Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T11:56:57.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Subject Genesis, the Imaginary and the Poetical Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Gabriele Schwab
Gabriele Schwab*
Affiliation:
University of Constance
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“I am, but I do not own myself”—this famous formula of Plessner conceives man as an excentric subject, i.e. a being who can never dominate and dispose of himself as a whole. If we add to Plessner's dictum Bloch's answer to it: “I am. But I do not own myself. Therefore we are still becoming” then we are already suggesting the anthropological space of the imaginary; because the ability to imagine something that is not, plays an essential role in this subject's becoming.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 29 , Issue 115 , September 1981 , pp. 55 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, E., 1969. Spuren, Gesamtausgabe, Bd. I. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1940. Das Ich und das Es, Ges. Werke, Bd. XIII, London.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1940. Jenseits des Lustprinzips, Ges. Werke, Bd. XIII, London.Google Scholar
Lacan, J., 1966. “Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction du Je,” Écrits. Paris. Cited in the Seuil/Points edition, vol. I.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. 1966. “Introduction au commentaire de Jean Hippolyte sur la “Verneinung” de Freud,” Écrits. Paris.Google Scholar
Mahler, M.S., Pine, F., Bergmann, A., 1975. The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant. New York.Google Scholar
Plessner, H., 21972. “Die anthropologische Dimension der Geschichtlichkeit,” Sozialer Wandel-Zivilisation und Fortschritt als Kategorien der soziologischen Theorie, hg. H.P. Dreitzel. Neuwied.Google Scholar
Riccoeur, P., 1965. De l'Interprétation: Essai sur Freud. Paris.Google Scholar
Schwab, G., 1981. “Das augenlose Schweigen-Zur Subjektivität in Virginia Woolfs The Waves,” Freiburger literaturpsychologische Gespräche, hgg. S. Cremerius, W. Mauser, C. Pietzcker, F. Wyatt. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schwab, G. 1981. Samuel Becketts Endspiel mit der Subjektivität—Entwurf einer Psychoästhetik des modernen Theaters. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnicott, D.W., 1971. Playing and Reality, London.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D.W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. New York.Google Scholar