Abstract
Researchers in medical education have extensively studied negative reactions to gross anatomy, sometimes grouped under the term “the cadaver experience.” Although there has been disagreement about the extent and importance of such phenomena, several attempts at curricular reform have been designed to “humanize” the student-cadaver encounter. However, some obvious sources linking gross anatomy and the humanities have been consistently overlooked. Such sources—from the history of art, the history of anatomy, and autobiographical and imaginative literature—not only bear witness to the “cadaver experience” for anatomists of the past, but also offer forgotten alternatives for placing present-day reactions in perspective. Former methods of teaching which used such material might serve as models for reintegrating the humanities into the study of gross anatomy as a possible humanizing force.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Knight, J. A.Medical Student: Doctor in the Making. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1973.
Gregg, A.For Future Doctors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.
Renshaw, D. C. Death and the Doctor.Chicago Med. 82, 1979, 153–160.
Boyle, B. P., & Coombs, R. H. Personality profiles related to emotional stress in the initial year of medical training.J. Med. Educ. 46, 1971, 882–888.
Becker, H., et al.Boys in White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
Hendin, D.Death as a Fact of Life. New York: Warner Paperback Library, 1974.
Hafferty, F. W. “Exposure to Death and Dying in the First Year of Medical School: An Examination of Content and Consequences.” Unpublished dissertation, Yale University, 1976.
Lief, H. I., & Fox, R. C. Training for “Detached Concern” in Medical Students. InThe Psychological Basis of Medical Practice H. I. Lief, et al., Eds, New York: Harper and Row, 1963.
Marks, S. C., & Bertman, S. L. Experiences with learning about death and dying in the undergraduate anatomy curriculum.J. Med. Educ. 55, 1980, 48–52.
Blackwell, B., Rodin, A. E., Nagy, F., & Reece, R. D. Humanizing the student-cadaver encounter.Cen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1, 1979, 315–321.
Keen, W. W.A Sketch of the Early History of Practical Anatomy. Philadelphia: P. Madeira, 1870.
See Cavanagh, G. S. T. A new view of the Vesalian landscape.Medical History 27, 1983, 77–79.
Heckscher, W. S.Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Nicolaas Tulp: An Iconological Study. New York: New York University Press, 1958. Michael Platt. Looking at the body.Hastings Center Reports, 5, 1975, 21–28. Berg, G. The visual arts in health professional education: Another way of seeing. InThe Visual Arts and Medical Education. G. Berg. (Ed.) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.
Schupbach, W.The Paradox of Rembrandt's “Anatomy of Dr. Tulp.” London; Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 1982.
For additional examples of the graphic heritage of anatomy, see Chewning, E. B.Anatomy Illustrated. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.
See Blake, J. B. Anatomy. InThe Education of American Physicians. R. L. Numbers, ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980. Frank, J. B. Body Snatching: A Grave Medical Problem.Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 49, 1976. Edwards, L. F. Resurrection Riots during the Heroic Age of Anatomy in America.Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 25, 1951, 178–184.
Aughinbaugh, W. E.I Swear By Apollo. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1938.
Montgomery, H. A body snatcher sponsors Pennsylvania's anatomy act. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 21, 1966, 374–393.
Stone, J. Cadaver. InThe Smell of Matches. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1972.
See Benn, G. Little Aster. InPrimal Vision: Selected Writings of Gottfried Benn. New York: New Directions, 1971. Plath, S. Two views of a cadaver room. InThe Colossus and Other Poems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1976. Wagoner, D. Their bodies.Poetry, October 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terry, J.S. The humanities and gross anatomy: Forgotten alternatives. J Med Hum 6, 90–98 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142303
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142303