Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking Care of One's Own: Justice and Family Caregiving

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper asks whether adult children have aduty of justice to act as caregivers for theirfrail, elderly parents. I begin (Sections I.and II.) by locating the historical reasons whyrelationships within families were not thoughtto raise issues of justice. I argue that thesereasons are misguided. The paper next presentsspecific examples showing the relevance ofjustice to family relationships. I point outthat in the United States today, the burden ofcaregiving for dependent parents fallsdisproportionately on women (Sections III. andIV.). The paper goes on to use Rawls'theoretical tool of the veil of ignorance toargue that caring for parents should not belinked to a person's sex and more generally,that there is no duty of justice to assume therole of caregiver for dependent parents(Sections V.). Although justice does notprovide the moral foundations for parent care,I show that it nonetheless places importantlimits on the instinct to care. I concludethat the voice of justice should be audible,and is intrinsically present, withinfamilies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Family Caregiver Alliance. Fact Sheet: Selected Long-Term Care Statistics. http://www.caregiver.org/factsheets/long_term_statsC.html, accessed 4/1/2001. San Francisco: Family Caregiver Alliance, p. 2.

  2. Family Caregiver Alliance. Fact Sheet: Selected Long-Term Care Statistics. http://www.caregiver.org/factsheets/long_term_statsC.html, accessed 4/1/2001. San Francisco: Family Caregiver Alliance, p. 5.

  3. Family Caregiver Alliance. Fact Sheet: Selected Long-Term Care Statistics. http://www.caregiver.org/factsheets/long_term_statsC.html, accessed 4/1/2001. San Francisco: Family Caregiver Alliance, p. 2.

  4. Elshtain JB. Moral women and immoral man: A consideration of the public-private split and its political ramifications. Polit Soc. 1974; 4: 453–473.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elshtain JB. Public Man, Private Women. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jecker NS. Privacy beliefs and the violent family. JAMA 1993; 269(6): 776–780.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans.W.D. Ross. In McKeon R, ed. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House, 1941, p. 1021, at 1138a19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Price AW. The household. In Price AW, ed. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 162–178, see especially p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans.W.D. Ross. In McKeon R, ed. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House, 1941, p. 1013, at 1134b8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Okin SM. Conclusions. In Okin SM, ed. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979, pp. 274–304, see especially pp. 284 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hegel GWF. The Philosophy of Right, trans. T.M. Knox. New York: Oxford University Press, 1952, remark to par. 163, p. 112. See also pp. 110–122, pars 158–181.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mill JS. The subjection of women. In Wollheim R, ed. John Stuart Mill Three Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975, pp. 427–548, at p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mill JS, Taylor H. Essays on Sex Equality. Rossi A, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970, at pp. 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Okin SM. John Stuart Mill, liberal feminist. In Okin SM, ed. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979, pp. 197–230, at pp. 227 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge University Press, 1971, at p. 511.

  16. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noddings N. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984, at p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruddick S. Maternal Thinking. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1989, at p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schoeman F. Rights of children, rights of parents, and the moral basis of the family. Ethics 1980; 91: 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruddick S. Maternal Thinking. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1989, at p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruddick S. Maternal Thinking. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1989, at p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jecker NS. Impartiality and special relations. In Meyers D, Tietjens K, Kenneth M, Cornelius F, eds. Kindred Matters. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jecker NS, Berg AO. Allocating medical resources in rural America: Alternative perceptions of justice. Social Science and Medicine 1992: 34: 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Okin SM. Are our theories of justice gender neutral? In Fullinwider RK, Mills C, eds. The Moral Foundations of Civil Rights. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1986, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jecker NS. Justice and the private sphere. Pub Aff Quarterly 1994; 8(3): 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jecker NS. Privacy beliefs and the violent family. JAMA 269(6), 1993: 776–780.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brody EM. Women in the Middle. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1990, at p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson KM. Family caregiving: Who provides the care, and at what cost? Nurs Econ 1997; 15(5): 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pavalko EK, Artis JE. Women's caregiving and paid work: Causal relationships in late midlife. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997; 52(4): 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sterneck JG. Family care giving: What price Love? J Long Term Care Adm 1990; 18(2): 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller B, Cafasso L. Gender differences in caregiving: Fact or artifact? Gerontologist 1992; 32(4): 498–507.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hawkins B. Daughters and caregiving: Taking care of our own. AAOHN J 1996; 44(9): 433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Neal MB, Ingersoll-Dayton B, Starrels ME. Gender and relationship differences in caregiving patterns and consequences among employed caregivers. Gerontologist 1997; 37(6): 804–816.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tabak N, Ehrenfeld M, Alpert, R. Feelings of anger among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Int J Nurs Pract 1997; 3(2): 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schultz FS, Carnevale FA. Engagement and suffering in responsible caregiving. Theoretical Medicine 1996; 17(3): 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wuest J. Institutionalizing women's oppression. Health Care Women Int Sep-Oct 1993; 14(5): 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Phillips LR. On becoming a caregiver. Caring Apr 1995; 14(4): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McGrew KB. Daughters’ caregiving decision: From an impulse to a balancing point of care. J Women Aging 1998; 10(2): 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee GR, Coward RT. Gender differences in parent care: Demographic factors and same-gender preferences. J Gerontol 1993; 48(1): S9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jecker NS. What do husbands and wives owe each other in old age? In McCullough LB, Wilson NL, eds. Long-Term Care Decisions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jecker NS. Are filial duties unfounded? Am Philosophical Quarterly 1989; 26: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jecker NS. Societal aging. InWarren TR, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 2nd edn. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1995, pp. 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jecker NS. Caring for the disabled elderly. In Walters JW, ed. Choosing Who's To Live: Ethics and Aging. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1996, pp. 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Institute of Medicine, Toward A National Strategy for Long-Term Care of the Elderly: A Study Plan for Evaluation of New Policy Options for the Future. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hooyman NR, Gonyea JG. A feminist model of family care: Practice and policy directions. J Women Aging 1999; 11(2–3): 146–169.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Arno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM. The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Aff 1999 Mar-Apr; 18(2): 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Speer TL. Care and care alike. Hosp Health Netw 1998, Oct 5; 72(19): 36–39, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gordon S. The impact of managed care on female caregivers in the hospital and home. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1997; 52(2): 75–77, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Levine C. Home sweet hospital: The nature and limits of private responsibilities for home health care. J Aging Health 1999; 11(3): 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shklar JN. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990, at p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Noddings N. Moral obligations or moral support for high-tech home care. In Arras JD, ed. Bringing the Hospital Home: Ethical and Social Implications of High Tech Home Care (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 149–165, at 155.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Williams B. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Williams B. Persons, character and morality. In Williams B, ed. Moral Luck. NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 1–19, at pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  57. MM, Pearlin LI. Caregiving: Role engulfment and the loss of self. Gerontologist Oct 1992; 32(5): 656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Langner SR. Finding meaning in caring for elderly relatives. Holist Nurs Pract Apr 1995; 9(3): 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Guberman N, Maheu P, Maille C. Women as family caregivers: Why do they care? Gerontologist Oct 1992; 32(5): 607–617.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Noddings, Nel. Moral obligations or moral support for high-tech home care. In Arras JD, ed. Bringing the Hospital Home: Ethical and Social Implications of High Tech Home Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995: 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1999, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Daniels, N. Am I My Parents’ Keeper?: An Essay on Justice Between the Young and the Old. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jecker NS. Are filial duties unfounded? Am Philosophical Quarterly 26; 1989: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nicholson LJ. Gender and History: The Limits of Social Theory in the Age of the Family. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Arras JD, ed. Bringing the Hospital Home: Ethical and Social Implications of High-Tech Home Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

  67. Nicholson LJ. Gender and History: The Limits of Social Theory in the Age of the Family. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, p. 205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical History and Ethics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Nancy S. Jecker

Authors
  1. Nancy S. Jecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jecker, N.S. Taking Care of One's Own: Justice and Family Caregiving. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 117–133 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020323828931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020323828931

Search

Navigation