Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:13:55.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert Boyle: a Freudian perspective on an eminent scientist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

BRETT KAHR
Affiliation:
Child and Family Department, Tavistock Clinic, London, and School of Psychotherapy and Counselling, Regent's College, Inner Circle, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4NS

Abstract

On 31 May 1936 Professor Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, wrote a letter to the Austrian littérateur Arnold Zweig, warning him about the dangers of undertaking biographical research. Freud intoned that ‘anyone turning biographer commits himself to lies, to concealment, to hypocrisy, to flattery, and even to hiding his own lack of understanding, for biographical truth is not to be had, and even if it were it couldn't be used’.

As a psychoanalyst, Freud knew only too well how readily each individual person employs the ubiquitous mechanisms of defence such as repression, projection, splitting and idealization, all of which operate to conceal our deepest, innermost affective states; and he questioned therefore how accurately someone could write a life history. Freud harboured other anxieties about the craft of biography. In his classic monograph on Leonardo da Vinci, published in 1910, the great Viennese analyst not only lamented ‘the uncertainty and fragmentary nature of the material relating to him which tradition makes available’, but also questioned the very enterprise of psychologically informed biographical work itself.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)