Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:03:15.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights from Dostoevsky on Parental Decisionmaking in the NICU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2006

JOHN J. PARIS
Affiliation:
Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
NEIL GRAHAM
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois
MICHAEL D. SCHREIBER
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics at the University of Chicago Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
MICHELE GOODWIN
Affiliation:
Health Law Institute, DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, Illinois

Extract

In a recent essay, George Annas, the legal columnist for The New England Journal of Medicine, observed that the resuscitation of extremely premature infants, even over parental objection, is not problematic because “once the child's medical status has been determined, the parents have the legal authority to make all subsequent decisions.” Annas himself is quick to concede that treatment in a high-technology neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently takes on a life of its own. He also acknowledges that although bioethicists and courts agree that there is no ethical or legal difference between withholding or withdrawing a respirator from a patient, parents and physicians find the withdrawal much more emotionally troubling.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: THE POWER OF CHOICE: AUTONOMY, INFORMED CONSENT, AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)