Abstract
Cognition or higher brain activity is sometimes seen as a phenomenon greater than the sum of its parts. This viewpoint however is largely dependent on the state of the art of experimental techniques that endeavor to characterize morphology and its association to function. Retinal ganglion cells are readily accessible for this work and we discuss recent advances in computational techniques in identifying novel parameters that describe structural attributes possibly associated with specific function. These parameters are based on calculating wavelet gradients from cell images followed by the extraction of meaningful measures including 2nd wavelet moment, entropy of orientation, and curvature. For the three cell types analyzed, the mean 2nd wavelet moment, which relates to the field of influence of the dendritic-tree segments was significantly different. β cells had the highest mean 2nd wavelet moment, followed by the α and δ cells (134 ± 22, 93 ± 19 and 63 ± 12, respectively). There was no significant difference between cells for entropy of orientation, indicating no class with a preferential orientation of their dendritic tree. Curvature provided similar results to the 2nd wavelet moment with β cells having the highest curvature followed by α and the δ cells (mean ± SD: 161 ± 15; 134 ± 22; 121 ± 15). Our feature space analysis also indicated a difference between these cell types. No difference was found between the α and β cell types and their physiological counterparts the Y and X cells based on wavelet analysis. Both the X and Y cells can be divided into two subtypes, the ON- and OFF-center cells based on the stratification level of the dendritic tree within the retina. Using 2nd wavelet moment, a difference in their morphological attributes, not reported previously, was noted for these subtypes. The 2nd wavelet moment and curvature are further discussed with respect to explaining regularity of spacing and coverage associated with retinal ganglion cell mosaics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberch, P., 1980: Ontogenesis and morphological diversification, Am. Zool. 20, 653-667.
Antoine, J.-P., Carrette, P., Murenzi, R. and Piette, B., 1993: Image analysis with two-dimensional continuous wavelet transform, Signal Process. 31, 241-272.
Ascoli, G. A., 1999: Progress and perspective in computational neuroanatomy, Anat. Rec. 257, 195-207.
Arnéodo, A., Decoster, N. and Roux, S. G., 2000: A wavelet-based method for multifractal image analysis. I. Methodology and test applications on isotropic and anisotropic random rough surfaces, Eur. Phys. J. B, 15, 567-600, 2000.
Boycott, B. B. and Wässle, H., 1974: The morphological types of ganglion cells of the domestic cat's retina. J. Physiol. 109, 133-151.
Brown, J. E. and Major, D., 1966: Cat retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields. J. Neurophysiol. 20,1091-1100.
Bruno, O. M., Cesar, R. M.Jr., Consularo, L. A. and Costa, L. da F., 1998: Automatic feature selection for biological shape classification in SYNERGOS; in Proc. Brazilian Conference on Computer Graphics, Image Processing and Vision, SIBGRAPI-98, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Out 1998, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 363-370.
Cesar, R. M.Jr. and Costa, L. da F., 1998: Neural cell classification by wavelets and multiscale curvature, Biol. Cybern 79(4), 347-360.
Cesar, R. M.Jr. and Jelinek, H. F., 2003: Segmentation of retinal fundus vasculature in non-mydriatic camera images using wavelets, in J. Suri and T. Laxminarayan (eds.), Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Advanced Segmentation Techniques, CRC Press, New York.
Cook, J. E., 1996: Spatial properties of retinal mosaics: an empirical evaluation of some existing measures. Vis. Neurosci. 13, 15-30.
Cook, J. E. and Chapula, L. M., 2000: Retinal mosaics: New insights into old concepts. tans, 23(1), 26-34.
Costa, L. F. and Cesar, R. M., Jr., 2001: Shape Analysis and Classification: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.
Costa, L. da F., Rios-Filho, L. G., Tanaka, J. S. and Manoel, E. T. M., 2001: Morphological roles of simulated neurons in volume transmission, in R. R. Poznanski (ed.), Biophysical Neural Networks, Mary Ann Liebert, New York, pp. 43-74.
Costa, L. F. and Velte, T. J., 1999: Automatic characterization and classification of ganglion cells from the salamander retina. J. Comp. Neurol 404(1), 35-51.
Dacey, D. M., 1989: Monoamine-accumulating ganglion cell type of the cat's retina. Comp. Neurol. 288, 59-80.
Dowling, J. E., 1979: Information processing by local circuits: The vertebrate retina as a model system, in F. O. Schmitt and F. Gworden (eds.), The Neurosciences 4th Study Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 163-182.
Enroth-Cugell, C. and Robson, J. G., 1966: The contrast sensitivity of ganglion cells of the cat. J. Physiol. 298, 235-250.
Estrozi, L. F., Rios, L. G., Bianchi, A. G. C., Cesar, R. M. Jr. and Costa, L. da F., in press: 1D and 2D Fourier-based approaches to numeric curvature estimation and their comparative performance assessment, Dig. Sig. Proc..
Famiglietti, E. V. and Kolb, H., 1976: Structural basis of “On” and “Off” centre responses in retinal ganglion cells. Science 194, 193-195.
Fernandez, E. and Jelinek, H. F., 2001: Use of fractal theory in neuroscience: Methods, advantages and potential problems. Meth 244, 309-321.
Hartline, H. K., 1938: The response of single optic nerve fibres of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. Am. J. Physiol. 89, 717-743.
Isayama, T., Berson, D. M. and Pu, M., 2000: Theta ganglion cell type of the cat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 417, 32-48.
Jelinek, H. F., Jones, C. and Warfel, M. D., (1998): Is there meaning in fractal analysis, in R. Standish et al. (ed.), Complex Systems’ Conference 98, UNSW, Sydney, pp. 144-149.
Jelinek, H. F. and Spence, I., 1997: Categorisation of physiologically and morphologically characterized nonalpha/ non-beta cat retinal ganglion cells using fractal geometry. Fractals, 5(4), 673-684.
Jones, C. and Jelinek, H. F., 2001:Wavelet packet fractal analysis of neuronal morphology. Meth. 24(4), 347-358.
Kier, C. K., Buchsbaum, G. and Sterling, P., 1995: How retinal microcircuits scale for ganglion cells of different size. J. Neurosci. 15(11), 7673-7683.
Koch, C., Poggio, T. and Torres, V., 1982: Retinal ganglion cells: A functional interpretation of dendritic morphology. Phil. Trans, R. Soc. Lond. B. 298, 227-264.
Kolb, H., Nelson, R. and Mariani, A., 1981: Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: A Golgi study. Vis. Res. 21, 1081-1114.
Kuffler, S. W., 1953: Discharge patterns and functional organisation retina. J. Neurophys. 16, 37-68.
Leicester, J. and Stone, J., 1967: Ganglion, amacrine and horizontal cells of the cat's retina. Vis. Res. 7, 695-705.
Leventhal, A., Rodieck, R.W. and Dreher, B., 1985: Central projections of the cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 237, 216-226.
Leventhal, A. and Schall, J., 1983: Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 220, 465-475.
Levick, W. R., 1975: Form and function of the cat retinal ganglion cells. Nature 254, 659-662.
Levick, W. R. and Thibos, L. N., 1983: Analysis of orientation bias in the cat retina. J. Physiol. 329, 243-261.
Montague, P. R. and Friedlander, M. J., 1991: Morphogenesis and territorial coverage by isolated mammalian retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 11(5), 1440-1457.
Morigiwa, K., Tauchi, M. and Fukuda, Y., 1989: Fractal analysis of ganglion cell dendritic branching patterns of the rat and cat retinae. Neurosci. Res. Suppl. S131-S140.
Panico, J. and Sterling, P., 1995: Retinal neurones and vessels are not fractal but space filling. J. Comp. Neurol. 361, 479-490.
Peichl, L., 1989: Alpha and delta ganglion cells in the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 286, 120-139.
Pinto, S. C. D., Cesar, R. M.Jr., Gokcay, D. and Costa, L. da F., 2002: 3D morphological analysis of brain MRI using wavelets, in A. N. Skodras and A. G. Constantinides (eds.), Proceedings of DSP 2002-14th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, Typorama/IEEE, pp. 399-402.
Reece, B. E. and Galli-Resta, L., 2002: The role of tangential dispersion in retinal mosaic formation. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 21, 153-168.
Robinson, D. W. and Chalupa, L. M., 1997: The intrinsic temporal properties of alpha and beta retinal ganglion cells are equivalent. Curr. Biol. 7, 366-374.
Rodieck, R.W., 1991: The density recovery profile: A method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies. Vis. Neurosci. 6, 95-111.
Rodieck, R. W. and Brening, R. K., 1983: Retinal ganglion cells: Properties, types, genera, pathways and transspecies comparisons. Brain, Behav. Evol. 23, 121-164.
Rowe, M. H. and Stone, J., 1977: Naming of neurons. Brain, Behav. Evol. 14, 185-216.
Saito, H., 1983: Morphology of physiologically identified X-, Y-, and W-type retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 211, 279-288.
Shkolnik-Yarros, E. G., 1971: Neurons of the cat retina. Vis. Res. 11, 7-26.
Stanford, L. R., 1987: X-cells in the cat retina: Relationships between morphology and physiology of a class of cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophys. 58(5), 940-963.
Stanford, L. R. and Sherman, M. S., 1984: Structure/function relationships of retinal ganglion cells in the cat. Brain Res. 297, 381-386.
Stone, J., 1983: Parallel Processing in the Visual System, Plenum, New York.
Theodoridis, S. and Koutroumbas, K., 1999: Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, New York.
Thompson, D. W., 1992: On Growth and Form, Canto edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Troy, J. B. and Shou, T., 2002: The receptive field of cat retinal ganglion cells in physiological and pathological states: Where are we after half a century of research. Prog. Ret. Eye Res. 21, 263-302.
Tyner, C. F., 1975: The naming of neurons: Applications of taxonomic theory to the study of cellular populations. Brain, Behav. Evol. 12, 75-96.
Van Pelt, J. and Schierwagen, A., 1994: Electrotonic properties of passive dendritic trees-effect of dendritic topology, in J. van Pelt, M. A. Corner, H. B. M. Uylings, and F. H. Lopes da Silva (eds.), Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 102: The Self-Organisation of the Brain: From Growth Cones to Functional Networks, Elsevier, New York, pp. 127-149.
Wässle, H. and Boycott, B. B., 1991: Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. Physiol. Rev. 71(2), 447-480.
Wässle, H., Boycott, B. B. and Illing, R. B., 1981a: Morphology and mosaic of on-and off-beta cells in the cat retina and some functional considerations. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 212, 177-197.
Wässle, H. Peichl, L. and Boycott, B. B., 1981b: Morphology and topography of on-and off-alpha cells in cat retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 212, 157-175.
Wässle, H. Peichl, L. and Boycott, B. B., 1981c: Dendritic territories of cat retinal ganglion cells. Nature 292, 344-345.
Wässle, H., Voigt, T. and Patel, B., 1987: Morphological and immunocytochemical identification of indolamineaccumulating neurons in the cat retina. J. Neurosci. 7(5),1574-1585.
Welkowitz, J., Ewen, R. B. and Cohen, J., 1976: Introductory Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Academic Press, New York.
White, C. A. and Chalupa, L. M., 1991: Subgroup of alpha ganglion cells in the adult cat retina is immunoreactive for somatostatin. J. Comp. Neurol. 304, 1-13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jelinek, H.F., Cesar, R.M. & Leandro, J.J.G. Exploring Wavelet Transforms for Morphological Differentiation Between Functionally Different Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells. Brain and Mind 4, 67–90 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024112215968
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024112215968