Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forecast for the Next Eon: Applied Cosmology and the Long-Term Fate of Intelligent Beings

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cosmology seems extremely remote from everyday human practice and experience. It is usually taken for granted that cosmological data cannot rationally influence our beliefs about the fate of humanity—and possible other intelligent species—except perhaps in the extremely distant future, when the issue of “heat death” (in an ever-expanding universe) becomes actual. Here, an attempt is made to show that it may become a practical question much sooner, if an intelligent community wishes to maximize its creative potential. We estimate, on the basis of a greatly simplified model, the rate of loss of potentially useful information due to the delay in undertaking the colonization of the largest gravitationally bound structures in an accelerating universe. In addition, we argue for a natural cosmological extension of the classical taxonomy of advanced technological communities given by Kardashev. New developments in the fields of anthropic self-selection and physical eschatology give, for the first time, solid foundations to such results. This may open some new (and possibly urgent) issues in the areas of future policy making and transhumanist studies generally. It may also give us a slightly better perspective on the SETI endeavor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. Lovelock, The Ages of Gaia (Norton, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Leger, J. M. Mariotti, B. Mennesson, M. Ollivier, J. L. Puget, D. Rouan, and J. Schneider, “The DARWIN project,” Astrophys. Space Sci. 241, 135.

  3. M. J. Rees, “The collapse of the universe: An eschatological study,” Observatory 89, 193(1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. J. Dyson, “Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 447(1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. J. Tipler, “Cosmological limits on computation,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 617(1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. C. Adams and G. Laughlin, “A dying universe: The long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 337(1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford University Press, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. N. Islam, The Ultimate Fate of the Universe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. C. W. Davies, The Last Three Minutes (Basic Books, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. C. Adams and G. Laughlin, The Five Ages of the Universe (The Free Press, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. M. 'Cirkovi'c, “Resource letter PEs-1: Physical eschatology,” Am. J. Phys. 71, 122(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Perlmutter et al., “Measurements of omega and lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae,” Astrophys. J. 517, 565(1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Riess et al., “The farthest known supernova: Support for an accelerating universe and a glimpse of the epoch of deceleration,” Astrophys. J. 560, 49(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. H. Lineweaver, “The cosmic microwave background and observational convergence in the Ωm−Ωλ plane,” Astrophys. J. 505, L69(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Knox, N. Christensen, and C. Skordis, “The age of the universe and the cosmological constant determined from cosmic microwave background anisotropy measurements,” Astrophys. J. 563, L95(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Rindler, “Visual horizons in world-models,” Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 116, 662(1956).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. M. Krauss and G. D. Starkman, “Life, the universe, and nothing: Life and death in an ever-expanding universe,” Astrophys. J. 531, 22(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. M. 'Cirkovi'c and N. Bostrom, “Cosmological constant and the final anthropic hypothesis,” Astrophys. Space Sci. 274, 675(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. S. Eddington, “The end of the world: From the standpoint of mathematical physics,” Nature 127, 447(1931).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. A. Wheeler, “World as system self-synthesized by quantum networking,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 4(1988).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. von Neumann, Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. J. Tipler, The Physics of Immortality (Doubleday, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. D. Brin, “The great silence—The controversy concerning extraterrestrial intelligent life,” Q. J. R. Astr. Soc. 24, 283(1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Hanson, “Burning the cosmic commons: Evolutionary strategies for interstellar colonization,” preprint available at http://hanson.gmu.edu/filluniv.pdf (1998); R. Hanson“The great filter—Are we almost past it?” preprint available at http://hanson.gmu.edu/greatfilter. htmll (1998).

  26. J. Leslie, The End of the World: The Ethics and Science of Human Extinction (Routledge, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Bostrom, “The doomsday argument, Adam & Eve, UN++ and quantum Joe,” Synthese 127, 359(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Bostrom, Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects (Routledge, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. D. Olum, “The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers,” Phil. Quart. 52, 164(2002).N. Bostrom and M. M. 'Cirkovi'c, “The doomsday argument and the self-indication assumption: Reply to Olum,” Phil. Quart. 53, 83(2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. A. Milne, “Cosmological theories,” Astrophys. J. 91, 129(1940).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. H. Lineweaver, “An estimate of the age distribution of terrestrial planets in the universe: Quantifying metallicity as a selection effect,” Icarus 151, 307(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. S. Kardashev, “Transmission of information by extraterrestrial civilizations,” Sov. Astron. 8, 217(1964).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Sandberg, “The physics of information processing superobjects: Daily life among the Jupiter brains,” J. Evol. Tech. 5(2000), http://www.jetpress.org/index.html.

  34. M. M. 'Cirkovi'c, “Cosmological forecast and its practical significance,” J. Evol. Tech. 12(2002), http://www.jetpress.org/index.html.

  35. G. J. Chaitin, “Algorithmic information theory,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 21, 350(1977).

    Google Scholar 

  36. C. G. Langton, “Studying artificial life with cellular automata,” Physica D 22, 120(1986).

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. M. Krauss and M. S. Turner, “Geometry and destiny,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 31, 1453(1999).

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738(1977).

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Zehavi and A. Dekel, “Evidence for a positive cosmological constant from flows of galaxies and distant supernovae,” Nature 401, 252(1999).

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. J. Tipler, “Anthropic-principle arguments against steady-state cosmological theories,” Observatory 102, 36(1982).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. M. 'Cirkovi'c, “The anthropic argument against infinite past and the Eddington–Lemaitre universe,” Serb. Astron. J. 161, 33(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. E. M. Jones, “'Where is everybody?'An account of Fermi's question,” Los Alamos preprint at http://lib-www.lanl.gov/la-pubs/00318938.pdf (1985).

  43. H. Kragh, Cosmology and Controversy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  44. F. J. Tipler, “How far out must we go to get into the Hubble flow?” Astrophys. J. 511, 546(1999).

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Tarter, “The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI),” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39, 511(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. H. Oort, “Superclusters,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 21, 373(1983).

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. Brillouin, Science and Information Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  48. N. Bostrom, “Existential risks,” J. Evol. Tech. 9 (2001), online journal at http://www. jetpress.org/index.html.

  49. F. J. Dyson, “Search for artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation,” Science 131, 1667(1960).

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. J. Bradbury, “Matrioshka brains,” preprint at http://www.aeiveos.com/bradbury/ MatrioshkaBrains/MatrioshkaBrains.html (2001).

  51. M. Dugi'c, M. M. 'Cirkovi'c, and D. Rakovi'c, “On a possible physical metatheory of consciousness,” Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 9, 153(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. S. M. Carroll, W. H. Press, and E. L. Turner, “The cosmological constant,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30, 499(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Sandage, “Observational tests of world models,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 26, 561(1988).

    Google Scholar 

  54. M. T. Busha, F. C. Adams, R. H. Wechsler, and A. E. Evrard, “Future evolution of cosmic structure in an accelerating universe,” Astrophys. J. 596, 713(2003).

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. L. Bennett et al., “First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Preliminary maps and basic results,” Astrophys. J. Supp. 148, 1(2003).

    Google Scholar 

  56. N. Bostrom, “Astronomical waste: The opportunity cost of delayed technological development,” Utilitas, forthcoming (preprint at http://www.nickbostrom.com/astronomical/ waste.html).

  57. J. D. Barrow, Impossibility: The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  58. A. D. Linde, “Life after inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 211, 29(1988);A. D. Linde Inflation and Quantum Cosmology (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  59. F. J. Tipler, “The ultimate fate of life in universes which undergo inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 286, 36(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Garriga, V. F. Mukhanov, K. D. Olum, and A. Vilenkin, “Eternal inflation, black holes, and the future of civilizations,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 1887(2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Astronomical Observatory Belgrade, Volgina 7, 11160, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro

    Milan M. Ćirković

Authors
  1. Milan M. Ćirković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ćirković, M.M. Forecast for the Next Eon: Applied Cosmology and the Long-Term Fate of Intelligent Beings. Foundations of Physics 34, 239–261 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019583.67831.60

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019583.67831.60

Search

Navigation