Abstract
Both mainstream and art comics often use various flourishes surrounding characters’ heads. These so-called “pictorial runes” (also called “emanata”) help convey the emotional states of the characters. In this paper, using (manipulated) panels from Western and Indian comic albums as well as neutral emoticons and basic shapes in different colors, we focus on the following two issues: (a) whether runes increase the awareness in comics readers about the emotional state of the character; and (b) whether a correspondence can be found between the types of runes (twirls, spirals, droplets, and spikes) and specific emotions. Our results show that runes help communicate emotion. Although no one-to-one correspondence was found between the tested runes and specific emotions, it was found that droplets and spikes indicate generic emotions, spirals indicate negative emotions, and twirls indicate confusion and dizziness.
References
Abbott, Michael & Charles Forceville. 2011. Visual representations of emotion in manga: Loss of control is loss of hands in Azumanga Daioh volume 4. Language and Literature 20. 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011402182.Search in Google Scholar
Adams, Francis M. & Charles E. Osgood. 1973. A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 4(2). 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217300400201.Search in Google Scholar
Ballast, David K. 2002. Interior design reference manual. Belmont, CA: Professional Pub.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2017. Semiotics: The basics, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Choungourian, Assadour. 1969. Color preferences: A cross-cultural and cross-sectional study. Perceptual and Motor Skills 28(3). 801–802. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1969.28.3.801.Search in Google Scholar
Cohn, Neil. 2007. A visual lexicon. Public Journal of Semiotics 1(1). 35–56. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8814.Search in Google Scholar
Cohn, Neil. 2013. The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Cohn, Neil. 2020. Who understands comics? Questioning the universality of visual language comprehension. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350156074Search in Google Scholar
Eerden, Bart. 2009. Anger in Asterix: The metaphorical representation of anger in comics and animated films. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 243–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.4.243Search in Google Scholar
Eisner, Will. 1985. Comics and sequential art. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48(4). 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.4.384.Search in Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Yuri. 2002. The language of graphics: A framework for the analysis of syntax and meaning in maps, charts, and diagrams. Amsterdam: ILLC/University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans J. 1941. A critical and experimental study of color preferences. American Journal of Psychology 54(3). 385–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417683.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 1999. Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading images: The Grammar of Visual design (1996). Language and Literature 8(2). 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2005. Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.002.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2011a. Pictorial runes in Tintin and the Picaros. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 875–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.014.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2011b. Structural pictorial and multimodal metaphor. Lecture 7/8 of the online Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. http://semioticon.com/sio/courses/pictorial-multimodal-metaphor/ (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, Elisabeth El Refaie & Gert Meesters. 2014. Stylistics and comics. In Michael Burke (ed.), Routledge handbook of stylistics, 485–499. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315795331.ch30Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles & Jens E. Kjeldsen. 2018. The affordances and constraints of situation and genre: Visual and multimodal rhetoric in unusual traffic signs. International Review of Pragmatics 10(2). 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01002002.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, Tony Veale & Kurt Feyaerts. 2010. Balloonics: The visuals of balloons in comics. In Joyce Goggin & Dan Hassler-Forest (eds.), The rise and reason of comics and graphic literature: Critical essays on the form, 56–73. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar
Fresnault-Deruelle, Pierre. 1972. Dessins et bulles: La bande dessinée comme moyen d’expression. Paris: Bordas.Search in Google Scholar
Fresnault-Deruelle, Pierre. 1977. La visualization des phénomènes sonores. In Récits et Discours par la bande: Essais sur les comics, 169–201. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar
Gasca, Luis & Roman Gubern. 2001 [1994]. El discurso del comic. Madrid: Catedra.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, John. 1982. Metaphor in pictures. Perception 11. 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1068/p110589.Search in Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lang, Peter J. 1995. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist 50(5). 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.50.5.372.Search in Google Scholar
Leborg, Christian. 2006. Visual grammar: A design handbook. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar
McCloud, Scott. 1993. Understanding comics. New York: Paradox.Search in Google Scholar
Naz, Kaya & Helena H. Epps. 2004. Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College Student Journal 38(3). 396–405.Search in Google Scholar
Ojha, Amitash, Charles Forceville & Bipin Indurkhya. 2012. An experimental study on the role of runes in conveying emotions in comics. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar
Plutchik, Robert. 1980. A general psycho evolutionary theory of emotion. Theories of Emotion 1. 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7.Search in Google Scholar
Saito, Miho. 1996. Comparative studies on color preference in Japan and other Asian regions, with special emphasis on the preference for white. Color Research & Application 21(1). 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6378(199602)21:1<35::aid-col4>3.0.co;2-6.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199602)21:1<35::AID-COL4>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar
Saraceni, Mario. 2003. The language of comics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Shinohara, Kazuo & Yoshihiro Matsunaka. 2009. Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 265–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.4.265Search in Google Scholar
Stamenković, Dušan, Miloš Tasić & Charles Forceville. 2018. Facial expressions in comics: An empirical consideration of McCloud’s proposal. Journal of Visual Communication 17(4). 407–432.10.1177/1470357218784075Search in Google Scholar
Szawerna, Michał. 2017. Metaphoricity of conventionalized diegetic images in comics: A study in multimodal cognitive linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/b11165Search in Google Scholar
Tan, Ed S. 2001. The telling face in comic strip and graphic novel. In Baetens Jan (ed.), The graphic novel, 31–46. Leuven: University Press Leuven.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Morton. 2000 [1980]. The lexicon of comicana. Lincoln, NE: Authors Guild.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
