Abstract
This paper addresses, and seeks to correct, some frequent misunderstandings concerning the claim that science is socially constructed. It describes several features of scientific inquiry that have been usefully illuminated by constructivist studies of science, including the mundane or tacit skills involved in research, the social relationships in scientific laboratories, the causes of scientific controversy, and the interconnection of science and culture. Social construction, the paper argues, should be seen not as an alternative to but an enhancement of scientists’ own professional understanding of how science is done. The richer, more finely textured accounts of scientific practice that the constructivist approach provides are potentially of great relevance to public policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weinberg, S. (1995) “Night Thoughts of a Quantum Physicist,”Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences XLIX:51–64.
Gross, P. and N. Levitt. (1994)Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Shapin, S. (1995) “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,”Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289–321.
Winner, L. (1986)The Whale and the Reactor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gross, P. and N. Levitt. (1994), p. 43.
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar (1979)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Barnes, B. and D. Bloor (1982) “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge,” pp. 21–47 in M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds.,Rationality and Relativism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Shapin, S. (1994)A Social History of Truth, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Wynne, B. (1995) “Public Understanding of Science,” pp. 361–388 in S. Jasanoff et al., eds.The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Douglas, M. and A. Wildavsky (1982)Risk and Culture, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Jasanoff, S. (1991) “American Exceptionalism and the Political Acknowledgment of Risk,”Daedalus 119:61–81.
Keller, E.F. (1983)A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, Freeman, New York.
Duster, T. (1990)Backdoor to Eugenics, Routledge, New York.
Berger, B.M. (1994) “Taking Arms,”Science 264: 985–986, 989.
Latour, B. (1985)Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gross, P. and N. Levitt. (1994), p. 58, author’s emphasis.
Gross, P. and N. Levitt. (1994), p. 162, author’s emphasis.
Bloor, D. (1991) Review of P. Galison, How Experiments End,Social Studies of Science 21: 186–189.
Kaiser J, and E. Marshall (1996) Imanishi-Kari Ruling Slams ORI,Science 272: 1864–1865.
Weinberg, A. (1972) “Science and Trans-Science,”Minerva 10: 209–222.
Colwell, R. (1986) “Global Climate: Emerging Diseases and New Epidemics”, AAAS President’s Lecture, Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 10 February 1996.
Jasanoff, S. (1995)Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jasanoff, S. Is science socially constructed—And can it still inform public policy?. Sci Eng Ethics 2, 263–276 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583913
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583913