Skip to main content
Log in

Externalism revisited: Is there such a thing as narrow content?

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bach, K. (1982), “De re Belief and Methodological Solipsism”, in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (1988), “Burge's New Thought Experiment: Back to the Drawing Room”, The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXV, 2, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. R. (1987), “Content by Courtesy”, The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXIV, 4, 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1986), “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology”, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr. & H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, X, 1986, Minneapolis: U. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1979), “Individualism and the Mental”, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr. & H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. IV, Minneapolis: U. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1982), “Other Bodies”, in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object, Essays on Intentionality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1986a), “Individualism and Psychology”, The Philosophical Review, XCV, 1, 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1986b), “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind”, The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXIII, 12, 697–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1982), “Beyond Belief”, in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object, Essays on Intentionality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K. S. (1966), “Reference and Definite Descriptions”, in S. P. Schwartz (ed.), Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, Ithaca: Cornell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K. S. (1989), “Belief Content and the External World”, paper delivered at the APA Pacific Division, in Berkeley, March 24, 1989.

  • Evans, G. (1982), The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. (1977), “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role”, The Journal of Philosophy, LXXIV, 379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1980), “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology”, in Representations, Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press.

  • Fodor, J. A. (1987), Psychosemantics, the Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press.

  • Harman, G. (1982), “Conceptual Role Semantics”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23, 2, 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P. (1987), “Thoughts and Belief-Ascriptions”, Mind and Language, 2, 4, 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1977), “Demonstratives”, mimeo, UCLA.

  • Kripke, S. (1979), “A Puzzle about Belief”, in A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B. (1987a), “Social Content and Psychological Content”, in D. Merrill and R. Grimm (eds.), Contents of Thoughts, Arizona University Press.

  • Loar, B. (1987b), “Reply to Bilgrami: A New Kind of Content”, in D. Merrill and R. Grimm (eds.), Contents of Thoughts, Arizona University Press.

  • Loewer, B. & E. Lepore (1986), “Solipsistic Semantics”, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr. & H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. X, Minneapolis: U. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1977), “On the Sense and Reference of a Proper Name”, in M. Platts (ed.), Reference, Truth and Reality, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1982), “The Structure of Content”, in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object, Essays on Intentionality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1983), The Subjective View, Secondary Qualities and Indexical Thoughts, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1977), “Frege on Demonstratives”, The Philosophical Review, 86, 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1979), “The Essential Indexical”, Noûs, 13, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1974), “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”, in H. Putnam, Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (1989), “Direct Reference, Meaning, and Thought”, forthcoming in Noûs.

  • Salmon, N. (1986), Frege's Puzzle, MIT Press.

  • Sperber, D. & D. Wilson (1986), Relevance, Communication and Cognition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1978a), “Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis”, The Monist, 61, 4, 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1978b), “Beliefs and Subdoxastic States”, Philosophy of Science, 45, 4, 499–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, the Case against Belief, MIT Press.

  • Stich, S. (1988), “Narrow Content Meets Fat Syntax”, mimeo.

  • Wettstein, H. K. (1986), “Does Semantics Rest on a Mistake?”, The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXIII, 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, P. Externalism revisited: Is there such a thing as narrow content?. Philosophical Studies 60, 143–176 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367468

Keywords

Navigation