Trusting the Subject?: The Use of Introspective Evidence in Cognitive Science, Volume 1Anthony Jack, Andreas Roepstorff Introspective evidence is still treated with great suspicion in cognitive science. This work is designed to encourage cognitive scientists to take more account of the subject's unique perspective. |
Contents
K Anders Ericsson | 1 |
Dennett | 19 |
Dan Zahavi and Josef Parnas | 53 |
Patrick Haggard and Helen Johnson | 72 |
Shaun Gallagher | 85 |
Bernard J Baars | 100 |
David Leopold Alexander Maier and Nikos K Logothetis | 115 |
Wilson | 131 |
Richard E Cytowic | 157 |
Common terms and phrases
analysis approach argued autists awareness Baars Baron-Cohen behaviour beliefs binocular disparity binocular rivalry Cambridge cognitive neuroscience cognitive processes cognitive science concepts conscious experience Consciousness Studies correlates cortex Dennett Depraz dynamics emotion empirical ence Ericsson and Simon example experimental first-person data first-person methods framework Frith Gallagher Gopnik heterophenomenology human intentional interpretation intersubjectivity intro introspective evidence introspective methods introspective reports investigators involved issue Jack Journal of Consciousness ketamine Logothetis Marcel measures memory mental methodology monkey motor movement N-rays Necker cube neural neurons neurophenomenology neuroscience nonconscious objective observation one's pattern perception performance perspective phenomenology phenomenology of action philosophers problem psychology psychophysical question responses Roepstorff schizophrenia scientific scientists self-awareness sense sensory specific spective reports stimulus strategy subjective experience synaesthesia task theoretical theory of mind theory-theorists thinking third-person thoughts tion tive Trends in Cognitive trials trust unconscious understanding University Press validity Varela verbal reports visual visual perception Zahavi