Skip to main content
Log in

Confucianism as political philosophy: A postmodern perspective

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, R. T. (1983).The art of rulership. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1965).Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Rev. and enl. ed. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1971). Thinking and moral considerations: A lecture.Social Research 38.

  • Bakhtin, M. (1984).Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Ed. and trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977).Image-music-text. Trans. S. Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1987).Legislators and interpreters. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, S. (1929). Dante ... Bruno. Vico.. Joyce. In S. Beckett et al.,Our exagmination round his factification for incamination of Work in progress. London: Shakespeare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benamou, M. and Caramello, C. (Eds.) (1977).Performance in postmodern culture. Madison, WI: Coda Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, R. P. (1952).Language as gesture. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. O. (1960).Love's body. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Y. (1973).Chinese calligraphy. 3rd, rev. and enl. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1939).The principles of art. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H. G. (1929).Sinism. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daelemans, S. and Maranhão, T. (1990). Psychoanalytic dialogue and the dialogical principle. In T. Maranhão (Ed.),The interpretation of dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFrancis, J. (1989).Visible speech. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. and McDonald, C. V. (1982). Choreographies.Diacritics 12.

  • Emerson, R. W. (N. d.).Essays: Second series. New York: Lovell, Coryell.

  • Felman, S. (1983).The literary speech act. Trans. C. Porter. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felman, S. (1987).Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felman, S. (1991). In an era of testimony: Claude Lanzmann'sShoah. Yale French Studies No. 79.

  • Fenollosa, E. (1964).The Chinese written character as a medium for poetry. Ed. E. Pound. San Francisco: City Light.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, H. (1972).Confucius — The secular as sacred. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.),Language, counter-memory, practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983).This is not a pipe. Trans. and ed. J. Harkness. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1991).Truth and method. 2nd. rev. ed. Rev. trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiades, T. (1967).Greek music, verse and dance. Trans. E. Benedikt and M. L. Martinez. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granet, M. (1950).La pensée chinoise. Paris: Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1968).What is called thinking? Trans. F. D. Wieck and J. G. Gray. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971).Poetry, language, thought. Trans. A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977).The question concerning technology and other essays. Trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1982).The basic problems of phenomenology. Trans. A. Hofstadter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. (1963).The development of the logical method in ancient China. 2nd ed. New York: Paragon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, M. (1979).Hegel et l'Orient. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. Y. (1965). Wang Yang-ming and existential phenomenology.International Philosophical Quarterly 5.

  • Jung, H. Y. (1966).Jen: An existential and phenomenological problem of intersubjectivity.Philosophy East and West 16.

  • Jung, H. Y. (1969). Confucianism and existentialism: Intersubjectivity as the way of man.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30.

  • Jung, H. Y. (1984). Misreading the ideogram: From Fenollosa to Derrida and McLuhan.Paideuman 13.

  • Jung, H. Y. (1985). The edification of oral hermeneutics and the ecology of the text. InProceedings of the Xth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, Vol. 2: C. Guillen (Ed.),Comparative poetics. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. Y. (1986). The unity of knowledge and action: A postscript to Wang Yang-ming's existential phenomenology.Journal of Chinese Studies 3.

  • Jung, H. Y. (1987). Heidegger's way with sinitic thinking. In G. Parkes (Ed.),Heidegger and Asian thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. Y. (1989).The question of rationality and the basic grammar of intercultural texts. Niigata, Japan: International University of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. Y. (1991). The way of ecopiety: An essay in deep ecology from a sinitic perspective.Asian Philosophy 1.

  • Kenner, H. (1951).The poetry of Ezra Pound. Norfolk, CT: New Directions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermode, F. (1962).Puzzles and epiphanies. New York: Chilmark Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L. (1968).Toward a Marxist humanism. Trans. J. Z. Peel. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1977).About Chinese women. Trans. A. Barrows. New York: Urizen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. O.-f. (1991). On the margins of the Chinese discourse: Some personal thoughts on the cultural meanings of the periphery.Daedalus 120.

  • Levinas, E. (1969).Totality and infinity. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. and Kearney, R. (1986). Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. In R. A. Cohen (Ed.),Face to face with Levinas. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, K. (1989). Decentering the self: Two perspectives from philosophical anthropology. In A. B. Dallery and C. E. Scott (Eds.),The question of the other. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984).The postmodern condition. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. and Parker, H. (1968).Through the vanishing point. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964).Signs. Trans. R. C. McCleary. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, I. (1962).The nobility of failure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C. (1989). Introduction. In G. S. Morson and C. Emerson (Eds.),Rethinking Bakhtin. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A. (1991). Review of Jean-Claude Schmitt,La raison des gestes dans l'Occident médiéval. TLS. 26 April.

  • Nakamura, H. (1964).Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples. Ed. P. P. Wiener. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967).The birth of tragedy. Trans. W. Kaufman. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, N. (1988). The personal is political: Discursive practice of the face-to-face. In R. Bernasconi and D. Wood (Eds.),The provocation of Levinas. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, R. (1971).The performing self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. L. (1977).Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1974).The conflict of interpretations. Ed. D. Ihde. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, A. (1988).In search of self in India and Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J. (1908).The philosophy of loyalty. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1978).Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (1988).Performance theory. Rev. ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, J.-C. (1989). The ethics of gesture. InFragments of a history of human body. Trans. I. Patterson and ed. M. Feher with R. Naddaff and N. Tazi. New York: Urzone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. E. (1990).The question of ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1991).Hermeneutics and human finitude. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. (1990).The practice of the wild. San Francisco: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D. P. (1982).Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. T. (1959).Zen and Japanese culture. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, T. (1954).The six scripts or the principles of Chinese writing. Trans. L. D. Hopkins. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C. (1987).Altarity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchang, T.-m. (1937).L'écriture chinoise et le geste humain. Paris: Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. (1989).Centrality and commonality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.-M. (1991). Cultural China: The periphery as the center.Daedalus 120.

  • Valéry, P. (1956).Dialogues. Trans. W. M. Stewart. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1988). Hermeneutics as koine.Theory, Culture and Society: Postmodernism 5.

  • Vico, G. (1984).The new science. Trans. T. G. Bergin and M. H. Fisch. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyschogrod, E. (1990).Saints and postmodernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, H.Y. Confucianism as political philosophy: A postmodern perspective. Hum Stud 16, 213–230 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318581

Keywords

Navigation