We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
It would be, at this hour of the day, supererogatory to argue the pre-eminence of Locke's influence on eighteenth-century thought. But though this claim has been made often enough,1 and has often enough been shown to be true, it has not been shown for aesthetics. I believe it to be true of aesthetics as well, but that the fact has gone unremarked, because the line of influence here is not so overt as in the case of, say, political theory or epistemology. It is, rather, oblique and devious; that the influence is there at all is, even, paradoxical.
page 40 note 1 ‘The book that had most influence in the eighteenth century, the Bible excepted, was Locke's Essay concerning HumanUnderstanding.’—Google ScholarKenneth, MacLean, John Locke and English Literature of the Eighteenth Century (Yale Univ. Press, 1936),Google Scholar p. v. Cf., also, Aaron, R. I., John Locke, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, 1955), p. 303.Google Scholar
page 40 note 2 Jerome, Stolnitz, ‘On the Origins of “Aesthetic Disinterestedness”,’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20 (1971), 131–43Google Scholar
page 40 note 3 John, Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Fraser, (New York: Dover, 1959), II, XXII, 10; 1, 387. Italics in original.Google Scholar
page 41 note 1 I, 14.
page 41 note 2 I, 31.
page 41 note 3 Op. cit., p. 307.
page 41 note 4 II, XI, 2; I, 204.
page 41 note 5 III, X, 34; II, 146.
page 41 note 6 III, X, 34; II, 146-47.
page 41 note 7 III, X, 34; II, 147.
page 41 note 8 II, XII, 5; I, 215-16.
page 42 note 1 II, II, 1; I, 145.
page 42 note 2 II, II, 2; I, 145.
page 42 note 3 II, XII, 1; 1, 213.
page 42 note 4 Cf. Aaron, , op. cit., pp. 111-12;Google ScholarJames, Gibson, Locke's Theory of Knowledge and its Historical Relations (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1917), pp. 51 ff.;Google ScholarO'Connor, D. J., John Locke (London: Penguin, 1952), pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
page 42 note 5 The passage—II, I, 25—cited by both. Mr Aaron and Mr O'Connor in support of their view is, however, consistent with the original position, for what it says about simple ideas is not clearly definitional and can be construed at least as readily as an empirical assertion. It might further be noted that this passage precedes chap. II, which is explicitly devoted to simple ideas, and also that ‘unanalysable’ is much closer to the meaning of ‘simple’ than is ‘given’.Google Scholar
page 42 note 6 Until the fourth edition; cf. II, XII, 1; I, 213-14.
page 42 note 7 II, XII, 1; I, 214; cf., also, II, XXIII, 3; I, 392-93.
page 42 note 8 II, XII, 1; 1, 214.
page 42 note 9 II, XXIII, 1; I, 390.
page 42 note 10 II, XXIII, 6; I, 396.
page 43 note 1 III, IV, 2; 11, 32.
page 43 note 2 II, XXII, 2; I, 381-82; III, V, 2; II, 43.
page 43 note 3 III, V, 6; II, 46; cf., also, III, IX, 7; II, 107.
page 43 note 4 III, IV, 2; II, 32; III, IV, 17; II, 42.
page 43 note 5 III, V, 12; II, 51.
page 43 note 6 III, IX, 7; II, 107-8.
page 43 note 7 II, XXII, 2; I, 382.
page 43 note 8 Gf. above, p. 41.
page 43 note 9 II, XII, 5; I, 216.
page 44 note 1 III, IX, 7; II, 107.
page 44 note 2 Figure is, strictly, a simple mode, but cf. III, IV, 17; II, 42.
page 44 note 3 Cf.Aaron, , op. cit., pp. 211, 216.Google Scholar
page 44 note 4 III, V, 8; II, 48.
page 44 note 5 [Francis Hutcheson], An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, 2nd ed. (London, 1726), p. 96. The spelling and punctuation have been modernized.Google Scholar
page 44 note 6 Cf., e.g., pp. 6, 81.
page 44 note 7 Cf. above, pp. 40-41.
page 44 note 8 Op. cit., pp. IX-X, 96 ff.
page 44 note 9 Anthony, , Earl of Shaftesbury, Second Characters or The Language of Forms, ed. Rand, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1914), p. 178.Google Scholar
page 44 note 10 Cf. Gibson, , op. cit., pp. 21-22; Aaron, , op. cit., pp. 110 ff; O'Connor, , op. cit., pp. 29-31, 41-44.Google Scholar
page 45 note 1 Cf., e.g., II, XI, 14; I, 210.
page 45 note 2 Op. cit., p. 7.
page 45 note 3 Ibid., p. 7.
page 45 note 4 Ibid., pp. 5-7; cf., also, p.XIII.
page 45 note 5 Ibid., p. 7.
page 45 note 6 Ibid., p. 9; c.f., also, p. XIII.
page 45 note 7 Ibid., sect. III.
page 45 note 8 Ibid., p. 15.
page 45 note 9 Ibid., sect. IV.
page 46 note 1 Speaking now of ‘absolute beauty’ only.
page 46 note 2 Ibid., pp. 17ff.
page 46 note 3 Ibid., pp. 8-9.
page 46 note 4 Cf. Jerome, Stolnitz, ‘On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory’, Philosophical Quarterly, 11 (1961), 110–11.Google Scholar
page 46 note 5 Francis, Hutcheson, A System of Moral Philosophy (London, 1755), 1, 15.Google Scholar
page 46 note 6 Cf. above, p. 42.
page 46 note 7 Op. cit., pp. 7, 9, 82.
page 46 note 8 Ibid., pp. 4, 11.
page 46 note 9 Ibid., pp. 11-12.
page 46 note 10 Ibid., p. 87.
page 46 note 11 Ibid., sect. VI. Cf., similarly, [Francis, Hutcheson], An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections (London, 1728), pp. XI, 4, 27-28.Google Scholar
page 46 note 12 On Locke's use of ‘internal sense’, cf. II, I, 4; I, 123; II, XX, 3; I, 303.Google Scholar
page 47 note 1 Ibid., p.7. Italics in orginal.
page 47 note 2 Essay on … the Passions, p. 2. Cf. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, II, IX, 2; I, 183; II, XI, 15; 1, 211.Google Scholar
page 48 note 1 Op. cit., p. 7.
page 48 note 2 Ibid., p. 86.
page 48 note 3 Cf. The Works of Joseph Addison, ed. Greene, (New York: Putnams, 1856), VI, 335, 347, 349.Google Scholar
page 48 note 4 Spectator, no. 413, pp. 332-33. Addison seems to be using ‘operations’ in Locke's sense; cf. Essay, II, I, 4; I, 124.Google Scholar
page 48 note 5 No. 412, p. 329.
page 48 note 6 II, VII, 2; I, 160.
page 48 note 7 Browne, P. (1697), quoted in Yolton, John W., John Locke and the Way of Ideas (Oxford Univ. Press, 1956), p. 88.Google Scholar
page 48 note 8 No. 412, p. 329.
page 48 note 9 No. 412, p. 328.
page 48 note 10 No. 412, p. 327.
page 48 note 11 I, I, 15; I, 48.
page 49 note 1 II, XVII, 6; I, 280.
page 49 note 2 No. 413, p. 333; cf., also, no. 420, p. 367.
page 49 note 3 No. 412, p. 329.
page 49 note 4 No. 412, p. 328.
page 49 note 5 Alexander, Gerard, An Essay on Taste (Edinburgh, 1759).Google Scholar
page 49 note 6 [Henry, Home, Elements of Criticism (Edinburgh, 1762), vol. 1.Google Scholar
page 49 note 7 Edmund, Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Boulton, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958), p. 4. Cf. Essay, I, 11, 28-30.Google Scholar
page 49 note 8 Ibid., p. 1.
page 49 note 9 Ibid., pp., pp. 45, 91, 129-30.
page 49 note 10 No. 412, p. 331.
page 50 note 1 What follows is taken, in large measure, from Jerome, Stolnitz, ‘“Beauty”: Some Stages in the History of an Idea’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 22 (1961), sect. II.Google Scholar
page 50 note 2 Op. cit., p. 91.
page 50 note 3 Ibid., p. 91.
page 50 note 4 Ibid., p. 46.
page 50 note 5 Ibid., p. 57.
page 50 note 6 Ibid., pp. 149-51.
page 50 note 7 Ibid., pp. 113-14.
page 50 note 8 Cf., however, p. 57.
page 50 note 9 Ibid., p. 124.
page 50 note 10 Ibid., p. 125; cf., also, pp. 5, 159.
page 50 note 11 Ibid., p. 157.
page 50 note 12 Ibid., pp. 39, 86.
page 50 note 13 Ibid., pp. 58-60.
page 50 note 14 Ibid., p. 119.
page 51 note 1 I, III, 26; I, 118.
