Skip to main content
Log in

Raising as function composition

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abe, Yasuaki: 1985,A Theory of Categorial Morphology and Agglutination in Japanese, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Ades, Anthony and Mark Steedman: 1982, ‘On the Order of Words’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 517–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian: 1984, ‘Sentence Types and the Form-Function Fit’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, F. and T. Hoekstra: 1984, ‘Extractions from With-Constructions’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 689–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Avery: 1982, ‘The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic’, in Joan Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 427–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1979, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon 1980: ‘In Defense of Passive’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 297–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, Renate: 1973, ‘The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numerals’, in J. Kimball (ed.),Syntax and Semantics, vol. 2, Seminar Press, pp.51–93.

  • Bayer, Samuel: 1987, ‘Adjunct Extraction in English: The Case of Bare NP Adverbs’, presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, San Francisco.

  • Borkin, Ann: 1973, ‘To Be and Not To Be’, in C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark, and A. Weiser (eds.),Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, The Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi: 1986,Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Genuaro: 1984a, ‘Some Anaphoric Properties of Infinitives’,Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, pp. 28–39.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984b,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro and Pauline Jacobson: 1985, ‘Local and Long Distance Control’,Proceedings of NELS 16, McGill University, pp. 57-74. (Distributed by the Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts.)

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1957,Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1970, “Remarks on Nominalization’, in Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Company, Waltham, pp. 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures in Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra and James McCloskey: 1987, ‘Government, Barriers, and Small Clauses in Modern Irish’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria and Edwin Williams: 1987, On the Definition of a Word, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1978, “Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 393–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1982a, ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’, in Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1982b, ‘More on the Categorial Theory of Grammatical Relations’, in Annie Zaenen (ed.), Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on Grammatical Relations, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 115–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1985. ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control’, Linguistics and Philosophy8, 291–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1987, ‘Thematic Proto-Roles, Subject Selection, and Lexical Semantic Defaults’, Colloquium Lecture presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, San Francisco.

  • Dowty, David: 1988, ‘Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-constituent Conjunction’, in Richard Oehrle, Emmon Bach and Dierdre Wheeler (eds.),Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 153–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David and Pauline Jacobson: 1989, ‘Agreement as a Semantic Phenomenon’, in J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds.),Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (1988), Ohio State University, 95–108.

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1976, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Michael: 1981,Structure Building Operations and Word Order, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Gazdar, Gerald and Ivan Sag: 1981, ‘Passive and Reflexives in Phrase Structure Grammar’, in J. Groendendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag: 1985,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1976,Wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1982, ‘Grammatical Relations and Subcategorization’, in Annie Zaenen (ed.),Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on Grammatical Relations, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge and Ivan Sag: 1976, ‘Deep and Surface Anaphora’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’ in A. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Model Theoretic Semantics (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics v. 1), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1985,Categorial Morphology, Garland Publishing, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, Rodney: 1971, The Sentence in Written English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1982, ‘Comments on ‘Subcategorization and Grammatical Relations’ by Jane Grimshaw’, in Annie Zaenen (ed.),Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Haruard Conference on Grammatical Relations, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1983, ‘Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations’, Colloquium Lecture presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Minneapolis.

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1984, ‘Connectivity in Phrase Structure Grammar’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 535–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1986, ‘A Categorial Grammar Analysis of Raising’, presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, New York.

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1987, ‘Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations, and Discontinuous Constituents’, in Geoffrey Huck and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency, Academic Press, New York, pp. 27–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1989, ‘A(nother) Categorial Analysis of Extraction’, presented at the Conference on Categorial Grammar, LSA Summer Institute, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Brian: 1979, ‘Raising to Oblique in Modern Greek’, inProceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 114–128.

  • Joseph, Brian: to appear, ‘Is Raising to Prepositional Object a Natural Language Grammatical Construction?’,, in Brian Joseph and Paul Postal (eds.),Studies in Relational Grammar 3.

  • Kang, Beom-mo: 1988,Functional Inheritance, Anaphora, and Semantic Interpretation in a Generalized Categorial Grammar, Ph.D. Dissertation, Brown University.

  • Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag: 1985, ‘Type-Driven Translation’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 163–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, Joachim: 1958, ‘The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’,American Mathematical Monthly 65, 154–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James: 1971, ‘Tense and Time Reference in English’, in C. Fillmore and D.T. Langendoen (eds.),Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James: 1984, ‘Raising, Subcategorization and Selection in Modern Irish’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 441–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James: 1989, ‘Comments on Jacobson, “Raising as Function Composition”, presented at the Workshop on Control, MIT.

  • Moortgat, Michael: 1985, ‘Functional Composition and Complement Inheritance’, in Hoppenbrouwers, Seuren, and Weijters (eds.),Meaning and the Lexicon, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David and Paul Postal: 1974, Lectures on Relational Grammar, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David and Paul Postal: 1983, ‘The Relational Succession Law’, in David Perlmutter (ed.),Studies in Relational Grammar 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 36–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl: 1984,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars and Natural Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Postal, Paul: 1974,On Raising, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1980, “Comments on Chomsky, “On the Representation of Form and Function”, in J. Mehler (eds.),Proceedings of the June 1980 CNRS Conference on the Cognitive Sciences, Paris.

  • Rosenbaum, Peter: 1967, The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John: 1969, ‘Auxiliaries as Main Verbs’, in W. Todd (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Serie One, Great Expectations Press, Evanston, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan: 1982, ‘A Semantic Theory of NP-Movement Dependencies’, in Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 427–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groendendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, pp. 483–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, Susan: 1978, ‘Synonymy Judgments as Syntactic Evidence’, in Peter Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: 1985, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’,Language 61, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: 1988, ‘Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 403–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Timothy: 1983, ‘Subjects Across Categories’,The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1988, ‘Bound Variables in Syntax’, in R. Bartsch et al. (eds.),Proceedings o f the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium, Foris, Dordrecht,

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, Richmond: 1976, ‘Some Extensions of Montague Grammar’, in Barbara Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 77–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1987, ‘Implicit Arguments, the Binding Theory, and Control’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff: 1987, ‘Case in Tiers’,Language 63, 217–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobson, P. Raising as function composition. Linguist Philos 13, 423–475 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630750

Keywords

Navigation