Abstract
Studies focusing on debate as pedagogy have been gaining attention recently. However, most research has employed policy debate, which is a traditional debate style. Parliamentary debate, which is an impromptu debate style, has been recently gaining popularity worldwide. As minimal research exists on parliamentary debate as pedagogy, the present study examined the correlations between parliamentary debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, argumentativeness, and willingness to communicate. Moreover, this study aimed to investigate the unique characteristics of communication variables and correlations with the experience of participating in a parliamentary debate in a Japanese context, an area that interests many scholars. The results showed some differences in correlations between Japanese and United States samples, which was explained by analyzing a trait of Japanese culture that is characterized as highly contextual. Regarding the correlations between communication variables and parliamentary debate participation, significant differences were found for all variables except for communication competence, where less communication apprehension, more argument approach, less argument avoidance, and more willingness to communicate were observed compared to non-debaters. Finally, the study findings revealed that those with parliamentary debate experience obtained lower scores for communication apprehension and higher scores for argumentative approaches compared with those who did not have such experience; the effect sizes were smaller in women than men. These findings suggest that parliamentary debate participation is an effective way to foster communication variables.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberle, David F., Albert K. Cohen, Arthur K. Davis, Marion J. Levy, and Francis X. Sutton. 1950. The functional prerequisites of a society. Ethics 60: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/290705.
Aclan, Eunice M., and Noor Hashima Abd. Aziz. 2014. Exploring parliamentary debate as a pedagogical tool to develop English communication skills in EFL/ESL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 4: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.1.
Akerman, Rodie, and Ian Neale. 2011. Debating the evidence: An international review of current situation and perceptions. CfBT Education Trust [in association with. http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/ESU_Report_debatingtheevidence_FINAL.pdf. English-Speaking Union].
Allen, Mike, and John Bourhis. 1996. The relationship of communication apprehension to communication behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Quarterly 44: 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370011.
Allen, Mike, Mary Trejo, Michael Bartanen, Anthony Schroeder, and Tammie Ulrich. 2004. Diversity in United States forensics: A report on research conducted for the American Forensic Association. Argumentation and Advocacy 40: 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2004.11821605.
Anderson, Carolyn M., Matthew M. Martin, Mei Zhong, and Daniel West. 1997. Reliability, separation of factors, and sex differences on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure: A Chinese sample. Communication Research Reports 14: 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388645.
Aonuma, Satoru, Junya Morooka, and Kazuhiko Seno. 2014. Revisiting the U.S. footprints: A critical exploration of interscholastic/intercollegiate policy debate in post-World War II Japan. In Disturbing argument, ed. Catharine H. Palczewski, 432–437. New York: Routledge.
Barraclough, Robert A., Diane M. Christophel, and James C. McCroskey. 1988. Willingness to communicate: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports 5: 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359822.
Beer, Lawrence W. 1984. Freedom of expression in Japan: A study in comparative law, politics and society. New York: Kodansha International.
Binkley, Marlyn, Ola Erstad, Joan Herman, Senta Raizen, Martin Ripley, May Miller-Ricci, and Mike Rumble. 2011. Defining twenty-first-century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, ed. Patrick Griffin, Barry McGaw, and Esther Care, 17–66. New York: Springer.
Brown, N. Anthony. 2009. Argumentation and debate in foreign language instruction: A case for the traditional classroom facilitating advanced-level language uptake. Modern Language Journal 93: 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00929.x.
Colbert, Kent R. 1993. The effects of debate participation on argumentativeness and verbal aggression. Communication Education 42: 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529309378928.
Cook, Emma E. 2014. Intimate expectations and practices: Freeter relationships and marriage in contemporary Japan. Asian Anthropology 13: 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2014.883120.
Copeland, Kristopher, Jacob Stutzman, and Sarah Collins. 2015. Connecting forensics and assessment in the twenty-first century. Communication Studies 66: 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1057606.
Council of Europe. 2018. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment, companion volume with new descriptors. http://ojs.elte.hu/modernnyelvok/article/download/1466/1248. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Croucher, Stephen Michael, Stephanie Kelly, Mark Burkey, Anthony Spencer, Oscar Gomez, Carmencita del Villar, and Nadirabegim Eskiçorapçı. 2021. A multi-national validity analysis of the argumentativeness measure. International Journal of Conflict Management 32: 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2020-0027.
Demir, Yeliz, and Dale Hample. 2019. A cross-cultural study of argument orientations of Turkish and American college students: Is silence really golden and speech silver for Turkish students? Argumentation 33: 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09483-1.
Donovan, Leslie A., and Peter D. MacIntyre. 2004. Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports 21: 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409360006.
Dowling, Ralph E., and Lyle J. Flint. 1990. The argumentativeness scale: Problems and promise. Communication Studies 41: 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979009368300.
Eckstein, Justin, and Michael Bartanen. 2015. British parliamentary debate and the twenty-first-century student. Communication Studies 66: 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1056916.
Friedley, Sheryl A., and Manchester, Bruce B. 1985. An analysis of male/female participation at select national championships. National Forensic Journal 3: 1–12. http://www.nationalforensicjournal.org/uploads/9/1/9/3/91938460/vol3no1.pdf.
Hall, Bradford J. 1992. Theories of culture and communication. Communication Theory 2: 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00028.x.
Hornikx, Jos, and Hans Hoeken. 2007. Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence quality. Communication Monographs 74: 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701716578.
Howe, William T., and Ioana A. Cionea. 2021. Exploring the associations between debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, and argumentativeness with a global sample. Argumentation and Advocacy 57: 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1897274.
Hsu, Chia-Fang. 2007. A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly 55: 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701497831.
Iida, Yumiko. 2005. Beyond the “feminization of masculinity”: Transforming patriarchy with the “feminine” in contemporary Japanese youth culture. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 6: 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000326905.
Iman, Jaya Nur. 2017. Debate instruction in EFL classroom: Impacts on the critical thinking and speaking skill. International Journal of Instruction 10: 87–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1046a.
Infante, Dominic A., and Andrew S. Rancer. 1982. A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment 46: 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13.
Infante, Dominic A., Andrew S. Rancer, and Charles J. Wigley. 2011. In defense of the argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness scales. Communication Quarterly 59: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.563439.
Inoue, Narahiko. 1996. Traditions of ‘debate’ in Japan. Bulletin of the graduate school of social and cultural studies. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Narahiko-Inoue/publication/31903660_Traditions_of_Debate_in_Japan/links/0c96051bdfc98904d1000000/Traditions-of-Debate-in-Japan.pdf. Kyushu University, 2.
Inoue, Narahiko, and Nakano, Mika. 2006. The costs and benefits of participating in competitive debate activities. Contemporary perspectives on argumentation: Views from the Venice argumentation conference.
Jodoi, Kota. 2019. The educational effect of parliamentary debate and suggestions for introducing it into university class. Bulletin of KIKAN Education 5: 29–42.
Jordan-Jackson, Felecia F., Yang Lin, Andrew S. Rancer, and Dominic A. Infante. 2008. Perceptions of males and females’ use of aggressive affirming and nonaffirming messages in an interpersonal dispute: You’ve come a long way baby? Western Journal of Communication 72: 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310802210122.
Kim, Youllee, Sungeun Chung, and Dale Hample. 2020. How do culture, individual traits, and context influence Koreans’ interpersonal arguing? Toward a more comprehensive analysis of interpersonal arguing. Argumentation 34: 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09482-2.
King, Jim. 2013. Silence in the second language classrooms of Japanese Universities. Applied Linguistics 34: 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams043.
Kotowski, Michael R., Timothy R. Levine, Colin R. Baker, and Jeffrey M. Bolt. 2009. A multitrait-multimethod validity assessment of the verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness scales. Communication Monographs 76: 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903300247.
Levine, Timothy R., Michael R. Kotowski, Michael J. Beatty, and Martijn J. van Kelegom. 2012. A meta-analysis of trait-behavior correlations in argumentativeness and verbal aggression. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31: 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425037.
Lewis, Richard D. 2005. Finland, cultural lone wolf. Boston: Intercultural Press.
Lucas, Jenifer. 1984. Communication apprehension in the ESL classroom: Getting our students to talk. Foreign Language Annals 17: 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01748.x.
MacIntyre, Peter D., Richard Clément, Zoltan Dörnyei, and Kimberly A. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82: 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x.
MacIntyre, Peter D. 1994. Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports 11: 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099409359951.
Majidi, Abid E., Daniel Janssen, and Rick de Graaff. 2021. The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System 101: 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576.
Masuda, Takahiko, and Richard E. Nisbett. 2001. Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922.
McCroskey, James C. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40: 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817.
McCroskey, James C. 2005. An introduction to rhetorical communication: A western rhetorical perspective. New York: Routledge.
McCroskey, James C., and Virginia P. Richmond. 1987. Willingness to communicate. In Personality and interpersonal communication, ed. James C. McCroskey and John A. Daly, 129–156. Newbury, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, James C., and Linda L. McCroskey. 1988a. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports 5 (2): 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810.
McCroskey, James C., and Linda L. McCroskey. 1988b. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports 5: 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810.
McCroskey, James C., Joan M. Fayer, and Virginia P. Richmond. 1985a. Don’t speak to me in English: Communication apprehension in Puerto Rico. Communication Quarterly 33: 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369597.
McCroskey, James C., William B. Gudykunsy, and Tsukasa Nishida. 1985b. Communication apprehension among Japanese students in native and second languages. Communication Research Reports 2: 11–15.
McCroskey, James C., Virginia P. Richmond, Nancy F. Burroughs, and Ake Daun. 1990. Correlates of quietness: Swedish and American perspectives. Communication Quarterly 38 (2): 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379009369749.
Meyer, Erin. 2014. The culture map: Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business. New York: Public Affairs.
Mishima, Masakazu, and Yuka Yamamoto. 2020. Japanese English learners’ responses to English debate: Insights from a pilot class. JAAL in JACET Proceedings 2: 15–22.
Mitchell, Gordon R. 2021. Debating with robots: IBM project debater and the advent of augmentative automated argumentation. In Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Argumentation 6: 91–102.
Morooka, Junya. 2020. Gender diversity in debate in Japan: An examination of debate competitions at the secondary and tertiary levels. In Networking argument, ed. Carol Winkler, 519–526. London.
Nakamura, Hiroko, Kazuhiro Nomura, and Namie Saeki. 2020. An acoustic study of communication apprehension during English oral presentations by Japanese university students. English Language Teaching 13: 178. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n8p178.
Neuliep, James W., Michelle Chadouir, and James C. McCroskey. 2003. A cross-cultural test of the association between temperament and communication apprehension. Communication Research Reports 20: 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388831.
Nisbett, Richard E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. London: Nicolas Brealey.
Rogers, Jack E., P. Freeman. Nicole, R. Arthur, and Rennels. 2017. Where are they now (?): Two decades of longitudinal outcome assessment data linking positive student, graduate student, career and life trajectory decisions to participation in Intercollegiate Competitive Debate. National Forensic Journal 35: 10–28.
Rubin, Rebecca B., Alan M. Rubin, and Felecia F. Jordan. 1997. Effects of instruction on communication apprehension and communication competence. Communication Education 46: 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379080.
Schwartz-DuPre, Rae Lynn. 2006. Women in debate: From virtual to material. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 27: 106–121. https://www.academia.edu/download/35236872/Schwartz-DuPre_Women_in_Debate_Essay.pdf.
Shamsudin, Mardziah, Moomala Othman, Maryam Jahedi, and Dalia Aralas. 2017. Enhancing English learners’ willingness to communicate through debate and philosophy inquiry discussion. English Language Teaching 10: 145. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n8p145.
Snider, Alfred, and Maxwell Schnurer. 2006. Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. New York: International Debate Education Association.
Subanaliev, Talgat, Stephen Croucher, Elira Turdubayeva, and Stephanie Kelly. 2018. An exploratory analysis of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan. Russian Journal of Communication 10: 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084.
Suzuki, Takeshi. 2008. Japanese argumentation: Vocabulary and culture. Argumentation and Advocacy 45: 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2008.11821695.
Suzuki, Shinobu, and Andrew S. Rancer. 1994. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: Testing for conceptual and measurement equivalence across cultures. Communication Monographs 61: 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376336.
Takai, Jiro, and Hiroshi Ota. 1994. Assessing Japanese interpersonal communication competence. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33: 224–236. https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.33.224.
Tamura, Mika. 2014. The sound of silence in chemistry lecture: A case of Japanese graduate students in science and engineering. Kyushu Communication Studies 12: 46–59.
Tanaka, Masako. 1984. Maternal authority in the Japanese family. Senri Ethnological Studies 11: 227–236.
Thompson, Catherine A., Satoshi Ishii, and Donald Klopf. 1990. Japanese and Americans compared on assertiveness/responsiveness. Psychological Reports 66: 829–830. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.829.
Uchida, Satoru, and Masashi, Negishi. 2018. Assigning CEFR-J levels to English texts based on textual features. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific corpus linguistics conference (APCLC 2018), eds. Tono, Yukio, and Isahara, Hitoshi, 463–467.
Uchida, Satoru, and Negishi Masashi. 2021. Estimating the CEFR levels of English reading materials: Evaluation of CVLA. Journal of Corpus-Based Lexicology Studies 3: 1–14.
World Economic Forum. 2021. Global gender gap report 2021. World Economic Forum.
Xie, Yun, Dale Hample, and Xiaoli Wang. 2015. A cross-cultural analysis of argument predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, and personalization of conflict. Argumentation 29: 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8.
Yashima, Tomoko. 2002. Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal 86: 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136.
Zare, Pezhman, and Moomala Othman. 2015. Students’ perceptions toward using classroom debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science 11: 158–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p158.
Zompetti, Joseph P. 2000. Revisiting Topoi: Their use for contemporary argumentation and debate. Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Argumentation 1: 188–190.
Zorwick, Leslie Wade, and James M. Wade. 2016. Enhancing civic education through the use of assigned advocacy, argumentation, and debate across the curriculum. Communication Education 65: 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1203005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jodoi, K. The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context. Argumentation 37, 91–118 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09591-5