Skip to main content
Log in

Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine enforcement action in China’s emerging markets by focusing on (1) the agents that impose this action and (2) the role played by supervisory boards. Using newly available databases, we find that supervisory boards play an active role when Chinese listed companies face enforcement action. Listed firms with larger supervisory boards are more likely to have more severe sanctions imposed upon them by the China Security Regulatory Commission, and listed companies that face more severe enforcement actions have more supervisory board meetings. Our findings are of interest, as supervisory boards in China are generally perceived to be dysfunctional. This study contributes to the existing literature in three ways. First, we shed light on the effects of supervisory boards whose role in a fraud setting has not yet been examined. Second, the study has important policy implications for governance reform. Finally, our analyses provide the most up-to-date picture of fraud and governance issues in China’s ever-growing markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 57–116. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.M. (2000). Taking Stock in China: Company Disclosure and Information in China’s Stock Markets. The Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 1919–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., G. Caprio and R. Levine: 2007, Bank Regulations are Changing: But for Better or Worse, Working paper (Brown University)

  • Baucus, M.S., & Near, J.P. (1991). Can Illegal Corporate Behavior Be Predicted? An Event History Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 9–36. doi:10.2307/256300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. Accounting Review, 71, 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M., & Salterio, S. (2001). The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 539–570. doi:10.1506/RM1J-A0YM-3VMV-TAMV

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M., Firth, M., Gao, D.N., & Rui, O.M. (2005). Is China’s Securities Regulatory Agency a Toothless Tiger? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 451–488. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M., Firth, M., Gao, D.N., & Rui, O.M. (2006). Ownership structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424–448. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., Evans, J., & Nagarajan, N. (2008). Board Size and Firm Performance: the Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 121–145. doi:10.1007/s11156-007-0074-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahya, J., Karbhari, Y., Xiao, J., & Yang, M. (2003). The Usefulness of the Supervisory Board Report in China. Corporate Governance, 11, 308–321. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1996). Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M.L., & Hung, M. (2004). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Worldwide CEO Turnover. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 269–312. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00138.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Guercio, D., Dann, L., & Partch, M. (2003). Governance and Boards of Directors in Closed-End Investment Companies. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 111–152. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00110-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J., Neu, D., & Rahaman, A. (2007). Accounting and the Global Fight against Corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 513–542. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feroz, E.H., Park, K., & Pastena, V.S. (1991). The Financial and Market Effects of the SEC’s Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(Suppl.), 107–142. doi:10.2307/2491006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First Department of Inspection, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC): 2004a, Typical Cases Analyses of Securities and Futures Inspection (year 1993-2000) (Capital Economics and Trade University Press, China) (in Chinese)

  • First Department of Inspection, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC): 2004b, Typical Case Analyses of Securities and Futures Inspection (Year 2001) (Capital Economics and Trade University Press, China) (in Chinese)

  • Firth, M., P. Fung and O. Rui: 2006, `Corporate Performance and CEO Compensation in China', Journal of Corporate Finance 12, 693–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Fung, P., & Rui, O. (2007). Ownership, Two-Tier Board Structure, and the Informativeness of Earnings – Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 463–496. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Mo, P.L.L., & Wong, R.M.K. (2005). Financial Statement Frauds and Auditor Sanctions: An Analysis of Enforcement Actions in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 367–381. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0542-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880. doi:10.2307/2329018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: an Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and Finance. The Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155. doi:10.1086/250042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. and J. Wu: 2007, ‹Corruption: Why China Thrives Despite Corruption’, Far Eastern Economic Review (April), 6

  • Liu, T.M. (2005). The Case Analysis on Failures of Enterprise Internal Control in Mainland China. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 7(1), 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, B. 2007, “China Securities Regulation”, Higher Education Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, O.: 2006, ‹The Effects of Fraud and Lawsuit Revelation on U.S. Executive Turnover and Compensation’, Journal of Business Ethics 64, 405–419. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0018-1

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783. doi:10.2307/2329497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, M.: 2002, ‹To Encourage Recovery, Encourage Investors’, The New York Times, December 29

  • Szwajkowski, E. (1985). Organizational Illegality: Theoretical Integration and Illustrative Application. Academy of Management Review, 10, 558–567. doi:10.2307/258136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113–142. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, C. (2006). In Search of an Effective Monitoring Board Model: Board Reforms and the Political Economy of Corporate Law in China. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 22, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J., Dahya, J., & Lin, Z. (2004). A Grounded Theory Exposition of the Role of the Supervisory Board in China. British Journal of Management, 15, 39–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.t01-1-00399.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuations of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujun Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, C., Ding, S., Li, Y. et al. Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 90, 561–576 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0061-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0061-9

Key words

Navigation