Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Business! Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business…The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business! –Ghost of Marley, Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol

Abstract

Arguing that psychology and business ethics are best brought together through a multi-level, broad-based agenda, this essay articulates a vision of psychology and business ethics to frame a future research agenda. The essay draws upon work published in JBE, but also identifies gaps where published research is needed, to build upon psychological conceptions of business ethics. Psychological concepts, notably, are not restricted to phenomena “in the head”, but are discussed at the intra-psychic, relational, and contextual levels of analysis. On the basis of this presentation, I discuss future directions for development in psychology and business ethics, including but not limited to studies of personality, emotion, decision making, motivation, and the biological bases of psychology and business ethics. An inclusive approach to these and related areas, it is argued, will both bring about depth of understanding on the psychological bases of business ethics, and allow dialogue across disciplinary areas within JBE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alker, H. R. (1969). A typology of fallacies. In M. Dogan & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S., & Vaara, E. (2014). Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordum, A. (2005). Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the categorical imperative. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 31(7), 851–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1991). Social selves: Theories of the social formation of personality. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cojuharenco, I., & Sguera, F. (2015). When empathic concern and perspective taking matter for ethical judgment: The role of time hurriedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 717–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P. (2012). Sensemaking under pressure: The influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense. Organization Science, 23(1), 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K. (2012). The employee as “dish of the day”: The ethics of the consuming/consumed self in Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D. (2018). Measuring individuals’ virtues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 793–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCremer, D., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2012). On understanding the need for a behavioral business ethics approach. In D. DeCremer & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field (pp. 3–16). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Lehner, O. (2017). Registering ideology in the creation of social entrepreneurs: Intermediary organizations, ‘ideal subject’ and the promise of enjoyment. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 753–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egorov, M., Verdorfer, A. P., & Peus, C. (2018). Taming the emotional dog: Moral intuition and ethically-oriented leader development. Journal of Business Ethics (onlinefirst).

  • Ellertson, C. F., Ingerson, M. C., & Williams, R. N. (2016). Behavioral ethics: A critique and a proposal. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falter, J. W. (1978). Some theoretical and methodological problems of multilevel analysis reconsidered. Social Science Information, 17(6), 841–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (2008). The emotional organization: Passions and power. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1989). Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession, 89, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. R. (1985). Psychology, ideology, utopia, and the commons. American Psychologist, 40(1), 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (2000). Notes for a third millennial manifesto: Renewal and redefinition in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, B. L., Bennett, R. J., & Aquino, K. (2011). Status differentiation and the protean self: A social-cognitive model of unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrety, K. H. (2008). Organisational control and the self: Critiques and normative expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgallis, P. (2017). The link between social movements and corporate social initiatives: Toward a multi-level theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 735–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., & Paxton, J. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. PNAS, 106(30), 12506–12511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2017). Focusing on ethics and broadening our intellectual base. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2018). Deepening ethical analysis in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, M., & Raufflet, E. (2017). Ideologies in markets, organizations, and business ethics: Drafting a map: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 629–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. (2008). Embodied generosity and an ethics of organization. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1357–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2011). Emotional life on the market frontier. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G. (2012). Recognition, reification and practices of forgetting: Ethical implications of human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G. (2013). Recognizing employees: Reification, dignity and promoting care in management. Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G. (2015). Extending organizational cognition: A conceptual exploration of mental extension in organizations. Human Relations, 68(3), 463–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2009). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (Second edition, pp. 110–125). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A. (2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, S., & Rai, R. (2017). Organizational wrongs, moral anger and the temporality of crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(4), 709–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, L. (2017). Feigned versus felt: Feigning behaviors and the dynamics of institutional logics. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 306–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (2005). Songs of experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. F., & Buckley, R. M. (2015). Multi-level organizational moral disengagement: Directions for future investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(3), 339–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leader behavior and Big Five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, E. Y., & Parker, M. (2013). Citation patterns in organization and management journals: Margins and centres. Organization, 20(2), 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbaum, D., & Raftopoulu, E. (2017). What would John Stuart Mill say A utilitarian perspective on contemporary neuroscience debates in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2247-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loacker, B., & Muhr, S. L. (2009). How can I become a responsible subject? Towards a practice-based ethics of responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K., Kang, D., & Li, Z. (2013). Workplace dignity in a total institution: Examining the experiences of Foxconn’s migrant workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world. Advancing humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 537–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malabou, C. (2008). What should we do with our brain? New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Seppala, E., Heineberg, Y., Rossomando, T., Doty, J., Zimbardo, P., & Zhou, Y. Y. (2015). Multiple facets of compassion: The impact of social dominance orientation and economic systems justification. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., & Bubna-Litic, D. (2012). Applied social psychology: A critical theoretical perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(12), 853–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2012). Ideology and social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, D. J., & Cromby, J. (1999). Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahoney, J. (2007). Constructing habitus: The negotiation of moral encounters at Telekom. Work Employment Society, 21(3), 479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E. (2012). Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2002). Critical discursive psychology. Discourse, 288.

  • Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2015). Psychology after discourse analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I., & Shotter, J. (eds, 1990). Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, D., & Knobe, J. (2009). The pervasive impact of moral judgment. Mind and Language, 24(5), 586–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2015). Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization, 22(2), 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C., & Harvey, G. (2012). Agonism and the possibilities of ethics for HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C., Voegtlin, V., & Maak, T. (2017). Business ethics: The promise of neuroscience. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3312-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. New York: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Abi-Rached, J. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., & Priesemuth, M. (2012). Behavioral business ethics: Taking context seriously. In D. DeCremer & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field (pp. 47–79). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi, D., & Bui, H. T. M. (2018). Group effects on individual attitudes toward social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 725–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 513–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola, S. (2015). Understanding moral courage through a feminist and developmental ethic of care. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 424–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, B. (2014). The anatomy of corporate fraud: A comparative analysis of high profile American and European corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (2016). Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77, 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2004). Commons and borderlands: Working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge. UK: Sean Kingston Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 311–378). NJ: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2015). Critical psychology. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K., & Jones, J. (2017). Precarious professionals: (in)secure identities and moral agency in neocolonial context. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 747–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., Mills, A., & Mills, J. (2005). Identity politics at work: Resisting gender, gendering resistance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. a., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gils, S., Hogg, M. A., Van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, N. (2017). When organizational identification elicits moral decision-making: A matter of the right climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(1), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voronov, M., & Vince, R. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. W., Freeman, R. E., & Parmar, B. (2008). Connected moral agency in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. G. (1998). Corporations as intentional systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, T. (2012). Human resource management in a compartmentalized world: Whither moral agency? Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. M. (2015). Comparative analysis of Jones’ and Kelley’s ethical decision-making models. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grenoble Ecole de Management, Univ Grenoble Alpes Com UE/IREGE, Grenoble, France

    Gazi Islam

Authors
  1. Gazi Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gazi Islam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author hereby certifies that there are no potential conflicts of interest involved with this study, no research is conducted using participants and/or animals and no issues regarding informed consent are relevant to the current study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, G. Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda. J Bus Ethics 165, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04107-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04107-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation