Abstract
The aim of this paper is to outline a typologyof selection processes, and show that differentsub-categories have different explanatorypower. The basis of this typology of selectionprocesses is argued to be the difference ofreplication processes involved in them. Inorder to show this, I argue that: 1.Replication is necessary for selection and 2.Different types of replication lead todifferent types of selection. Finally, it isargued that this typology is philosophicallysignificant, since it contrasts cases ofselection (on the basis of the replicationprocesses involved in them) whereby selectioncauses adaptation – and, therefore, can beused in explanations of the (real or apparent)teleology of Nature – and cases in whichselection lacks such explanatory power.
References
Adams, P.R.: 1998, 'Hebb and Darwin', Journal of Theoretical Biology 195, 419-438.
Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L.M. and Tooby, J. (eds): 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bedau, M.: 1991, 'Can Biological Teleology Be Naturalized?', Journal of Philosophy 88, 647-657.
Brandon, R.N.: 1996, Concepts and Methods in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Buss, D.M.: 1994, The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, Basic Books, New York.
Buss, D.M.: 1995, 'Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science', Psychological Inquiry 6, 1-30.
Campbell, D.: 1974, 'Evolutionary Epistemology', in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, pp. 413-463.
Changeux, J.-P.: 1985, Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind, Pantheon, New York.
Darden, L. and Cain, A.J.: 1989, 'Selection Type Theories', Philosophy of Science 56, 106-129.
Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dawkins, R.: 1982, 'Replicators as Vehicles', reprinted in R.N. Brandon and R.M. Burian (eds), Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.
Dawkins, R.: 1983, 'Universal Darwinism', in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Man, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 403-425.
Dennett, D.C.: 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Touchstone, New York.
Edelman, G.M.: 1987, Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, Basic Books, New York.
Godfrey-Smith, P.: 2000, 'The Replicator in Retrospect', Biology and Philosophy 15, 403-423.
Griffiths, P. and Gray, R.: 1994, 'Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation', Journal of Philosophy 91, 277-304.
Hull, D.L.: 1980, 'Individuality and Selection', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311-332.
Hull, D.L.: 1981, 'Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay', in U.J. Jensen and R. Harré (eds), The Philosophy of Evolution, Harvester Press, Brighton, pp. 23-44.
Hull, D.L.: 1988, 'Science as Process', Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Hull, D.L.: 2001, Science and Selection, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hull, D.L., Langman, R.E. and Glenn, S.S.: 2001, 'A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology and Behavior', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 511-574. Reprinted in Hull, D.L.: 2001.
Lewontin, R.: 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.
Lewontin, R.: 1991, Biology as Ideology, Harper, New York.
Millikan, R.G.: 1984, Language, Thought and Other Biologocal Categories, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Millikan, R.G.: 1993, White Queen Psychology and other Tales for Alice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Millikan, R.G.: 2000, On Clear and Confused Ideas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nanay, B.: 2001, 'A More Pluralist Typology of Selection Processes', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 547-548.
Neander, K.: 1995a, 'Pruning the Tree of Life', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 59-80.
Neander, K.: 1995b, 'Explaining Complex Adaptations. A Reply to Sober's 'Reply to Neander' ',British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 583-587.
Papineau, D.: 1987, Reality and Representation, Blackwell, Oxford.
Papineau, D.: 1993, Philosophical Naturalism, Blackwell, Oxford/Cambridge, MA.
Pinker, S.: 1997, How the Mind Works, W. W. Norton, New York.
Plotkin, H.C.: 1997, Evolution in Mind, A Lane, New York.
Popper, K.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon, Oxford.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober, E.: 1995, 'Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 384-397.
Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1994, 'A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem', Philosophy of Science 61, 534-555.
Sterelny, K.: 2001, The Evolution of Agency and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sterelny, K., Smith, K. and Dickison, M.: 1996, 'The Extended Replicator', Biology and Philosophy 11, 377-403.
Vrba, E.: 1984, 'What Is Species Selection?', Systematic Zoology 33, 263-292.
Walsh, D.M.: 2000, 'Chasing Shadows: Natural Selection and Adaptation', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31, 135-153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nanay, B. The Return of the Replicator: What is Philosophically Significant in a General Account of Replication and Selection?. Biology & Philosophy 17, 109–121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012932516775
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012932516775