Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T09:04:40.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Avoid the Paretian-Libertarian Paradox

A Reply to Kelly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Jonathan Pressler
Jonathan Pressler
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussions
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 326 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basu, Kaushik. 1984. “The Right to Give Up Rights.” Economica 51:413–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. 1974. “A Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Claim.” Journal of Economic Theory 7:388–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Jerry S. 1988. “Rights and Social Choice: Comment.” Economics and Philosophy 4:316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressler, Jonathan. 1987. “Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox?” Economics and Philosophy 3:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1970. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.” Journal of Political Economy 78:152–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya 1982. “Liberty, Unanimity and Rights.” In Choice, Welfare and Measurement, pp. 291–326. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar