turner, M.G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-197.
Urban, D.L. (1993). Landscape ecology and ecosystem management. Sustainable ecological systems: implementing an ecological approach to land management, W.W. Covington, L.F. DeBano (Eds), USDA Forest Service, GTR-RM-247, 127-136.
Van Miegroet, M. (1976). Van bomen en bossen: deel 1. E. Story Scientia PVBA, Gent, 630 p. (in Dutch).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imre, A., Bogaert, J. The Fractal Dimension as a Measure of the Quality of Habitats. Acta Biotheor 52, 41–56 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ACBI.0000015911.56850.0f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ACBI.0000015911.56850.0f