Skip to main content
Log in

Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991). De la Justification: Les Economies de la Grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertok, L., Stengers, I. and Gille, D. (1990). Mémoires d'un Hérétique. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, E. B. V. (2004) “Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies,” Common Knowledge 10:3, 463–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (1996). Naissance d'une Théorie Éthologique. Paris: Les Empécheurs de Penser en Rond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1989). Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (2000). Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (Eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, Covelo, and London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988a). “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Steve Woolgar (ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage. 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope –Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeyesekere, G. (1997). The Apotheosis of Captain Cook. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, T. (1994). L'influence qui Guérit. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1995). How “Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, For Example. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. H. (1988), Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (1996-7). Cosmopolitiques (Vol. 1–7). Paris: La Découverte, Les Empécheurs de Penser en Rond.

  • Stengers, I. (2000). The Invention of Modern Science. Theory Out of Bounds vol. 19. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2002). Penser avec Whitehead: UneLlibre et Sauvage Creation de Concepts. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. and Ralet, O. (1991). Drogues, le Défi Hollandaise. Paris: Laboratoire Delagrange.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casper Bruun Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, C.B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Hum Stud 29, 107–122 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-9016-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-9016-z

Keywords

Navigation