Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:05:56.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Practically Informed Morality of War: Just War, International Law, and a Changing World Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2017

James Turner Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Just war, international law, and world order are all historically conditioned realities that interrelate with one another in complex ways. This paper explores their historical development and current status while critically examining their interrelationship. It begins with exploring just war as a basic frame for analysis and interconnection with the other two realities. Just war is not an abstract body of moral thought but instead a practically informed morality of war rooted in Christian thought and law, Roman law, and the practice of statecraft. The essay notes the importance of the ideas of jus gentium and jus naturale in just war's fundamental formation, as well as the parallel between its three basic features—sovereign authority, just cause, and the end of peace—and the three goods or ends of politics as classically defined, namely, order, justice, and peace. The essay then moves out to explore the historical and thematic relations between just war tradition and international law, especially the law of war, arguing that these together define a moral and legal structure that is normative for world order. The final section of the paper considers the functioning of the institutions of world order in the context of challenges from rival cultural understandings of war, law, and world order and from the rise of nonstate actors in the international sphere, arguing for dialogical efforts aimed at strengthening both the moral and legal basis for world order against contemporary threats to that order.

Keywords

just warinternational lawlaw of warworld orderjus gentiumjus naturaleinternational institutionsnonstate actorscross-cultural dialogue
Type
Roundtable: The Roles of International Law and Just War Theory
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 2017 , pp. 453 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 This analysis summarizes that developed more fully in my work as a whole: see further Johnson, James Turner, Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; and Sovereignty: Moral and Historical Perspectives (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2014)Google Scholar.

2 See further Johnson, James Turner, Ethics and the Use of Force (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2011), pp. 129–66Google Scholar.

3 Roberts, Adam and Guelff, Richard, Documents on the Laws of War, Third Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 69 Google Scholar.

4 See Johnson, James Turner, “The Ethics of Insurgency,” Ethics & International Affairs 31, no. 3 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.