Skip to main content
Log in

An expedient and ethical alternative to xenotransplantation

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current voluntary posthumous organ donation policy fails to provide sufficient organs to meet the demand. In these circumstances xenografts have been regarded as an expedient solution. The public perception seems to be that the only impediments to this technology are technical and biological. There are, however, important ethical issues raised by xenotransplantation that need to be considered as a matter of urgency. When the ethical issues raised by using non-human animals to provide replacement organs for human beings are considered in a wider context and the possible alternatives to xenotransplantation are taken into account, a new dimension is added to the debate. In this broader context it is argued that a less ethically problematic solution is to adopt a presumed consent or opt-out organ procurement policy to regulate posthumous organ harvesting from humans. If there are still too few organs available, then the whole question of transplantation must be reassessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Coordinating Committee of Organ Registries and Donation (ACCORD): 1997, Fact Sheet, Factshee.acc.

  • ACCORD: 1995, Organ Donation Attitudes Research an\Accinfo\attitude.fsh.

  • Australians Donate (Australia's National Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Network): 1998, Monthstats 10.xis.

  • Callahan, J.C.: 1987, ‘On Harming the Dead’, Ethics 97, 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A.L.: 1988, ‘Beg, Borrow, or Steal: The Ethics of Solid Organ Procurement’, In: D. Mathieu (ed.), Organ Substitution Technology. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A.L.: 1989, ‘Ethical Issues Raised by Research Involving Xenografts’, In: T.L. Beauchamp and LeR. Walters (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Third Edition.

  • Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, pp. 535–541.

  • Caplan, A.L.: 1991, ‘Beastly Conduct: Ethical Issues in Animal Experimentation’, In: T.A. Mappes and J.S. Zembaty (eds.), Biomedical Ethics, Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J.F.: 1989, ‘Ethical Criteria for Procuring and Distributing Organs for Transplantation’, In: J.F. Blumstein and F.A. Sloan (eds.), Organ Transplantation Policy. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J.: 1984, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J.: 1985, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Offense to Others. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R.G.: 1980, Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R.G.: 1988, ‘Animal Parts, Human Wholes’, In: J.M. Humber and R.F. Almeder (eds.), Biomedical Ethics Reviews: 1987. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R.: 1991, Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, F.M.: 1993, Morality, Mortality Volume I: Death and Whom to Save from It. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C.R.: 1996, ‘A New Look at Animal-to-Human Organ Transplantation’, Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal 6(2), 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, T.E.: 1993, ‘Future Directions in Transplantation’, Medical Journal of Australia 158(4), 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, D.: 1988, ‘Introduction to Chapter Three’, In: D. Mathieu (ed.), Organ Substitution Technology. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohacsi, P.J., K.L. Herbertt and J.F. Thompson, J.F.: 1993, ‘Donation and Retrieval of Cadaveric Organs in Australia’, The Medical Journal of Australia 158, 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.L.: 1992, ‘Transplantation Through a Glass Darkly’, Hastings Center Report 22(5), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, I.Y.: 1993, ‘The Potential Organ Donor’, The Medical Journal of Australia 158(4), 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A., P. Hickson and G. Curry: 1992, ‘Brain Death and Organ Transplantation: The Experiences of Nurses and Families’, UNE Research Report, 1992, pp. 44–47. The authors cite K. Atkins: 1992, ‘The Body and the Person in Organ Procurement and Donation’, The Australian Nurses Journal 22(1), 20-21.

  • Pitcher, G.: 1984, ‘The Misfortunes of the Dead’, American Philosophical Quarterly 21(2), 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, E.: 1981, ‘Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect’, Ethics 91, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1993, Practical Ethics, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1994, Rethinking Life and Death. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.: 1988, ‘The Rights and Wrongs of Animal Use for Human Organ Transplant’, In: J.M. Humber and R.F. Almeder (eds.), Biomedical Ethics Reviews: 1987. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, D.: 1988, ‘Ethical and Ideological Assumptions of Organ Substitution Policy’, In: D. Mathieu (ed.), Organ Substitution Technology. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, J. An expedient and ethical alternative to xenotransplantation. Med Health Care Philos 2, 31–39 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009980400230

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009980400230

Navigation