Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T11:42:43.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary and future directions of analytic philosophy: Commentary on Jaakko Hintikka, “Philosophical Research: Problems and Prospects”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Dale Jacquette
Dale Jacquette*
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
*
Dale Jacquette, Universität Bern, Länggassstrasse 49a, CH-3000, Bern 9, Switzerland. Email: dale.jacquette@philo.unibe.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 61 , Issue 2: Trends and Debates in Contemporary Epistemology , May 2014 , pp. 33 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borges, JL (1998) “Broadie's Report” [1970]. In: Collected Fictions, trans Hurley, A. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J, Sandu, G (2007) What is logic? In: Jacquette, D (ed) Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D (2000) Liar paradox and metaparadox. Sats: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Filosofi 1: 93–104.10.1515/SATS.2000.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D, ed (2007a) Introduction. In: Jacquette, Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D (2007b) Denying the liar. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1(2): 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D (2008) Denying the liar reaffirmed, Polish Journal of Philosophy 2(1): 143–157.10.5840/pjphil20082110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D (2010) Liar paradox and substitution into intensional contexts. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4(1): 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1965) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N Kemp . New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1975) Philosophical Remarks, ed Rhees, R and trans Hargreaves, , White, R. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar