Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T07:22:34.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Aesthetics Be Global?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2023

Eileen John
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophical aesthetics is to some extent beholden to what I will call personal aesthetics. By personal aesthetics, I mean the phenomena of individual aesthetic sensitivity: how each of us discerns and responds to elements of experience. I take that sensitivity to be finely woven into feeling to some degree at home in the world. There is something extremely local, and in a certain sense unreflective, about personal aesthetics – it is hard to notice one's own, historically specific aesthetic formation. Philosophical aesthetics, meanwhile, aspires to understand aesthetic life in a more reflective and general way. Aesthetic theories in the Western tradition, like most philosophical theories, try to articulate universally relevant and illuminating theoretical concepts and values. But can a theory of this kind acknowledge what is important at the level of personal aesthetics? Can aesthetic theories find fruitful application while also respecting the locality and variability of aesthetic sensitivity? What kinds of theoretical ambition and humility are called for in philosophical aesthetics?

Type
Paper
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 93: Expanding Horizons , May 2023 , pp. 209 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baggini, Julian, ‘Dreams of Utopia: On the Absence of Place’, Think, 55:19 (2020), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe, Aesthetics, 2nd edition (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhushan, Nalini, ‘Toward a Development of a Cosmopolitan Aesthetic’, Contemporary Aesthetics, 0:2 (2009), np.Google Scholar
Gene Blocker, H., ‘Non-Western Aesthetics as a Colonial Invention’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 35:4 (2001), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Nice, Richard (trans.), (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Carey, John, The Unexpected Professor (London: Faber & Faber, 2014).Google Scholar
Chimakonam, J.O., ‘African Philosophy and Global Epistemic Injustice’, Journal of Global Ethics, 13:2 (2017), 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Ethics Without Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, Susan and Maynard, Patrick, Aesthetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis, Jr., The Signifying Monkey (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, Familiar Stranger: A Life Between Two Islands (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hamper, Ben, Rivethead (New York: Warner, 1986).Google Scholar
Higgins, Kathleen, Aesthetics in Perspective (Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace, 1996).Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted (ed.), Philosophy Through Its Past (Middlesex: Penguin, 1984).Google Scholar
Kingston, Maxine Hong, The Woman Warrior (New York: Vintage Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Hussain, Mazhar and Wilkinson, Robert (eds.), The Pursuit of Comparative Aesthetics: An Interface Between the East and West (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgement, Guyer, Paul (ed. and trans.) and Matthews, Eric (trans.), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maira, Shakti, ‘The Hollowing of Art and the Call of Beauty’, in Higgins, Kathleen, Maira, Shakti, Sikka, Sonia (eds.), Artistic Visions and the Promise of Beauty: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (Cham: Springer, 2017), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wah Man, Eva Kit, Cross-Cultural Reflections on Chinese Aesthetics, Gender, Embodiment and Learning (Singapore: Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitova, Veli, ‘Decolonising Knowledge Here and Now’, Philosophical Papers, 49:2 (2020), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Toni, The Bluest Eye (London: Vintage, 1999).Google Scholar
Thi Nguyen, C. and Strohl, Matthew, ‘Cultural Appropriation and the Intimacy of Groups’, Philosophical Studies, 176 (2019), 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nzegwu, Nkiru, ‘African Art in Deep Time: De-race-ing Aesthetics and De-racializing Visual Art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 77:4 (2019), 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Harold, Aesthetics and Art Theory (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970).Google Scholar
Plato, Republic, Waterfield, Robin (trans.), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Potter, Karl (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyaya-Vaisesika up to Gangesa, Vol. 2 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radano, Ronald and Olaniyan, Tejumola (eds.), Audible Empire: Music, Global Politics, Critique (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Yuriko, Everyday Aesthetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Yuriko, ‘The Japanese Aesthetics of Imperfection and Insufficiency’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55:4 (1997), 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartwell, Crispin, Six Names of Beauty (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger, A Short History of Modern Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard, ‘Of the Scandal of Taste: Social Privilege as Nature in the Aesthetic Theories of Hume and Kant’, Philosophical Forum, 20:3 (1989), 211–229.Google Scholar
Tan, Sor-hoon, ‘The Concept of Yi in the Mencius and Problems of Distributive Justice’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92:3 (2014), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Paul, Black Is Beautiful (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden, Bryan Van, Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto (New York: Columbia University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Norden, Bryan Van and Garfield, Jay, ‘If Philosophy Won't Diversify, Let's Call It What It Really Is’, New York Times, 11 May 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/opinion/if-philosophy-wont-diversify-lets-call-it-what-it-really-is.html.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian Helmut, ‘Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature’, Philosophy Compass, 4:3 (2009), 380–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherspoon, Gary, ‘Language in Culture and Culture in Language’, International Journal of American Linguistics, 46:1 (1980), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, James O., ‘New Objections to Cultural Appropriation in the Arts’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 61:3 (2021), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar