Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction

Authors

  • Charlotte Jørgensen Department of Media, Cognition, and Communication Rhetoric Section University of Copenhagen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v34i2.4062

Keywords:

Argumentation theory, Christian Kock, dialectic, fields of argument, J. Anthony Blair, logic, perspectives on argument, rhetoric

Abstract

Taking Blair’s recent contribution to the debate about the triad as its starting point, the article discusses and challenges attempts to reduce the intricate relationship between rhetoric, dialectic and logic to a trichotomy with watertight compartments or to separate them with a single clear-cut criterion. I argue that efforts to pinpoint an essential difference, among the various typical differences partly grounded in disciplinary traditions, obscure the complexities within the fields. As a consequence, crosscutting properties of the fields as well as the possibilities for theoretical bridging between them are neglected.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-02

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright for each article published in Informal Logic belongs to its author(s). Informal Logic has the right of first publication. Permission to reprint any article that appears in Informal Logic MUST be obtained in writing from the author(s). In addition to any form of acknowledgement required by the author(s), the following notice must be added to the statement of copyright permission made in the reprint (with the appropriate numbers replacing the ellipses): [Article Title] was originally published in Informal Logic, [year], Volume ..., Number ..., pp. ...-... .