Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:45:02.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power types in explicit mathematics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Gerhard Jäger
Gerhard Jäger*
Affiliation:
Institut Für Informatik und Angewandte Mathematik, Universität Bern, Neubrückstrasse 10, Ch-3012 Bern, Switzerland, E-mail: jaeger@iam.unibe.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note it is shown that in explicit mathematics the strong power type axiom is inconsistent with (uniform) elementary comprehension and discuss some general aspects of power types in explicit mathematics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 1142 - 1146
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Beeson, M. J., Foundations of constructive mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Feferman, S., A language and axioms for explicit mathematics, Algebra and logic (Crossley, J. N., editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 450, Springer-Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar
[3]Feferman, S., Constructive theories of functions and classes, Logic colloquium '78 (Boffa, M., van Dalen, D., and McAloon, K., editors), North-Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
[4]Feferman, S. and Jäger, G., Systems of explicit mathematics with non-constructive μ-operator, Part II, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 79 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Glass, Th., On power set in explicit mathematics, this Journal, vol. 61 (1996), no. 2, pp. 468–489.Google Scholar
[6]Troelstra, A. S. and van Dalen, D., Constructivism in mathematics, vol. I, North-Holland, 1988.Google Scholar