Skip to main content
Log in

The humanities and gross anatomy: Forgotten alternatives

  • Published:
The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers in medical education have extensively studied negative reactions to gross anatomy, sometimes grouped under the term “the cadaver experience.” Although there has been disagreement about the extent and importance of such phenomena, several attempts at curricular reform have been designed to “humanize” the student-cadaver encounter. However, some obvious sources linking gross anatomy and the humanities have been consistently overlooked. Such sources—from the history of art, the history of anatomy, and autobiographical and imaginative literature—not only bear witness to the “cadaver experience” for anatomists of the past, but also offer forgotten alternatives for placing present-day reactions in perspective. Former methods of teaching which used such material might serve as models for reintegrating the humanities into the study of gross anatomy as a possible humanizing force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  1. Knight, J. A.Medical Student: Doctor in the Making. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gregg, A.For Future Doctors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Renshaw, D. C. Death and the Doctor.Chicago Med. 82, 1979, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle, B. P., & Coombs, R. H. Personality profiles related to emotional stress in the initial year of medical training.J. Med. Educ. 46, 1971, 882–888.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, H., et al.Boys in White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hendin, D.Death as a Fact of Life. New York: Warner Paperback Library, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hafferty, F. W. “Exposure to Death and Dying in the First Year of Medical School: An Examination of Content and Consequences.” Unpublished dissertation, Yale University, 1976.

  8. Lief, H. I., & Fox, R. C. Training for “Detached Concern” in Medical Students. InThe Psychological Basis of Medical Practice H. I. Lief, et al., Eds, New York: Harper and Row, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marks, S. C., & Bertman, S. L. Experiences with learning about death and dying in the undergraduate anatomy curriculum.J. Med. Educ. 55, 1980, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blackwell, B., Rodin, A. E., Nagy, F., & Reece, R. D. Humanizing the student-cadaver encounter.Cen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1, 1979, 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keen, W. W.A Sketch of the Early History of Practical Anatomy. Philadelphia: P. Madeira, 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Cavanagh, G. S. T. A new view of the Vesalian landscape.Medical History 27, 1983, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heckscher, W. S.Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Nicolaas Tulp: An Iconological Study. New York: New York University Press, 1958. Michael Platt. Looking at the body.Hastings Center Reports, 5, 1975, 21–28. Berg, G. The visual arts in health professional education: Another way of seeing. InThe Visual Arts and Medical Education. G. Berg. (Ed.) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schupbach, W.The Paradox of Rembrandt's “Anatomy of Dr. Tulp.” London; Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For additional examples of the graphic heritage of anatomy, see Chewning, E. B.Anatomy Illustrated. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Blake, J. B. Anatomy. InThe Education of American Physicians. R. L. Numbers, ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980. Frank, J. B. Body Snatching: A Grave Medical Problem.Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 49, 1976. Edwards, L. F. Resurrection Riots during the Heroic Age of Anatomy in America.Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 25, 1951, 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aughinbaugh, W. E.I Swear By Apollo. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery, H. A body snatcher sponsors Pennsylvania's anatomy act. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 21, 1966, 374–393.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stone, J. Cadaver. InThe Smell of Matches. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Benn, G. Little Aster. InPrimal Vision: Selected Writings of Gottfried Benn. New York: New Directions, 1971. Plath, S. Two views of a cadaver room. InThe Colossus and Other Poems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1976. Wagoner, D. Their bodies.Poetry, October 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terry, J.S. The humanities and gross anatomy: Forgotten alternatives. J Med Hum 6, 90–98 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142303

Keywords

Navigation