Abstract
Abductive reasoning is central to reconstructing the past in the geosciences. This paper outlines the nature of the abductive method and restates it in Bayesian terms. Evidence plays a key role in this working method and, in particular, traces of the past are important in this explanatory framework. Traces, whether singularly or as groups, are interpreted within the context of the event for which they have evidential claims. Traces are not considered as independent entities but rather as inter-related pieces of information concerning the likelihood of specific events. Exemplification of the use of such traces is provided by dissecting an example of their use in the environmental reconstruction of mountain climate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., & Michel, H. V. (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science, 208, 1095–1108.
Baker, V. R. (1999). Geosemiosis. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 111, 633–645.
Chamberlin, T. C. (1890). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, XV, 92–96.
Cleland, C. E. (2001). Historical science, experimental science and the scientific method. Geology, 29, 987–990.
Frodeman, R. L. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretative and historical science. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 107, 960–968.
Goodman, N. (1958). The test of simplicity. Science, 128, 1064–1068.
Goodman, N. (1967). Uniformity and simplicity. (In Uniformity and simplicity, Special Paper, Geological Society of America, 89, (pp93–99)).
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Haines-Young, R. H., & Petch, J. (1986). Physical geography: Its nature and methods. London: Harper and Row.
Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
Howie, D. (2002). Bayesian controversy in context, 1919–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inkpen, R. J. (2005). Science, philosophy and physical geography. London: Routledge.
Johnston, D. (1933). Role of analysis in scientific investigations. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 44, 461–493.
Lane, S. N. (2001). Constructive comments on D. Massey ‘Space–time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 243–256.
Lane, S. N., & Richards, K. S. (1997). Linking river channel form and process: Time, space and causality revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22, 249–260.
Leighton, J. A. (1904). The logic of history. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1, 42–45.
Mazzucchi, D., Spooner, I. S., Gilbert, R., & Osborn, G. (2003). Reconstruction of Holocene climate change using multiproxy analysis of sediments from Pyramid Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research, 35, 520–529.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhoads, B. L. (2006). The dynamic basis of geomorphology reenvisioned. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 14–30.
Rhoads, B. L., & Thorn, C. E. (1993). Geomorphology as a science: The role of theory. Geomorphology, 6, 287–307.
Rhoads, B. L., & Thorn, C. E. (1994). Contemporary philosophical perspectives on physical geography with emphasis on geomorphology. Geographical Review, 84, 90–101.
Rhoads, B. L. & Thorn, C. E. (Eds.) (1996). The scientific nature of geomorphology. Chichester: Wiley.
Richards, K. S. (1990). ‘Real’ geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15, 195–197.
Rickert, H. (1986). The limits of concept formation in natural science: A logical introduction to the historical sciences. (Translated by Oakes, G.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Simpson, G. G. (1963). Historical science. In C. C. Albritton Jr. (Ed.), The fabric of geology (pp. 24–48). Stanford: Freeman and Cooper.
Tucker, A. (1998). Uniqueness: The underdetermination of explanation. Erkenntnis, 48, 59–80.
Tucker, A. (2004a). Our knowledge of the past: A philosophy of histrography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tucker, A. (2004b). Holistic explanation of events. Philosophy, 79, 573–589.
von Engelhardt, W., & Zimmerman, J. (1988). Theory of earth science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inkpen, R.J. Explaining the Past in the Geosciences. Philosophia 36, 495–507 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9124-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9124-x