Skip to main content
Log in

‘Ought’ and ‘Must’

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chisholm, R. M.: 1963, ‘Contrary-to-duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic’, Analysis 24, 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. J. I. and Pörn, I.: 1985, ‘Ideality, Sub-Ideality and Deontic Logic’, Synthese 65, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A.: 1941, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, R.: 1972, The Significance of Sense — Meaning, Modality and Morality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, A.J.I., Pörn, I. ‘Ought’ and ‘Must’. Synthese 66, 89–93 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413581

Navigation